Log in or Sign up

Obama: Civil liberty disaster

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Quantum Windbag, Sep 29, 2011.

Page 1 of 3

Sep 29, 2011 #1

Offline
Quantum Windbag Gold Member

Joined:

May 9, 2010

Messages:

58,308

Thanks Received:

5,017

Trophy Points:

245

Ratings:

+5,226
The base is getting restless, not a good sign.

Civil libertarians have long had a dysfunctional relationship with the Democratic Party, which treats them as a captive voting bloc with nowhere else to turn in elections. Not even this history, however, prepared civil libertarians for Obama. After the George W. Bush years, they were ready to fight to regain ground lost after Sept. 11. Historically, this country has tended to correct periods of heightened police powers with a pendulum swing back toward greater individual rights. Many were questioning the extreme measures taken by the Bush administration, especially after the disclosure of abuses and illegalities. Candidate Obama capitalized on this swing and portrayed himself as the champion of civil liberties.

However, President Obama not only retained the controversial Bush policies, he expanded on them. The earliest, and most startling, move came quickly. Soon after his election, various military and political figures reported that Obama reportedly promised Bush officials in private that no one would be investigated or prosecuted for torture. In his first year, Obama made good on that promise, announcing that no CIA employee would be prosecuted for torture. Later, his administration refused to prosecute any of the Bush officials responsible for ordering or justifying the program and embraced the "just following orders" defense for other officials, the very defense rejected by the United States at the Nuremberg trials after World War II.

Obama failed to close Guantanamo Bay as promised. He continued warrantless surveillance and military tribunals that denied defendants basic rights. He asserted the right to kill U.S. citizens he views as terrorists. His administration has fought to block dozens of public-interest lawsuits challenging privacy violations and presidential abuses.

But perhaps the biggest blow to civil liberties is what he has done to the movement itself. It has quieted to a whisper, muted by the power of Obama's personality and his symbolic importance as the first black president as well as the liberal who replaced Bush. Indeed, only a few days after he took office, the Nobel committee awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize without his having a single accomplishment to his credit beyond being elected. Many Democrats were, and remain, enraptured.

It's almost a classic case of the Stockholm syndrome, in which a hostage bonds with his captor despite the obvious threat to his existence. Even though many Democrats admit in private that they are shocked by Obama's position on civil liberties, they are incapable of opposing him. Some insist that they are simply motivated by realism: A Republican would be worse. However, realism alone cannot explain the utter absence of a push for an alternative Democratic candidate or organized opposition to Obama's policies on civil liberties in Congress during his term. It looks more like a cult of personality. Obama's policies have become secondary to his persona.
Click to expand...

President Obama has been a disaster for civil liberties - latimes.com
- Thank You! x 3
Sep 30, 2011 #2

Offline
Poli_Sigh Active Member

Joined:

Dec 3, 2010

Messages:

334

Thanks Received:

64

Trophy Points:

28

Location:

San Francisco-Bay Area

Ratings:

+64

If Obama is a civil liberty disaster, it is because he had excellent guides and teachers. The Patriot Act was most egregious in its unmitigated attempt to curtail American citizens. And I do believe it was Bush and Cheney who used communication giants like AT&T to spy on American citizens without benefit of first obtaining a subpoena to do so - talk about circumventing the law which is always an attack on America's civil liberties.

The real attack on our civil liberties continue because of arrogant politicians who are unwilling or unable to accept their share of the responsibility and those who blindly support them. Obama may have in too many incidences followed the lead set by Bush and Company with regard to policies aimed at further stripping Americans of their civil rights, but he most certainly did not spearhead it. If you must place blame, which the majority of conservative Americans are driven to do, start at the beginning, not in the middle.
Sep 30, 2011 #3

Offline
del BANNED

Joined:

Sep 3, 2008

Messages:

45,052

Thanks Received:

9,832

Trophy Points:

0

Ratings:

+9,896

Poli_Sigh said: ↑

If Obama is a civil liberty disaster, it is because he had excellent guides and teachers. The Patriot Act was most egregious in its unmitigated attempt to curtail American citizens. And I do believe it was Bush and Cheney who used communication giants like AT&T to spy on American citizens without benefit of first obtaining a subpoena to do so - talk about circumventing the law which is always an attack on America's civil liberties.

The real attack on our civil liberties continue because of arrogant politicians who are unwilling or unable to accept their share of the responsibility and those who blindly support them. Obama may have in too many incidences followed the lead set by Bush and Company with regard to policies aimed at further stripping Americans of their civil rights, but he most certainly did not spearhead it. If you must place blame, which the majority of conservative Americans are driven to do, start at the beginning, not in the middle.
Click to expand...

remind me. who is potus now?
Sep 30, 2011 #4

Offline
Quantum Windbag Gold Member

Joined:

May 9, 2010

Messages:

58,308

Thanks Received:

5,017

Trophy Points:

245

Ratings:

+5,226

del said: ↑

Poli_Sigh said: ↑

If Obama is a civil liberty disaster, it is because he had excellent guides and teachers. The Patriot Act was most egregious in its unmitigated attempt to curtail American citizens. And I do believe it was Bush and Cheney who used communication giants like AT&T to spy on American citizens without benefit of first obtaining a subpoena to do so - talk about circumventing the law which is always an attack on America's civil liberties.

