GoneBezerk
Rookie
- May 14, 2011
- 7,603
- 493
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
It's clear you are in an insane asylum.
You are hilarious! The START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) has nothing to do with the rotation of the earth favoring a missile launched from the WESTERN USA hitting China before one launched from China hit the USA. It is the rotation of the earth which influences strike.Idiot, china isn't part of START.
China doesn't mind if Obamination lowers our nukes with "promises" from Russia doing the same or slightly less like they typically do.
A dew facts which belie the rightwing claims:
******************************************
The Pentagon's press secretary, George Little, declined to comment on specific force level options because they are classified. He said Obama had asked the Pentagon to develop several "alternative approaches" to nuclear deterrence.
The U.S. could make further weapons reductions on its own but is seen as more likely to propose a new round of arms negotiations with Russia, in which cuts in deployed weapons would be one element in a possible new treaty between the former Cold War adversaries.
Stephen Young, senior analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, which favors nuclear arms reductions, said Tuesday, "The administration is absolutely correct to look at deep cuts like this. The United States does not rely on nuclear weapons as a central part of our security."