- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,412
- 18,712
- 1,915
You went from denying it to trying to justify it.YesAs it is also hypocritical for you to whine about this, while Uncle Harry changed rules when convenient.It is beyond HYPOCRITICAL that NaziCons now want to abolish the Senate filibuster. They don't like it when BOTH sides can play the same silly fucking un-American games.
Cam you link me the thread where you bitched about him?
STFU
Did Harry ever try to use the so-called "nuclear option" to end filibustering?
10/07/11 01:10 AM EDT
In a shocking development Thursday evening, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) triggered a rarely used procedural option informally called the “nuclear option” to change the Senate rules.
Reid and 50 members of his caucus voted to change Senate rules unilaterally to prevent Republicans from forcing votes on uncomfortable amendments after the chamber has voted to move to final passage of a bill.
Reid’s coup passed by a vote of 51-48, leaving Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) fuming.
Reid triggers nuclear option to change Senate rules end repeat filibusters TheHill
Now answer my question, you dishonest fuck.
Where is your thread bitching about it
Wow, for a so-called Christian you sure are a nasty little fucker. I forgive you...
Why Harry Reid Had to Use the ‘Nuclear Option’ - The New York Times
I warned then that this would happen if the GOP gained control of the Senate.
Each and every time the Democrats muck with the system to pass their radical ideology onto the rest of us, you can count on that same behavior from the GOP.
That is why in the past (before that criminal Reid gained control of the Senate) both parties took extraordinary care to keep the rules intact so that the free for all would not be used against them in the future.
Now, live with the consequences of your immature pandering.