Obama Admin Paid Iran $1.7 Billion, Iran says money was ransom payment

Jroc

יעקב כהן
Oct 19, 2010
19,815
6,469
390
Michigan
Did Obama, Kerry pay Iran ransom for the hostages? ..of course they did it's open season on Americans under Obama


Iran says money was ransom payment

The Obama administration is facing criticism for paying Iran $1.7 billion in taxpayer funds as part of what critics described as a “ransom” bound up in a controversial hostage trade designed to secure the release of five Americans long held by Iran, according to conversations with administration officials and experts critical of the agreement.
The administration denies the issues are tied and insists that the money was provided to settle a decades-old dispute with Iran over the United States’ refusal to make good on a deal to provide the country military equipment following the 1979 Islamic revolution.


A senior Iranian military commander said Wednesday that the cash settlement was reached as a perk to motivate Iranian authorities to free the imprisoned Americans, who were released over the weekend.
“The annulment of sanctions against Iran’s Bank Sepah and reclaiming of $1.7bln of Iran’s frozen assets after 36 years showed that the US doesn’t understand anything but the language of force,” Mohammad Reza Naqdi, the commander of Iran’s volunteer Basij forces, told the country’s state-controlled press.
“This money was returned for the freedom of the U.S. spy and it was not related to the [nuclear] negotiations,” he said.

[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Obama Admin Paid Iran $1.7 Billion From Taxpayer Funds[/FONT]
 
Hostage situations should be answered------with HOSTAGE SITUATIONS----
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
Holy shit
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .


The Frozen assets were a separate issue genius. How about you get your talking points straight ..Ok Timmy? :slap:
 
Last edited:
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
Why don't you read the quote contained in the OP, Dumbass.

If Iran wants to understand "the use of force", fine...


“The annulment of sanctions against Iran’s Bank Sepah and reclaiming of $1.7bln of Iran’s frozen assets after 36 years showed that the US doesn’t understand anything but the language of force,” Mohammad Reza Naqdi, the commander of Iran’s volunteer Basij forces, told the country’s state-controlled press."

Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance | Arms Control Association

United States:
According to the March 2015 New START declaration, the United States has 1,597 strategic nuclear warheads deployed on 785 ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers [1]. The Federation of American Scientists estimates that the United States' nondeployed strategic arsenal is approximately 2,800 warheads and the U.S. tactical nuclear arsenal numbers 500 warheads. According to the U.S. State Department, the United States possessed 4,717 active nuclear warheads as of September 30, 2014 [2], including tactical, strategic, and nondeployed weapons.

Why bring a BB gun to a serious gunfight???
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
You're not very bright!
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
You're not very bright!
Well, we all know Timmy...
5675287846_ac1b172e4b(1).jpg
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
No, the frozen assets amounted to $1.5B and then the US paid them an additional $1.7B and said it was interest. Iran is saying it was not interest, it was a ransom. If that is the case, it goes against all of our policies!
 
Oh brother . They didn't pay them , those were IRAN assets that were frozen but now are released wh the sanctions ending . That was going to happen anyway.

Getting the prisoners out was a bonus on our side .
No, the frozen assets amounted to $1.5B and then the US paid them an additional $1.7B and said it was interest. Iran is saying it was not interest, it was a ransom. If that is the case, it goes against all of our policies!


The frozen assets were 50 to 100 billion actually this has nothing to do with that. Read the O.P. please

The administration denies the issues are tied and insists that the money was provided to settle a decades-old dispute with Iran over the United States’ refusal to make good on a deal to provide the country military equipment following the 1979 Islamic revolution
.
 
Who gives a fuck about what IRAN says . They will make up any shit in order to appease their versions of "conservatives".

Why? Cause the U.S. scored a good deal and now IRAN is spinning things to save face .:
 
Who gives a fuck about what IRAN says . They will make up any shit in order to appease their versions of "conservatives".

Why? Cause the U.S. scored a good deal and now IRAN is spinning things to save face .:
Well, now that I think about it, the interest being more that the principle is strange and why do they get interest at all? We were not taking the place of a bank!
 
Who gives a fuck about what IRAN says . They will make up any shit in order to appease their versions of "conservatives".

