Discussion in 'Politics' started by beretta304, Aug 23, 2012.
Obama in 2003 Video Says He’s Pro-Choice Even With Late-Term Abortions | Video | TheBlaze.com
Radical eugenists are anti-science.
Only two people should be involved in a decision on an abortion.
The woman and her doctor.
Not the government, church, insurance companies or anyone else.
Seems simple enough.
I am pro-choice. I believe that women make responsible choices and they know better than anybody the tragedy of a difficult pregnancy and I dont think that its the governments role to meddle in that choice.
If only all politicians felt the same.
How... anti-science of you.
As bizarre as most of your comments...
I find it amusing that the very same people who claim the government can't do anything right are the ones who think the government should be able to dictate when and why a woman should be allowed to end a pregnancy.
Is a typical child capable of surviving outside of the womb 2 minutes before it is born, scientifically speaking?
again, why should I care?
Any woman having a late term abortion is having it for a pretty good reason. Usually because the fetus might survive, but it has some horrible disease like Brittle Bone Syndrome or Spina Bifida or something like that.
Again, I have to wonder what kind of misogynistic sadists run the GOP these days.
But here's the real irony. You jokers who are actually voting on this issue are being played.
They've been playing you since 1976.
The last thing in the world the GOP wants is for Roe v. Wade to be overturned, and a lot of angry women showing up at the polling place ready to pull the lever for democrats.
Which is why four of the 8 SCOTUS justices appointed by Republicans since Roe have voted to uphold it.
What no anecdote about about your tenure as a leading abortion counselor to support this ?
Well, Iknow how much you love hearing about real life experiences... having never had any yourself.
Separate names with a comma.