NRA Never Again

[whitehall]

There was a time when even democrat politicians proudly claimed that they were members of the NRA. JFK was even a life member. Alas , today the left wing has been conditioned by the liberal media like Pavlov's dogs. Mention the NRA and the left salivates.

Let's them salivate hopefully they'll drown on their juices

Nice try at a pun but my point is that the democrat party (and the liberal media) has evolved to the point that they respond to stimulus rather than taking the time to think. There was a time when all US presidents celebrated the 2nd Amendment and endorsed the NRA's effort at training and gun safety. Today it's all Pavlov. Mention the NRA and the radical knees immediately jerk.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

There was a time when even democrat politicians proudly claimed that they were members of the NRA. JFK was even a life member. Alas , today the left wing has been conditioned by the liberal media like Pavlov's dogs. Mention the NRA and the left salivates.

Let's them salivate hopefully they'll drown on their juices

Nice try at a pun but my point is that the democrat party (and the liberal media) has evolved to the point that they respond to stimulus rather than taking the time to think. There was a time when all US presidents celebrated the 2nd Amendment and endorsed the NRA's effort at training and gun safety. Today it's all Pavlov. Mention the NRA and the radical knees immediately jerk.

You notice how quite gun grabbers are after the facts of the mass shooting at the empire state building have been released?

 

[rightwinger]

Who says the government will never take your guns? It's happen before but I refuse to allow it to happen to me.



NRA Never Again - Part 1 of 2 - YouTube

That's what happens when you elect a Republican as President....Gun Confiscation

Or a democratic mayor who appointed this man

No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/28/national/nationalspecial/28storm.html?_r=1

Where were the Feds?

Was Bush a complete no-show during Katrina?

Second Amendment rights being violated and Bush stands there like a pussy. Obama would have stood up for gun rights.....Not Republicans

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's what happens when you elect a Republican as President....Gun Confiscation

Or a democratic mayor who appointed this man

No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/28/national/nationalspecial/28storm.html?_r=1

Where were the Feds?

Was Bush a complete no-show during Katrina?

Second Amendment rights being violated and Bush stands there like a pussy. Obama would have stood up for gun rights.....Not Republicans

Goes to show how closely bush and obama support the same issues.

 

[rightwinger]

Could be coming to a neighborhood close to you.

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms - Forbes

I'm skeered

UN is gonna take our guns

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

 

[beagle9]

Some did not, nevertheless that matters not they should never had their firearms taken away period.

I can agree, but for the saftey of some in various situations (like the little ole lady for example), but not in the unmanored way in which it was done to her in that video, but even so I think it was a good thing.

I mean what would she had done if threatened by criminals who wanted to take her food in that situation ? Nothing is what she would have done, that would have been safe and good for her to do. Lets say that maybe she could have shot a round off or two (you know to scare the perps), but then the others would have heard these shots, and thought to themselves a vulnerable little ole lady with a gun? Then they would have went there not for her food or for her dogs, but for that gun, in order to commit bigger crimes as a team found in gangs roaming the communities in that situiation. Once an area was come upon by law enforcement for clearing, then the gun owners who were in that area, should have been able to leave with their guns to a safe zone, and if they were uncertain about taking their weapons with them, then there should have been provisions provided them by the law, to store their weapons until they chose to pick them back up at a later date. Somewhere in this nation, trust has to be formed between the law and the good citizens again, because this is the huge problem this nation is having in all of this to date. NO TRUST ANYMORE!

Dude why have any firearms if you think tuning them in is a good thing? That is exactly when you need them when you think for safety you must turn them in.
WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please comprehend my entire post, and then comment back, because I think I make a lot of sense in sort of finding some sort of common ground between the gun owners and the law in such a situation. Being stupid never solves anything, so it pays to be smart always. Not saying your stupid at all, but just saying it is best to rationalize everything out, and then come up with the proper solutions to these situations. Anti-Trust of the government has reached critical levels in this nation, and it shows within these threads now. Hey I am critical or suspicious of the government also in this nation, and yet it is still not a lost cause to try and win the government back through elections, instead of pushing it further and further away by losing it in these elections.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I can agree, but for the saftey of some in various situations (like the little ole lady for example), but not in the unmanored way in which it was done to her in that video, but even so I think it was a good thing.