The real attack on our civil liberties continue because of arrogant politicians who are unwilling or unable to accept their share of the responsibility and those who blindly support them. Obama may have in too many incidences followed the lead set by Bush and Company with regard to policies aimed at further stripping Americans of their civil rights, but he most certainly did not spearhead it. If you must place blame, which the majority of conservative Americans are driven to do, start at the beginning, not in the middle.
Click to expand...

remind me. who is potus now?
Click to expand...

Booooooooooooooooooooooosh
Sep 30, 2011 #5

Offline
CaféAuLait This Space for Rent

Joined:

Oct 29, 2008

Messages:

7,777

Thanks Received:

1,947

Trophy Points:

245

Location:

Pacific Northwest

Ratings:

+2,324

but perhaps the biggest blow to civil liberties is what he has done to the movement itself. It has quieted to a whisper, muted by the power of obama's personality and his symbolic importance as the first black president as well as the liberal who replaced bush. Indeed, only a few days after he took office, the nobel committee awarded him the nobel peace prize without his having a single accomplishment to his credit beyond being elected. Many democrats were, and remain, enraptured.

it's almost a classic case of the stockholm syndrome, in which a hostage bonds with his captor despite the obvious threat to his existence. Even though many democrats admit in private that they are shocked by obama's position on civil liberties, they are incapable of opposing him. some insist that they are simply motivated by realism: A republican would be worse. However, realism alone cannot explain the utter absence of a push for an alternative democratic candidate or organized opposition to obama's policies on civil liberties in congress during his term. It looks more like a cult of personality. Obama's policies have become secondary to his persona.
Click to expand...

wow!
Sep 30, 2011 #6

Offline
editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

Joined:

Jun 5, 2008

Messages:

41,427

Thanks Received:

5,598

Trophy Points:

48

Location:

Maine

Ratings:

+5,627

Obama: Civil liberty disaster
Click to expand...

Sadly true.
Sep 30, 2011 #7

Offline
yidnar Gold Member

Joined:

Jul 16, 2011

Messages:

7,215

Thanks Received:

801

Trophy Points:

190

Location:

Inside your head.

Ratings:

+932

the left is loosing confidence in their dear leader !!!!!!!!!
Sep 30, 2011 #8

Offline
LOki The Yaweh of Mischief

Joined:

Mar 26, 2006

Messages:

4,020

Thanks Received:

350

Trophy Points:

85

Ratings:

+585

Many were questioning the extreme measures taken by the Bush administration, especially after the disclosure of abuses and illegalities. Candidate Obama capitalized on this swing and portrayed himself as the champion of civil liberties.

However, President Obama not only retained the controversial Bush policies, he expanded on them. The earliest, and most startling, move came quickly. Soon after his election, various military and political figures reported that Obama reportedly promised Bush officials in private that no one would be investigated or prosecuted for torture. In his first year, Obama made good on that promise, announcing that no CIA employee would be prosecuted for torture. Later, his administration refused to prosecute any of the Bush officials responsible for ordering or justifying the program and embraced the "just following orders" defense for other officials, the very defense rejected by the United States at the Nuremberg trials after World War II.

Obama failed to close Guantanamo Bay as promised. He continued warrantless surveillance and military tribunals that denied defendants basic rights. He asserted the right to kill U.S. citizens he views as terrorists. His administration has fought to block dozens of public-interest lawsuits challenging privacy violations and presidential abuses.

But perhaps the biggest blow to civil liberties is what he has done to the movement itself. It has quieted to a whisper, muted by the power of Obama's personality and his symbolic importance as the first black president as well as the liberal who replaced Bush. Indeed, only a few days after he took office, the Nobel committee awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize without his having a single accomplishment to his credit beyond being elected. Many Democrats were, and remain, enraptured.
Click to expand...

Oh! There's a HUGE difference between Bush and Obama!
Sep 30, 2011 #9

Offline
Mr. Shaman Senior Member

Joined:

May 4, 2010

Messages:

23,892

Thanks Received:

817

Trophy Points:

48

Ratings:

+819

Quantum Windbag said: ↑

Obama: Civil liberty disaster.
Click to expand...

Hey.....c'mon......the dude....

...left the U.S.....
Click to expand...

.....on his own accord.

Quit'cher whining........
Sep 30, 2011 #10

Offline
Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

Joined:

Oct 4, 2010

Messages:

56,535

Thanks Received:

6,134

Trophy Points:

1,840

Location:

New York City

Ratings:

+7,399

Signing the extension of the Patriot Act was a real low point.

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 1 of 3

Share This Page

Active Topics

Don’t Trust the CBO’s Numbers
American_Jihad posted May 25, 2017 at 3:30 AM
Dueling Prosecutors
Flanders posted May 25, 2017 at 3:26 AM
Moody's downgrades China's...
waltky posted May 25, 2017 at 3:24 AM
Java in windows 10
Dajjal posted May 25, 2017 at 2:12 AM
Another question to the left ,...
bear513 posted May 25, 2017 at 1:54 AM
"Arrest Napolitano! Janet Must Go!"
American_Jihad posted May 25, 2017 at 1:26 AM
Ignore The Scandals, Resist The...
American_Jihad posted May 25, 2017 at 1:06 AM
Seeing the hate filled rants on...
Grampa Murked U posted May 25, 2017 at 12:28 AM

Loading...

Search