Nuclear revolution

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,622
138
A revolution against Eurocentrism is brewing in the US.
Which side will have the advantage of a nuclear attack? I think that the Europeans will never agree to use nuclear weapons, even against America. European agents are afraid of nuclear fire, for them it is like the Sun, which will destroy them.
For the Americans, there is nothing dangerous in this, open nuclear tests were conducted in Nevada, radiation is only good. The main thing is not to get inside the explosion itself.

Open nuclear explosions have been banned since the Caribbean crisis, when Eurocentrists came to power.

Nuclear weapons are America's trump card against foreign agents.

And besides, you can simply resume open nuclear explosions, this will also harm the agents and strengthen the United States.
 
A revolution against Eurocentrism is brewing in the US.
The subject invariably includes north America which makes a nonsense of your OP .

Regardless , if you arbitrarily remove NA just on geographical grounds ( why? ) , your statement is simply opinion and far from demonstrated fact .

What then follows is at best suspect because it has long been realised by experts that Russia's arsenal is now greater than the one allegedly held by the US , and, regardless, Russia is infinitely better prepared to withstand a nuclear attack . Disastrous though it will be to both and the rest of the planet .
DYOR .
 
A revolution against Eurocentrism is brewing in the US.
Which side will have the advantage of a nuclear attack? I think that the Europeans will never agree to use nuclear weapons, even against America. European agents are afraid of nuclear fire, for them it is like the Sun, which will destroy them.
For the Americans, there is nothing dangerous in this, open nuclear tests were conducted in Nevada, radiation is only good. The main thing is not to get inside the explosion itself.

Open nuclear explosions have been banned since the Caribbean crisis, when Eurocentrists came to power.

Nuclear weapons are America's trump card against foreign agents.

And besides, you can simply resume open nuclear explosions, this will also harm the agents and strengthen the United States.
The only European countries that posses nuclear arms are the UK and France - totaling around 400 warheads. - Russia is not a European country but belongs to the construct of Eurasia - so WTF are you talking about?
Your and Trumps loony buddy from N-Korea - is enough to destroy the USA. - I mean destroy - not annihilate.
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The subject invariably includes north America which makes a nonsense of your OP .

Regardless , if you arbitrarily remove NA just on geographical grounds ( why? ) , your statement is simply opinion and far from demonstrated fact .

What then follows is at best suspect because it has long been realised by experts that Russia's arsenal is now greater than the one allegedly held by the US , and, regardless, Russia is infinitely better prepared to withstand a nuclear attack . Disastrous though it will be to both and the rest of the planet .
DYOR .
This is absolute nonsense. I read official sources and military reviews, everywhere they publish data about the superiority of the United States in the number of warheads, about 2 times, moreover, the situation with warhead carriers is not entirely clear. Rocket engines have not been supplied since 2014, and there are very few nuclear submarines in the Russian Federation. How will they deliver them? And they do not have such missile defense as in the USA, I have not heard about such projects, have you heard?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
The only European countries that posses nuclear arms are the UK and France - totaling around 400 warheads. - Russia is not a European country but belongs to the construct of Eurasia - so WTF are you talking about?
Your and Trumps loony buddy from N-Korea - is enough to destroy the USA. - I mean destroy - not annihilate.
The Russian Federation is politically a European country that is part of the Eurocentric bloc.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
banana 777
Not even 2 times. Here are approximate figures: as of 2010, the United States had more than 5,000 warheads, as of 2018, the Russian Armed Forces had less than 1500

This is more than 3 times at least
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
banana 777
But I repeat, here it is necessary to take into account the means of delivery.

If my memory serves me right in the USA, the main means of delivery are submarines, and everything is fine with them. In the Russian Federation, the main means are ballistic missiles. Are they updated since 2014? Rocket engines were made in Ukraine. Where do they buy them now?
 
The Russian Federation is politically a European country that is part of the Eurocentric bloc.
What is a "Politically European Country"?
If Russia is part of the Eurocentric bloc - then why is the entire "Eurocentric bloc" boycotting and sanctioning Russia?
 
banana 777
Not even 2 times. Here are approximate figures: as of 2010, the United States had more than 5,000 warheads, as of 2018, the Russian Armed Forces had less than 1500

This is more than 3 times at least
You are wrong. The USA:
IMG_20230603_024343.jpg



Russia:

IMG_20230603_023946_528.jpg


Conclusion (from unclassified ATA report)
IMG_20230603_024142_212.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230603_023946_528.jpg
    IMG_20230603_023946_528.jpg
    192.5 KB · Views: 10
It makes no sense at all for the Russian Federation to increase the number of warheads, because an increase in launch vehicles is impossible.
 
It makes no sense at all for the Russian Federation to increase the number of warheads, because an increase in launch vehicles is impossible.
Who said that?
By the way, how good are your Russian skills?

In this new cover of the popular Russian song "The missiles are flying away slowly" they mentioned a new toxic gas, prononced like "Tyckmykdyk" or something. What do you hear and how it should be written?
 
Who said that?
This is self-evident. Rocket engines for rockets of the USSR and the Russian Federation have always been produced only in Ukraine.
There is no information that an enterprise of this level exists anywhere else.
 
Silver Cat
At the same time, the main part of the ICBM is the engine. Everything else is worthless. Only the shell and electronics remain.
At the same time, all the main parts of any electronics - chips and processors - are developed only in California.
 
What is a "Politically European Country"?
If Russia is part of the Eurocentric bloc - then why is the entire "Eurocentric bloc" boycotting and sanctioning Russia?
In fact, the EU does nothing, they only buy Ukrainian children for German pedophiles. These are empty words.
Berlin openly declares that cooperation with Germany and Moscow will kill America. They are trying to lift the restrictions of pan-Germanism, they are trying to take over Austria.
The terrorist Prigozhin uses exclusively German symbols.
Historically, the Russian Empire has always been a pillar of Eurocentrism.

The propaganda and ideology of the Kremlin preaches exclusively European values and glorifies the exclusively Prussian version of the history of Russia, the 18th century, which was under the Prussian boot.

The law in the Russian Federation is European, the values are Eurocentric, the Russian Federation, contrary to the constitution, has a moratorium on the death penalty, and so on.

Russia is the main guarantor of Europe's energy security, the main source of raw materials for the EU.

The Kremlin's policy is exclusively Eurocentric. Changes in the constitution are pursuing a policy of strengthening Eurocentrism.
 
This is the Chernobyl reactor. These stalkers freely walk around the epicenter. The supposedly "infected" block has no effect, they even bathe in the water that was poured into this reactor during the liquidation of the accident.
 

Forum List

Back
Top