Why? Cause the U.S. scored a good deal and now IRAN is spinning things to save face .:


A good deal for Iran. They'll take a few more hostages squeeze some more out of Obama
 
Who gives a fuck about what IRAN says . They will make up any shit in order to appease their versions of "conservatives".

Why? Cause the U.S. scored a good deal and now IRAN is spinning things to save face .:


A good deal for Iran. They'll take a few more hostages squeeze some more out of Obama
Give it to Obama, he setting a dangerous precedent.
 
Another payday coming? :dunno:



Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia

Iraqi security forces believe that the three Americans recently kidnapped in Baghdad were taken by Iran-backed Shiite militias.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Iraqi police were engaged in a search effort Monday for the Americans, flying helicopters over the southern Dora neighborhood of the Iraqi capital where authorities say the Americans were abducted. Police had also set up checkpoints in the area.

Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia
 
Another payday coming? :dunno:



Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia

Iraqi security forces believe that the three Americans recently kidnapped in Baghdad were taken by Iran-backed Shiite militias.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Iraqi police were engaged in a search effort Monday for the Americans, flying helicopters over the southern Dora neighborhood of the Iraqi capital where authorities say the Americans were abducted. Police had also set up checkpoints in the area.

Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia
From your link:

Iraqi security forces believe that the three Americans recently kidnapped in Baghdad were taken by Iran-backed Shiite militias.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Iraqi police were engaged in a search effort Monday for the Americans, flying helicopters over the southern Dora neighborhood of the Iraqi capital where authorities say the Americans were abducted. Police had also set up checkpoints in the area.

They have a precedent set. Now watch, more hostages will be taken. Thank you, Obama and Kerry! How much are you going to give of tax payer funds to get them back and say it was a coup for your friendly relationship with Iran?
 
Another payday coming? :dunno:



Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia

Iraqi security forces believe that the three Americans recently kidnapped in Baghdad were taken by Iran-backed Shiite militias.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Iraqi police were engaged in a search effort Monday for the Americans, flying helicopters over the southern Dora neighborhood of the Iraqi capital where authorities say the Americans were abducted. Police had also set up checkpoints in the area.

Iraqi Police Say 3 Americans Abducted by Iran-Backed Shiite Militia
From your link:

Iraqi security forces believe that the three Americans recently kidnapped in Baghdad were taken by Iran-backed Shiite militias.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Iraqi police were engaged in a search effort Monday for the Americans, flying helicopters over the southern Dora neighborhood of the Iraqi capital where authorities say the Americans were abducted. Police had also set up checkpoints in the area.

They have a precedent set. Now watch, more hostages will be taken. Thank you, Obama and Kerry! How much are you going to give of tax payer funds to get them back and say it was a coup for your friendly relationship with Iran?


Yep now it pays to take American hostages :mad:
 
Helluva deal for Iran.

Not so much for the taxpayers of America.

And here we have Obama and Kerry patting themselves on the back on sucha good deal.

Morons.
 
Who gives a fuck about what IRAN says . They will make up any shit in order to appease their versions of "conservatives".

Why? Cause the U.S. scored a good deal and now IRAN is spinning things to save face .:

RW's care. They'd much rather believe Iran or a communist KGB thug than their own country.

what else is new huh.
 
and thennnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

The Abu Sayyaf M.O. was the normal one—to demand large (or oddly not so large; the original demand for the Burnhams’ safety was $1 million) sums of money for their captives’ safe return. There were talks, and they bled into 2002. In April of that year, Bush gave a speech that included the line: “No nation can negotiate with terrorists, for there is no way to make peace with those whose only goal is death.”
A nice line. But of course, at that exact moment, the United States was negotiating intently with Abu Sayyaf for the Burnhams’ release. And not only that: The Bush administration arranged an indirect payment to Abu Sayyaf of $300,000, as reported a little later by ABC’s John McWethy, the veteran Pentagon correspondent, and even by Fox’s Brent Baier, whose phrasing had it that “the U.S. government facilitated a ransom payment to al Qaeda-linked terrorists.”


yet another "been there, done that" score against Republicans.

but but but ,,, the story goes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top