Obama and Cameron in on blocking heroic Kurds from fighting ISIS

[Stephanie]

I saw something on this posted earlier. so if need mods can merge if it's duplicate.
anyway this is just Shameful and frightening all rolled into one. It's as IF they don't want to DEFEAT ISIS. Just awful AND wtf?

snip:

Blame the next gruesome ISIS video on the deadly duo polluting the news stream with their self-serving empty rhetoric that continues to enable the bloody trail of Islamic terrorism.
Obama and Cameron in on blocking heroic Kurds from fighting ISIS

​

By Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives July 2, 2015
1 Comment |
Telegraph, July 2, 2015)

“Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.

“They now say they are willing to “go it alone” in supplying heavy weapons to the Kurds, even if means defying the Iraqi authorities and their American backers, who demand all weapons be channelled through Baghdad.”

While thousands of innocents are being decapitated, crucified, drowned, thrown off building rooftops, buried alive and slaughtered wholesale by sex slave-taking Islamic State jihadists, happy golfers and holidayers President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron—so close they call each other “brother”—are aiding and abetting Islamic terrorism.

Millions are aware that Obama not only refuses to personally use the term “Islamic terrorist” in his own lavish vocabulary, he has banned the use of the term from the public lexicon.

Not so many are aware that Obama’s British sidekick David Cameron only on Monday advised the BBC “to stop calling the barbaric group ‘Islamic State’ because the name is offensive to ‘many Muslims’.” (Daily Mail, June 29, 2015)

all of it here:
Obama and Cameron in on blocking heroic Kurds from fighting ISIS

 

[Pete7469]

The US under the moonbat messiah isn't leading from behind, we're leading from a fetal position under the bed.

 

[nuhuh]

The US under the moonbat messiah isn't leading from behind, we're leading from a fetal position under the bed.

Then you need to have Republican Senators crawl out from under the bed since it was they who blocked the vote.

 

[paulitician]

ISIS works for the U.S. Just follow the money. It all leads back to mainly Saudi Arabia, Great Britain, and the U.S. This stance against the Kurds proves that. ISIS was created to kill Assad. It could easily be defeated. But it's being allowed to run wild till it accomplishes its mission.

It is a bit of a Frankenstein, but it's controlled and contained for the most part. It's being allowed to claim some lands, while other lands are off-limits. It's being allowed to claim mostly Syrian territory. Its advances into Iraq have been stopped. It was ordered to turn back. Once Assad's dead, ISIS will either 'miraculously' disappear, or be hunted down and killed by its masters.

 

[Kosh]

Yes the far left is supporting Obama illegal wars..

 

[The VOR]

I saw something on this posted earlier. so if need mods can merge if it's duplicate.
anyway this is just Shameful and frightening all rolled into one. It's as IF they don't want to DEFEAT ISIS. Just awful AND wtf?

snip:

Blame the next gruesome ISIS video on the deadly duo polluting the news stream with their self-serving empty rhetoric that continues to enable the bloody trail of Islamic terrorism.
Obama and Cameron in on blocking heroic Kurds from fighting ISIS

​

By Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives July 2, 2015
1 Comment |
Telegraph, July 2, 2015)

“Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.

“They now say they are willing to “go it alone” in supplying heavy weapons to the Kurds, even if means defying the Iraqi authorities and their American backers, who demand all weapons be channelled through Baghdad.”

While thousands of innocents are being decapitated, crucified, drowned, thrown off building rooftops, buried alive and slaughtered wholesale by sex slave-taking Islamic State jihadists, happy golfers and holidayers President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron—so close they call each other “brother”—are aiding and abetting Islamic terrorism.

Millions are aware that Obama not only refuses to personally use the term “Islamic terrorist” in his own lavish vocabulary, he has banned the use of the term from the public lexicon.

Not so many are aware that Obama’s British sidekick David Cameron only on Monday advised the BBC “to stop calling the barbaric group ‘Islamic State’ because the name is offensive to ‘many Muslims’.” (Daily Mail, June 29, 2015)

all of it here:
Obama and Cameron in on blocking heroic Kurds from fighting ISIS

I'll tell you the same thing I told the other smelly, vile twat. If you are so concerned about the Kurds, then get your big, fat trailer park trash ass over there and help them.

 

[g5000]

I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.

You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governments.

The Republican Congress has to give him the authority to ship arms to the Kurds.

Got that?

I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.

Hypocrites.

 

[Kosh]

I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.

You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governemnts.

I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.

Hypocrites.

And as always the irony impaired far left drones do not read what is posted..

The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq,

US blocks attempts by Arab allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds to fight Islamic State - Telegraph

Not sure how the far left can blame the senate for blocking other countries..

But leave it to the far left drones to trout out the "hate" of anything not far left..

 

[paulitician]

You would think this would convince Americans that ISIS does work for the U.S. It's a Saudi, British, U.S. Frankenstein. It appears that it's totally out of control, but it's actually being controlled and contained.

ISIS could easily be defeated. But that's not what the U.S. and allies want. They want chaos and they want Assad dead. So it's time to screw the Kurds a bit. They don't want ISIS dead yet.

 

[g5000]

I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.

You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governemnts.

I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.

Hypocrites.

And as always the irony impaired far left drones do not read what is posted..

The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq,

US blocks attempts by Arab allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds to fight Islamic State - Telegraph

Not sure how the far left can blame the senate for blocking other countries..

But leave it to the far left drones to trout out the "hate" of anything not far left..

Read your own link, one-track idiot:

The Senate voted down one attempt by supporters of the Kurdish cause last month.

