- Thread starter
- #61
And what would have been the result of these citizens being armed in that specific case, where as these cops claimed that they were being shot at from the bridge, in which they may have figured that they were being shot at in which was very real for them (sad to say), but would the citizens had won the battle if they would have engaged in an all out war with these cops that night (depends) ? Who knows actually, where as it was a traggic situation, yet a very unusual unique situation that was found in the New Orleans melt down along with so many other unusual situations as well (the blame game), so I ain't so sure if this would be a good example for the anti-gun control crowd to be using in the overall "New Orleans" ordeal. Alot of speculation can insue in all of this, but does it all apply to the gun control issue in this nation in a blanketing way ? ((NOPE))Citizens were murdered as a direct result of the police dis-arming them in New Orleans, otherwise letting them be left to the wolves once cleared an area, and then the wolves returned later and found the citizens without their guns ?
No New Orleans police shot and killed unarmed citizens.
I will remain armed and die that way than die the way those unarmed citizens of New Orleans did. At least armed I can take a few bad cops with me.