- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #121
bripat the Doosh has posted concluions and assertions but has given no verifiable facts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's another liberal myth. It would be stupid as a business policy. Furthermore, there's no historical record of it actually happening. Standard Oil never raised its prices. Never. It lowered them year after year. That's precisely what its competitors complained about and lobbied Congress to put a stop to.
So how did the consumers suffer as a result of Standard Oil producing refined petroleum products cheaper than its competitors?
You are one seriously brainwashed Ayn Randian.
Are you seriously suggesting that monopolies are just a figment of a "Liberal Imagination", and that price fixing and intentionally undercutting competition to corner a market are just fictions created by some "evil leftists" so that industry won't succeed?
Wow.
And Standard Oil did in fact raise it's prices, in areas where they held a monopoly.
I would suggest reading the actual Supreme court anti-trust decision concerning Standard Oil, as opposed to Ann Coutler's interpretation. You might learn a thing or two.
bripat the Doosh lectures on and on and on but offer nothing in evidence for his points.
Yes, natural monopolies are a left-wing myth. They have never existed because they can't exist. Those theories were originally dreamed up by envious sour-grape competitors who couldn't hack it. So they bribed enough Congressmen to get the government to prosecute their hated rival. Most of the literature on this subject is complete bullshit designed to obscure the truth, not reveal it
That would be nowhere. It never held a monopoly of any kind.
Why don't you post the section that supports your bogus claims?
Yes, natural monopolies are a left-wing myth. They have never existed because they can't exist. Those theories were originally dreamed up by envious sour-grape competitors who couldn't hack it. So they bribed enough Congressmen to get the government to prosecute their hated rival. Most of the literature on this subject is complete bullshit designed to obscure the truth, not reveal it
Wow, just wow.
That would be nowhere. It never held a monopoly of any kind.
By 1890, Standard oil owned 88% of refined petroleum production in the US.
That is, most certainly, a monopoly by anyone's definition.
Why don't you post the section that supports your bogus claims?
Here is where the prosecution established that the price of REFINED oil (not crude oil) rose by 45%, in comparison to a 23% price increase of other commodities during the period from 1895 to 1906.
During the same period, the price of crude oil was flat, as can be seen here:
Historical Crude Oil prices, 1861 to Present
Which means that Standard Oil was increasing it's prices, once it had a monopoly.
On May 15, 1911, the US Supreme Court upheld the lower court judgment and declared the Standard Oil group to be an "unreasonable" monopoly under the Sherman Antitrust Act, Section II.
bripat the Doosh lectures on and on and on but offer nothing in evidence for his points.
I posted all kinds of evidence, you fucking moron.
by Douglas V. Gibbs
In Obama's Marxist Tendencies, and the Response of the Founding Fathers, I used quotes by Obama, Democrats, Karl Marx, and the Founding Fathers to show where Obama stands when compared to the Founding Fathers, and Karl Marx.
Now, I think it is time to see where Obama and the Democrats stand when compared to the Ten Planks of Communism. . .
The 10 PLANKS stated in the Communist Manifesto
Read more and you Lefties steam @ Political Pistachio: Obama, and the Ten Planks of Communism
Obama's been a real successful commie..you betcha..
Banks book record profits off Fannie and Freddie - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blog Term Sheet
JPMorgan Chase posts record profits - Oct. 12, 2012
New study says $2 trillion corporate cash hoard not Obama's fault - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blog Term Sheet
GM posts record earnings for 2011 - Feb. 16, 2012
Big Oil
Do you folks even know what communism is?
Seriously?
A quick question for those who think that Obama is a communist, fascist etc....who is out to deprive us of our freedom....
If you truly believed that it were true, would you be posting it publicly on this message board? In every communist state that I know of, posting statements like that publicly will get you sent to prison quick.
So are you ready to have a shoot out with the secret police on your front lawn any minute now?
Or is it that you don't believe what your posting one tiny iota?
Please try, just try, not to be a complete idiot and asshole for a change!
Note: That would be a great New Years resolution for all you wingnuts!
Mr. Doosh, you can't have it both ways, bripat.
Obama is not more a communist than you are an intelligent person.
Libertarianism is a malignant infection of the brain.
Conservatives are more intellegent than liberals as a whole. The liberal constiuency contains the lowest of the low brows; the poorest - anyone who caters to their desire to be cared for, is a socialist - who if obtained full power would be a communist dictator. Obama is a communist dictator veiled !
Conservatives are more intellegent than liberals as a whole. The liberal constiuency contains the lowest of the low brows; the poorest - anyone who caters to their desire to be cared for, is a socialist - who if obtained full power would be a communist dictator. Obama is a communist dictator veiled !
Yup, just what Alan West preached and is now in retirement because of it.
Conservatives are more intellegent than liberals as a whole. The liberal constiuency contains the lowest of the low brows; the poorest - anyone who caters to their desire to be cared for, is a socialist - who if obtained full power would be a communist dictator. Obama is a communist dictator veiled !