NY Times and CNN: No evidence Susan Rice broke the law

[Ted Frazier]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Kat]

NYT??

 

[Lakhota]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

MSNBC experts all say the same. She broke no laws. Just doing her job.

 

[OKTexas]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

 

[Darkwind]

Remember when Trump's tweet was minutes old and the media had their 'knee jerk' reaction of, "Where is the evidence?"

Rice...Oh, don't worry about any evidence, she hasn't done anything wrong.

 

[Siete]

ponder this...

ChumpDrones wants, no demands evidence in an ongoing investigation ... ongoing

Trump THINKS Rice MAY be guilty of a crime .. no evidence whatsoever NONE ..

not a single word from CHUMP or the drones ...


poor pathetic little idiots, they're either rock dumb, intentionally dishonest, or flat ass brain dead.

my $ is on all three.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

Birdcage liner.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

NYT ?
CNN ?
MSNBC ?

This is a joke...right ?

 

[Siete]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

 

[OKTexas]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Only one that appears to have made an unauthorized disclosure of classified information is Rice. How else would the papers get the names and circumstances?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Correct....

If her job was to abuse these powers to spy on political enemies.

 

[Siete]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Only one that appears to have made an unauthorized disclosure of classified information is Rice. How else would the papers get the names and circumstances?

how damn dumb are you ?

never mind, its obvious.

read the law moron.

an aside just for idiots..

The authority to unmask is not widely held, and as a threshold matter is necessarily limited to the agency that collected the information itself. During his recent testimony before the HPSCI, National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers stated that only 20 people in the entire agency have the authority to unmask the identities of U.S. persons contained in intelligence reports derived from NSA-collected intelligence information.

thats how ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[OKTexas]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Only one that appears to have made an unauthorized disclosure of classified information is Rice. How else would the papers get the names and circumstances?

how damn dumb are you ?

never mind, its obvious.

read the law moron.

an aside just for idiots..

The authority to unmask is not widely held, and as a threshold matter is necessarily limited to the agency that collected the information itself. During his recent testimony before the HPSCI, National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers stated that only 20 people in the entire agency have the authority to unmask the identities of U.S. persons contained in intelligence reports derived from NSA-collected intelligence information.

thats how ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Those 20 only unmask names on specific requests to do so. Rice is the only one who has admitted making those requests and she was supposed to keep that information to herself. Once again, how did the papers get the classified information that SHE requested?

 

[JoeMoma]

There is also no evidence that Trump conspired with the Russians. Let's call it even.

 

[P@triot]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

Since when do you people care about "evidence"?!? There is no evidence that Russia "stole" the election but that hasn't stopped you people from pushing that false narrative.

 

[P@triot]

MSNBC experts all say the same. She broke no laws. Just doing her job.

Funniest sentence ever posted on USMB. MSNBC doesn't have experts - and if they did - they wouldn't tell the truth anyway. What MSNBC has is bat-shit crazy ideologues with an agenda.

 

[Siete]

There is also no evidence that Trump conspired with the Russians. Let's call it even.

undertimined as yet, the investigation is ongoing.

write that down.

 

[Ted Frazier]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Was the name of anyone specific given to the media?

 

[Ted Frazier]

MSNBC experts all say the same. She broke no laws. Just doing her job.

Funniest sentence ever posted on USMB. MSNBC doesn't have experts - and if they did - they wouldn't tell the truth anyway. What MSNBC has is bat-shit crazy ideologues with an agenda.

Says the lover of Judge Napolitano. Gotta love those Fox experts!

 

[Ted Frazier]

As you may recall, Donald Trump was relentlessly fact-checked after claiming (without evidence) that his phones had been wiretapped in the Trump Tower.
The fact-checks have begun regarding another baseless claim: that Susan Rice committed a crime by requesting the unmasking of people in contact with Russian agents under surveillance.

New York Times (4/5//2017):
Trump, Citing No Evidence, Suggests Susan Rice Committed Crime

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/trump-interview-susan-rice.html

CNN (4/6/2017): Donald Trump says Susan Rice broke the law. His evidence? Nothing. - CNNPolitics.com

So explain how people she had unmasked ended up in news reports, disclosure of classified information is a felony. BTW the person who makes a specific request to unmask US citizens aren't supposed to share those names with anyone else.

Section 7.2(c) of USSID 18 permits the “unmasking” of a U.S. person’s identity if it is necessary to understand the foreign intelligence information or assess its importance. Specifically, this provision outlines several possible justifications upon which the government can rely to claim the unmasking was necessary, such as if the information indicates the U.S. person is an agent of a foreign power, is engaged in the unauthorized disclosure of classified information, may be involved in a crime, or may be the target of hostile intelligence activities of a foreign power.


Rice was within the law. She was doing her job.

Deal with it and bite one.

Only one that appears to have made an unauthorized disclosure of classified information is Rice. How else would the papers get the names and circumstances?

Trump's accusation in the article is not about leaking anything to the media. The accusation is that Rice committed a crime by seeking to find out the names of those speaking to Russians .
The accusation is so weak that you had to change the alleged crime from "unmasking request" to "media leaks".
Before you comment on the thread, learn how to read the articles mentioned in that thread.