Number One Question at GOP Debate: Why should America vote Republican?

[Toddsterpatriot]

The goal of the GOP, for decades, is to redistribute the wealth of the nation to the top 1%.

Is that why the Bush tax cuts for the bottom 99% were so much bigger than for the top 1%?

Why would you say something that so easy to check out? You think because you don't know how to use Google, no one else does? Why does your kind do this all the time? We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total. This has been common knowledge for 10 years. 10 fucking years everyone has known this, but you don't? How can you have the nerve to write on this board and not know that?

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Link?

You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?

OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.

The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.

That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?

That's you answer? The rich received less?

Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.

 

[MathewSmith]

Unfortunately, now it's really hard to differ Republicans from the big money donor scumbags. But as it turns out most people don't vote their pocketbooks. They vote their tribal values.

 

[Harry Dresden]

The goal of the GOP, for decades, is to redistribute the wealth of the nation to the top 1%.

Is that why the Bush tax cuts for the bottom 99% were so much bigger than for the top 1%?

Why would you say something that so easy to check out? You think because you don't know how to use Google, no one else does? Why does your kind do this all the time? We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total. This has been common knowledge for 10 years. 10 fucking years everyone has known this, but you don't? How can you have the nerve to write on this board and not know that?

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Link?

You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?

OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.

i have been daring you to prove what you said about me....all i get is dean talk....

That you live in the basement? It's common knowledge.

whats the matter dean?...cant back up what you said?..kind of puts you in the same boat as all those righties you say lie...and hey dumbass,there are no basements in california....so there is another "claim" you cant back up.... dean talk...bullshit with every sentence....

 

[rdean]

that 1% is richer under Obama and Democrats then they were under Republicans

that bottom 47% had it better under Republicans and are worse off under Democrats

libs are losers who lie to themselves

The fact that Democrats support education and Republicans want to slash education and there are over 5 million jobs available to people with education proves you are an idiot. There is no doubt.

 

[rdean]

Why would you say something that so easy to check out? You think because you don't know how to use Google, no one else does? Why does your kind do this all the time? We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total. This has been common knowledge for 10 years. 10 fucking years everyone has known this, but you don't? How can you have the nerve to write on this board and not know that?

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Link?

You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?

OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.

The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.

That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?

That's you answer? The rich received less?

Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.

I'm just amazed. The Bush Tax Cuts have been the subject of hundreds if not thousands of threads and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes? If after all this time and after all these threads you still don't know, you won't believe anything I come up with. You are already one of the determined ignorant.

 

[ScienceRocks]

As of right now I promise not to. Fuck that party!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Link?

You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?

OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.

The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.

That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?

That's you answer? The rich received less?

Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.

I'm just amazed. The Bush Tax Cuts have been the subject of hundreds if not thousands of threads and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes? If after all this time and after all these threads you still don't know, you won't believe anything I come up with. You are already one of the determined ignorant.

and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes?

No.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

I want proof of your claim that the top 20% received 73% of the total tax cut and the top 1% received 30% of the total tax cut.

 

[rdean]

You mean you really don't know that? Seriously?

OK, before I post that, I'm curious. What to you think the percentages are? Tell me you don't know. I dare you.

The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.

That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?

That's you answer? The rich received less?

Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.

I'm just amazed. The Bush Tax Cuts have been the subject of hundreds if not thousands of threads and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes? If after all this time and after all these threads you still don't know, you won't believe anything I come up with. You are already one of the determined ignorant.

and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes?

No.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

I want proof of your claim that the top 20% received 73% of the total tax cut and the top 1% received 30% of the total tax cut.

You must be a moron. I swear. If you paid a hundred thousand in taxes and got back 10% you would get $10,000.00 as a return. If you paid a thousand dollars, you would get back a hundred dollars.

If your job got moved to China, you would be lucky to get back anything.

Imagine how much you would get back if you were a billionaire?

Get the picture?

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Number one question at the GOP debate should ask why Americans should vote Republican?

Won't be for health care.

Won't be for education.

Won't be for infrastructure.

Won't be for jobs.

Won't be for peace.

Won't be to close the income gap.

So why? What is the reason?

Won't be to protect voter's rights.

Won't be to support women's rights.

