OAN - Scrubbing Website

OAN and many other right wing purveyors of fake news and lies are staring down the barrel of multi-million dollar judgements. They can scrub their websites, but they are a day late and a dollar short. Millions of dollars short...

OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

 
OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

An investigation that resulted in tons of arrests and resignations due to links w/Russia isn't a waste of time in any book.
 
OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

An investigation that resulted in tons of arrests and resignations due to links w/Russia isn't a waste of time in any book.
Had nothing to do with that and you know it. You are an indoctrinated fool.
 
OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

An investigation that resulted in tons of arrests and resignations due to links w/Russia isn't a waste of time in any book.
Had nothing to do with that and you know it. You are an indoctrinated fool.

Had everything to do with it.

 
Looks like one of the last bastions for major wingnut news is scrubbing it's own website of Dominion stories



Oh look, another dangerous, fascist scum happy that free speech and difference of opinion is under threat of oppression by them willing to personally vouch for Dominion w/o knowing a thing about the machines by linking us to a paywall where I need to send money for the right to read the news! :eusa_clap:


View attachment 446587

I quoted most of the article.


Not interested in reading it.
So you are whining about a paywall..behind which is an article that you're not interested in reading?

 
OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

An investigation that resulted in tons of arrests and resignations due to links w/Russia isn't a waste of time in any book.
Had nothing to do with that and you know it. You are an indoctrinated fool.

Had everything to do with it.

No illegal russian collusion. Hell the fake Steele Dossier, paid for by the FBI/Hillary/DNC colluded with a Russian spy for fake info. You guys are indoctrinated.
 
OAN and Fox News told me the Mueller investigation was a waste of time and would result in nothing.

The liberal MSM told me almost daily about a new bombshell that would finally lead to Trump’s impeachment and removal from office.

The Mueller Investigation proved to be a waste of time.

Therefore it should not surprise you that I have a lot more confidence in what I see on OAN and Fox News than I do on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS.

Also once people loose confidence in the media it takes a long time to ever trust it again.

An investigation that resulted in tons of arrests and resignations due to links w/Russia isn't a waste of time in any book.
Had nothing to do with that and you know it. You are an indoctrinated fool.

Had everything to do with it.

No illegal russian collusion. Hell the fake Steele Dossier, paid for by the FBI/Hillary/DNC colluded with a Russian spy for fake info. You guys are indoctrinated.
Wasn't the Steele dossier originally ordered up by a Republican web site..Free Beacon, was it?.For oppo research? Yeah..Clinton took it and ran with it...but it was a righty who started the ball rolling.

Odd...how you guys always leave that fact out.



In October 2015, Fusion GPS was contracted by conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates. Separately, in April 2016, an attorney for Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump, while The Free Beacon stopped its backing in May 2016.[8] In June 2016, Fusion GPS subcontracted Steele's firm to compile the dossier.
 
Looks like one of the last bastions for major wingnut news is scrubbing it's own website of Dominion stories



Oh look, another dangerous, fascist scum happy that free speech and difference of opinion is under threat of oppression by them willing to personally vouch for Dominion w/o knowing a thing about the machines by linking us to a paywall where I need to send money for the right to read the news! :eusa_clap:


View attachment 446587

I quoted most of the article.


Not interested in reading it.
So you are whining about a paywall..behind which is an article that you're not interested in reading?




I'm not interested in reading anything that a site wants to charge me for just to look at to see if there is anything of interest to me. That's like going to a job interview then telling the potential employer you'll have to charge him for your time to see if he wants to hire you.
 
Looks like one of the last bastions for major wingnut news is scrubbing it's own website of Dominion stories



Oh look, another dangerous, fascist scum happy that free speech and difference of opinion is under threat of oppression by them willing to personally vouch for Dominion w/o knowing a thing about the machines by linking us to a paywall where I need to send money for the right to read the news! :eusa_clap:


View attachment 446587

I quoted most of the article.


Not interested in reading it.
So you are whining about a paywall..behind which is an article that you're not interested in reading?




I'm not interested in reading anything that a site wants to charge me for just to look at to see if there is anything of interest to me. That's like going to a job interview then telling the potential employer you'll have to charge him for your time to see if he wants to hire you.


Well, that's nothing like it but OK. What you want is to use somebody else's product for free. Well, you had the chance because most of the article was posted.
 
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.


I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.

I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.
 
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.


I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.

I believe you get so many views for free per month, I didn't have to deal with a paywall. Just the same I posted the contents of most of the article. Not sure why you're so bent out of shape except that you obviously don't want to read about what a sham OAN is.

I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.

Actually it does. It tells me they don't have the confidence to be able to defend their lying asses in court.
 
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.


I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.

I believe you get so many views for free per month, I didn't have to deal with a paywall. Just the same I posted the contents of most of the article. Not sure why you're so bent out of shape except that you obviously don't want to read about what a sham OAN is.

I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.

Actually it does. It tells me they don't have the confidence to be able to defend their lying asses in court.


Or just want to avoid costly litigation. People in the right lose cases all the time.
 
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.


I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.

I believe you get so many views for free per month, I didn't have to deal with a paywall. Just the same I posted the contents of most of the article. Not sure why you're so bent out of shape except that you obviously don't want to read about what a sham OAN is.

I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.

Actually it does. It tells me they don't have the confidence to be able to defend their lying asses in court.


Or just want to avoid costly litigation. People in the right lose cases all the time.

So a "news" organization should remove it's own articles about the very important topic of voter fraud from it's own viewers because it can't afford the litigation? That's not a news source I would trust.
 
What you want is to use somebody else's product for free.


I don't want anything. YOU selected a site with a paywall then told me to read it. They wrote the article which they want me to read then said that just to see it to see if it is anything I am interested in, I have to pay first. Most sites are free, others ask you to subscribe (no charge), others let you read for free a number of times BEFORE they ask you to pay.

I believe you get so many views for free per month, I didn't have to deal with a paywall. Just the same I posted the contents of most of the article. Not sure why you're so bent out of shape except that you obviously don't want to read about what a sham OAN is.

I can just go to OANN if I want. What they choose to do to avoid costly potential litigation has no reflection on the veracity of their story.

Actually it does. It tells me they don't have the confidence to be able to defend their lying asses in court.


Or just want to avoid costly litigation. People in the right lose cases all the time.

So a "news" organization should remove it's own articles about the very important topic of voter fraud from it's own viewers because it can't afford the litigation? That's not a news source I would trust.


Don't. Maybe they took down one article to put up an even better more damning one about Dominion! OANN is far better than any of your far left crazy sites! No one cares what you "trust."
 

Forum List

Back
Top