I mean what would she had done if threatened by criminals who wanted to take her food in that situation ? Nothing is what she would have done, that would have been safe and good for her to do. Lets say that maybe she could have shot a round off or two (you know to scare the perps), but then the others would have heard these shots, and thought to themselves a vulnerable little ole lady with a gun? Then they would have went there not for her food or for her dogs, but for that gun, in order to commit bigger crimes as a team found in gangs roaming the communities in that situiation. Once an area was come upon by law enforcement for clearing, then the gun owners who were in that area, should have been able to leave with their guns to a safe zone, and if they were uncertain about taking their weapons with them, then there should have been provisions provided them by the law, to store their weapons until they chose to pick them back up at a later date. Somewhere in this nation, trust has to be formed between the law and the good citizens again, because this is the huge problem this nation is having in all of this to date. NO TRUST ANYMORE!

Dude why have any firearms if you think tuning them in is a good thing? That is exactly when you need them when you think for safety you must turn them in.
WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please comprehend my entire post, and then comment back, because I think I make a lot of sense in sort of finding some sort of common ground between the gun owners and the law in such a situation. Being stupid never solves anything, so it pays to be smart always. Not saying your stupid at all, but just saying it is best to rationalize everything out, and then come up with the proper solutions to these situations. Anti-Trust of the government has reached critical levels in this nation, and it shows within these threads now. Hey I am critical or suspicious of the government also in this nation, and yet it is still not a lost cause to try and win the government back through elections, instead of pushing it further and further away by losing it in these elections.

I am sorry but I cannot get past the part where you say turn your guns in for safe keeping, after that everything goes blank.

 

[beagle9]

Could be coming to a neighborhood close to you.

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms - Forbes

I'm skeered

UN is gonna take our guns

snopes.com: U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

I believe if we were more docile than what we have been over the last 50 years, then anything could happen, just as much as some crazy things have already happened over these years, in which no one would had ever thought possible to happen but did.

 

[beagle9]

Dude why have any firearms if you think tuning them in is a good thing? That is exactly when you need them when you think for safety you must turn them in.
WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please comprehend my entire post, and then comment back, because I think I make a lot of sense in sort of finding some sort of common ground between the gun owners and the law in such a situation. Being stupid never solves anything, so it pays to be smart always. Not saying your stupid at all, but just saying it is best to rationalize everything out, and then come up with the proper solutions to these situations. Anti-Trust of the government has reached critical levels in this nation, and it shows within these threads now. Hey I am critical or suspicious of the government also in this nation, and yet it is still not a lost cause to try and win the government back through elections, instead of pushing it further and further away by losing it in these elections.

I am sorry but I cannot get past the part where you say turn your guns in for safe keeping, after that everything goes blank.

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Please comprehend my entire post, and then comment back, because I think I make a lot of sense in sort of finding some sort of common ground between the gun owners and the law in such a situation. Being stupid never solves anything, so it pays to be smart always. Not saying your stupid at all, but just saying it is best to rationalize everything out, and then come up with the proper solutions to these situations. Anti-Trust of the government has reached critical levels in this nation, and it shows within these threads now. Hey I am critical or suspicious of the government also in this nation, and yet it is still not a lost cause to try and win the government back through elections, instead of pushing it further and further away by losing it in these elections.

I am sorry but I cannot get past the part where you say turn your guns in for safe keeping, after that everything goes blank.

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

Some people got them back some did not some had them destroyed on the spot by police.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Even though the police were convicted of their murders that will not bring back those killed nor the trust they took when they disarmed the people of New Orleans.

 

[beagle9]

I am sorry but I cannot get past the part where you say turn your guns in for safe keeping, after that everything goes blank.

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

Some people got them back some did not some had them destroyed on the spot by police.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Even though the police were convicted of their murders that will not bring back those killed nor the trust they took when they disarmed the people of New Orleans.

Citizens were murdered as a direct result of the police dis-arming them in New Orleans, otherwise letting them be left to the wolves once cleared an area, and then the wolves returned later and found the citizens without their guns ?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Smile, just keep it all in context, but you might be right that it may not be a good idea to trust the law or the government these days (no matter what the special circumstances are), especially if the government does not give these weapons back afterwards.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Some people got them back some did not some had them destroyed on the spot by police.

We do have a huge anti-trust issue in this nation in which is causing all of this mess to date. The only way to solve it I think, is to elect the right people into government again. It is the only way to go foward, but still common sense and smarts have to go hand in hand on these issues for the good citizens to prevail.