Won't be to support gay rights.

Will the question be asked at the GOP debate? What kind of answer will we get?

-Healthcare: "If you like your plan, you can keep it." Annual costs for an American Family will go down by $2,500 per year.

- Education: Republicans are the ones with a program to take poor children out of dangerous, underperforming schools. What have Democrats done except for calling for more money and getting worse results?

- Infrastructure: Free Enterprise drives infrastructure (Translation: "The more business owners building THAT, the more infrastructure we have)

- Jobs: Democrats keep touting "jobs" in the face of the Nation's worst labor participation rate. How can Republicans do any worse?

- Income Gap: Income gap is no worse, no better under the past 8 years of Democrat rule. The Income Gap debate is the vehicle used by Socialists and Communists so they can eliminate the Middle Class and simply have the masses who think everything is "fair" as a true 1% elite is locked in. Economic policies rooted in class envy are failures.

-

 

[rdean]

The Number one question at the GOP debate should ask why Americans should vote Republican?

Won't be for health care.

Won't be for education.

Won't be for infrastructure.

Won't be for jobs.

Won't be for peace.

Won't be to close the income gap.

So why? What is the reason?

Won't be to protect voter's rights.

Won't be to support women's rights.

Won't be to support gay rights.

Will the question be asked at the GOP debate? What kind of answer will we get?

-Healthcare: "If you like your plan, you can keep it." Annual costs for an American Family will go down by $2,500 per year.

- Education: Republicans are the ones with a program to take poor children out of dangerous, underperforming schools. What have Democrats done except for calling for more money and getting worse results?

- Infrastructure: Free Enterprise drives infrastructure (Translation: "The more business owners building THAT, the more infrastructure we have)

- Jobs: Democrats keep touting "jobs" in the face of the Nation's worst labor participation rate. How can Republicans do any worse?

- Income Gap: Income gap is no worse, no better under the past 8 years of Democrat rule. The Income Gap debate is the vehicle used by Socialists and Communists so they can eliminate the Middle Class and simply have the masses who think everything is "fair" as a true 1% elite is locked in. Economic policies rooted in class envy are failures.

-

Why do you want to push failed policies. Republicans built the interstate highways. Not private enterprise.
And there are over 5,000,000 jobs available right now and ready to be filled but companies can't find people with the skills to do those jobs. That's why they want immigrants.
But Republicans want to slash education right and left. The figures have been posted on this website again and again. Republicans keep crying about jobs.
Hello, knock knock, these days you need skills. That means education. That leaves out Republicans.

 

[Kondor3]

The Number one question at the GOP debate should ask why Americans should vote Republican?...

There are many reasons.

...Won't be for health care...

Other than those being given freebie or subsidzed health-care on the taxpayer's dime, a great many other folks aren't happy with loss of policies, higher premiums, etc.

...Won't be for education...

Won't be for Common Core, either.

...Won't be for infrastructure...

Won't be for a resurrected Public Works Administration, either.

...Won't be for jobs...

True.

The Republicans lie their asses off and do nothing about this, and send jobs overseas at the speed of light.

Then again, Trump is forcing them to look at the Outsourcing and Offshoring, using his big mouth, and, if they resort to draconian measures, might actually bring many jobs back.

Doubtful, but at least the Republican side is talking about it now - complete with tariffs, etc.

...Won't be for peace...

Rumor has it that Obumble - like Jimmah Abdul Carter - has allowed the military to deteriorate on his watch, so, we probably won't be going to war anytime soon, anyway.

...Won't be to close the income gap...

Between whom and whom?

...So why? What is the reason?...

Because the Pubs are the Un-Cola... the Un-Democrats... the alternative, when the Other Guys have had too long a turn at the wheel, and have spent us into the ground again.

...Won't be to protect voter's rights...

Sure it will.

Pubs are just as interested as Dems in Voter's Rights. It's that they want to be sure that only Legally Registered and Identifiable Voters get to have a say.

Grand idea.

...Won't be to support women's rights...

Depends on what you call Womens RIghts.

If that's Code-Speak for Abortion, well, that option will continue to exist, moving forward, although it will be more difficult to obtain one, but there are a great many women opposed to Abortion, as well as various men, and Pubs, like Dems, vary in both their support and opposition to Abortion, in circumstance and degree.

