Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?Why would you say something that so easy to check out? You think because you don't know how to use Google, no one else does? Why does your kind do this all the time? We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total. This has been common knowledge for 10 years. 10 fucking years everyone has known this, but you don't? How can you have the nerve to write on this board and not know that?The goal of the GOP, for decades, is to redistribute the wealth of the nation to the top 1%.
Is that why the Bush tax cuts for the bottom 99% were so much bigger than for the top 1%?
We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.
Link?
OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.
The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.
That's you answer? The rich received less?
Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.
We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.
Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.