Even though the police were convicted of their murders that will not bring back those killed nor the trust they took when they disarmed the people of New Orleans.

Citizens were murdered as a direct result of the police dis-arming them in New Orleans, otherwise letting them be left to the wolves once cleared an area, and then the wolves returned later and found the citizens without their guns ?

No New Orleans police shot and killed unarmed citizens.

 

[Borillar]

There was a time when even democrat politicians proudly claimed that they were members of the NRA. JFK was even a life member. Alas , today the left wing has been conditioned by the liberal media like Pavlov's dogs. Mention the NRA and the left salivates.

Kind of like the right with the ACLU?

 

[Harry Dresden]

That's what happens when you elect a Republican as President....Gun Confiscation

Or a democratic mayor who appointed this man

No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/28/national/nationalspecial/28storm.html?_r=1

Where were the Feds?

Was Bush a complete no-show during Katrina?

Second Amendment rights being violated and Bush stands there like a pussy. Obama would have stood up for gun rights.....Not Republicans

how do you know?.....

 

[uscitizen]

Obama must have been responsible for Katrina. some way....

 

[beagle9]

Some people got them back some did not some had them destroyed on the spot by police.



Even though the police were convicted of their murders that will not bring back those killed nor the trust they took when they disarmed the people of New Orleans.

Citizens were murdered as a direct result of the police dis-arming them in New Orleans, otherwise letting them be left to the wolves once cleared an area, and then the wolves returned later and found the citizens without their guns ?

No New Orleans police shot and killed unarmed citizens.

And what would have been the result of these citizens being armed in that specific case, where as these cops claimed that they were being shot at from the bridge, in which they may have figured that they were being shot at in which was very real for them (sad to say), but would the citizens had won the battle if they would have engaged in an all out war with these cops that night (depends) ? Who knows actually, where as it was a traggic situation, yet a very unusual unique situation that was found in the New Orleans melt down along with so many other unusual situations as well (the blame game), so I ain't so sure if this would be a good example for the anti-gun control crowd to be using in the overall "New Orleans" ordeal. Alot of speculation can insue in all of this, but does it all apply to the gun control issue in this nation in a blanketing way ? ((NOPE))

 

[rightwinger]

Or a democratic mayor who appointed this man

No civilians in New Orleans will be allowed to carry pistols, shotguns or other firearms, said P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police. "Only law enforcement are allowed to have weapons," he said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/28/national/nationalspecial/28storm.html?_r=1

Where were the Feds?

Was Bush a complete no-show during Katrina?

Second Amendment rights being violated and Bush stands there like a pussy. Obama would have stood up for gun rights.....Not Republicans

how do you know?.....

Didn't see any gun confiscations while Obama was President

 

[beagle9]

There was a time when even democrat politicians proudly claimed that they were members of the NRA. JFK was even a life member. Alas , today the left wing has been conditioned by the liberal media like Pavlov's dogs. Mention the NRA and the left salivates.

Kind of like the right with the ACLU?

That's one group of idiots I have no use for, so I guess I am a RW according to you, and this by your radar you carry on board with you at all times I guess.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Where were the Feds?

Was Bush a complete no-show during Katrina?

Second Amendment rights being violated and Bush stands there like a pussy. Obama would have stood up for gun rights.....Not Republicans

how do you know?.....

Didn't see any gun confiscations while Obama was President

I hate gun grabbing zealous doctors who can take a person gun and obama ALLOWS IT.
Doomsday Prepper Declared Mental Defective…. Government confiscates his Guns

 

[beagle9]

Obama must have been responsible for Katrina. some way....

Was Obama a member of government back then? If so he probably could have done more, and maybe could have been more visable (might be why Jessie Jackson don't like him), but funny I didn't know or ever hear about an Obama during that time, so where was he ? This guy just pop's up out of no where to become President, and every body was suckered in with his slick speak and ways, along with his skin color in which gained him alot of votes for historical purposes only, but has he delivered and performed properly as the American President since being elected ?

These are the questions and qualities in which he will now be judged upon come November. Let the chips/votes fall where they may is all I can say, and then let us all deal with the win no matter what it is afterwards. Hopefully it is the right choice, because we havn't seen a whole lot of relief in this resession, other than huge give aways to the wrong people or towards the wrong investments, especially when it comes to the gas prices.. wow!! The nation is overly polarized and is highly being disrespected, therefore we must get beyond this somehow, so hopefully it will be the right choice in this nation once it votes again.