...Won't be to support gay rights...

True. Sexual deviancy and perversity (homosexuality) should not be legitimized nor mainstreamed, despite recent judicial-activist rulings to the contrary.

...Will the question be asked at the GOP debate? What kind of answer will we get?

Q: Has American had a belly-full of the goddamned Democrats and their autocratic leader's Rule-by-Imperial-Decree (EOs) and Social-Engineering-at-Gunpoint?

A: Yep. Damned straight.

-----------------------------------

Hope that helps.

 

[LeftofLeft]

The Number one question at the GOP debate should ask why Americans should vote Republican?

Won't be for health care.

Won't be for education.

Won't be for infrastructure.

Won't be for jobs.

Won't be for peace.

Won't be to close the income gap.

So why? What is the reason?

Won't be to protect voter's rights.

Won't be to support women's rights.

Won't be to support gay rights.

Will the question be asked at the GOP debate? What kind of answer will we get?

-Healthcare: "If you like your plan, you can keep it." Annual costs for an American Family will go down by $2,500 per year.

- Education: Republicans are the ones with a program to take poor children out of dangerous, underperforming schools. What have Democrats done except for calling for more money and getting worse results?

- Infrastructure: Free Enterprise drives infrastructure (Translation: "The more business owners building THAT, the more infrastructure we have)

- Jobs: Democrats keep touting "jobs" in the face of the Nation's worst labor participation rate. How can Republicans do any worse?

- Income Gap: Income gap is no worse, no better under the past 8 years of Democrat rule. The Income Gap debate is the vehicle used by Socialists and Communists so they can eliminate the Middle Class and simply have the masses who think everything is "fair" as a true 1% elite is locked in. Economic policies rooted in class envy are failures.

-

Why do you want to push failed policies. Republicans built the interstate highways. Not private enterprise.
And there are over 5,000,000 jobs available right now and ready to be filled but companies can't find people with the skills to do those jobs. That's why they want immigrants.
But Republicans want to slash education right and left. The figures have been posted on this website again and again. Republicans keep crying about jobs.
Hello, knock knock, these days you need skills. That means education. That leaves out Republicans.

Private enterprise drives infrastructure. Infrastructure can stimulate more private enterprise but not sustain it.

Most everyone wants LEGAL immigration. You want skills and more education, why then do Democrats simply call for more money, using the District of Columbia as an example, highest per pupil expenditure just north of $32k per year, and get same results? Money and "fair share" mantra is not going to solely solve the problem. Accountability from the top administrators to the individual student is a good start. How is that money being spent and what are the results? Is their complete transparency? How about incentives and programs to provide people with skills in exchange for service like the military does? How about Government, Education, Corporations, and Labor work together and leave out the money grab? Stop using Education as the card to grab money and start evaluating how money is being spent vs. The results.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The rich received less of the cut than the share they paid of the total.
That's why they pay more of the total now than before the cuts.
But by all means, prove the numbers you claimed.

That's you answer? The rich received less? Based on nothing? How can right wingers support something they know nothing about? How is that possible?

That's you answer? The rich received less?

Yes. Bush cut everyone's taxes. The lower end of the earners received a larger tax cut than the higher end.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

Before you run away, still waiting for your proof.

I'm just amazed. The Bush Tax Cuts have been the subject of hundreds if not thousands of threads and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes? If after all this time and after all these threads you still don't know, you won't believe anything I come up with. You are already one of the determined ignorant.

and you are still wanting "proof" of the percentage that the rich pay in taxes?

No.

We already know the top 20% received 73% of the Total and the top 1% received 30% of the total.

I want proof of your claim that the top 20% received 73% of the total tax cut and the top 1% received 30% of the total tax cut.

You must be a moron. I swear. If you paid a hundred thousand in taxes and got back 10% you would get $10,000.00 as a return. If you paid a thousand dollars, you would get back a hundred dollars.

If your job got moved to China, you would be lucky to get back anything.

Imagine how much you would get back if you were a billionaire?

Get the picture?

I want proof of your claim that the top 20% received 73% of the total tax cut and the top 1% received 30% of the total tax cut.

Get the picture?