occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,185
- 1,590
Idiot, if we lower our numbers to say 4, Russia to 6, and China to 4....we are losing the ability to counter "both" threats.
Throw in Iran getting nukes along with NK's nukes.
It's clear your tiny brain doesn't understand deterrence.
Yeah, Russia and China are our friends and don't have nukes.
Iran is also one of our buddies too.....eh?
Typical all or nothing response, Who is talking about getting rid of them? I am suggesting that the ready capability for total Armageddon is a useless waste of money and resources. We almost certainly have the capability to destroy the bulk of mankind several times over, we could lose much of it and still maintain an acceptable balance of terror for scared people like yourself.
Looking around I noticed that we have a treaty limit of 1550 deployed nuclear warheads. They are considering plans to cut to 1,000 to 1,100, 700 to 800, and 300 to 400, Even at the lowest, 300 warheads that will never happen, What could anyone do with 300 nukes? Gasp! we would be practically defenseless.