The Obama Admin cannot aid and abet arms trafficking to the Kurds, as that would violate US law.

So write your Republican Congressman and Senators to get on the ball.

 

[paulitician]

The Kurds are winning against ISIS. So why slow the arming & funding for them? Americans need to ask themselves that question. Why help ISIS out at a time it's being defeated?

 

[Moonglow]

“Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.

Yet one can't deny that Iraq wants no arming of the rebels only Shia..

I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.

You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governemnts.

I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.

Hypocrites.

And as always the irony impaired far left drones do not read what is posted..

The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq,

US blocks attempts by Arab allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds to fight Islamic State - Telegraph

Not sure how the far left can blame the senate for blocking other countries..

But leave it to the far left drones to trout out the "hate" of anything not far left..

The Iraq govt. doesn't want the heavy weapons given to Sunni militias, have you ever heard of them? Iraq?

 

[Moonglow]

The Kurds are winning against ISIS. So why slow the arming & funding for them? Americans need to ask themselves that question. Why help ISIS out at a time it's being defeated?

Congress refused to pass the measure that would have allowed it....Oblama requested it in January of 2015...

 

[paulitician]

The Kurds are winning against ISIS. So why slow the arming & funding for them? Americans need to ask themselves that question. Why help ISIS out at a time it's being defeated?

Congress refused to pass the measure that would have allowed it....Oblama requested it in January of 2015...

But why? Looks like the U.S. doesn't want ISIS gone just yet. And that's because ISIS works for the U.S. It hasn't completed its mission yet. Which is to destroy Syria and kill Assad.

 

[Moonglow]

The Kurds are winning against ISIS. So why slow the arming & funding for them? Americans need to ask themselves that question. Why help ISIS out at a time it's being defeated?

Congress refused to pass the measure that would have allowed it....Oblama requested it in January of 2015...

But why? Looks like the U.S. doesn't want ISIS gone just yet. And that's because ISIS works for the U.S. It hasn't completed its mission yet. Which to destroy Syria and kill Assad.

Be sure to get loser fitting yoga britches, the old ones are cuttin' of air to yer brain...

 

[paulitician]

The U.S. and Great Britain want to control all funding & arming of the Kurds. That's what this is about. But why do they want all the control?

 

[paulitician]

The Kurds are winning against ISIS. So why slow the arming & funding for them? Americans need to ask themselves that question. Why help ISIS out at a time it's being defeated?

Congress refused to pass the measure that would have allowed it....Oblama requested it in January of 2015...

But why? Looks like the U.S. doesn't want ISIS gone just yet. And that's because ISIS works for the U.S. It hasn't completed its mission yet. Which to destroy Syria and kill Assad.

Be sure to get loser fitting yoga britches, the old ones are cuttin' of air to yer brain...

Just follow the money. All ISIS funding & arming leads back to mainly Saudi Arabia, Great Britain, and the U.S.

 

[g5000]

August of last year: Obama weighs in on Iraqi pol faceoff as U.S. arms Kurds against ISIS - NY Daily News

In a sign of how little faith the White House has in Iraq’s leaders in Baghdad, the U.S. bypassed them completely and started sending weapons directly to the Kurds.

November of last year: US Congress introduces legislation to arm Kurds America-Canada Worldbulletin News

Introduced by House Foreign Affairs Chairman Ed Royce, the legislation grants President Barack Obama temporary authority to provide weapons directly to Kurdish peshmerga fighters, which Royce said “have proven to be the most effective ground force currently fighting ISIL.”

“For months, I have urged the administration to urgently arm the Kurds. So too have many others in Congress,” he said in a statement emailed to reporters. “This important legislation will finally allow the 190,000-strong force to get the firepower it needs to effectively fight this brutal terrorist organization.”

The bill stipulates that U.S. policy will be to directly provide the Kurdistan Regional Government "with advanced conventional weapons, training, and defense services, on an emergency and temporary basis."

 

[g5000]

“Some of America’s closest allies say President Barack Obama and other Western leaders, including David Cameron, are failing to show strategic leadership over the world’s gravest security crisis for decades.

Yet one can't deny that Iraq wants no arming of the rebels only Shia..

I can't help but notice the OP failed to mention the Senate voted down a measure to provide arms directly to the Kurds in June.

You see, it is ILLEGAL for Obama to provide arms directly to the Kurds. He is required by law to only provide arms to recognized sovereign governemnts.

I know how much you faux raging, fake scandalizers care about Obama doing things legally. You're constantly moaning how he is violating the Constitution and stuff, and here he is abiding by it, and you STILL complain.

Hypocrites.

And as always the irony impaired far left drones do not read what is posted..

The United States has blocked attempts by its Middle East allies to fly heavy weapons directly to the Kurds fighting Islamic State jihadists in Iraq,

US blocks attempts by Arab allies to fly heavy weapons directly to Kurds to fight Islamic State - Telegraph

Not sure how the far left can blame the senate for blocking other countries..

But leave it to the far left drones to trout out the "hate" of anything not far left..

The Iraq govt. doesn't want the heavy weapons given to Sunni militias, have you ever heard of them? Iraq?

Arming the Kurds would also provoke the Shia militias into attacking US interests in the region.

 

[paulitician]

And Turkey's about to invade Syria to kill both the Kurds and ISIS. Another reason the U.S. and Great Britain are slowing funding & arming to the Kurds. Turkey is a very important strategic ally for the West. And it's very unhappy about all the money & weapons flowing to the Kurds.