SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
- Thread starter
- #21
Would anyone here pay money for a Curry "forecast"? Of course they wouldn't. She's been consistently wrong on everything for years, and nobody is going to pay for failure, not even deniers. She's as capable of an accurate forecast as an astrologer or TheOldFarmersAlmanac.
Curry doesn't make forecasts...and why?...because she grasps the problems with the models and actually addresses the vast uncertainty that exists in every part of climate science....actual scientists don't make predictions based on what they believe they know...and don't make predictions when uncertainty looms large in every aspect of their field of study...that is what political hacks and pseudoscientists do..
Nobody who is paying Curry for "forecasts" gives a damn about those "forecasts". They're paying her so she can continue her as propaganda-spouting shill. The forecasting business is a front that makes it legal to accept the bribes.
Nobody pays her for forecasts because she doesn't make them...and anyone who "pays" for a forecast is paying for lip service and headlines considering the amount of uncertainty that exists in climate science...
Thanks though, for acknowledging that the left is actually paying for what they want to hear...and are willing to pay big so long as it produces big headlines... forecasts when uncertainty looms so large is, by definition propaganda...good to know that you actually know what it is...to bad you are to brain dead to apply it property to your own situation.