SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
.
Seems to me the first problem is agreeing on the freakin' data.
We can't have a constructive conversation on climate change when both "sides" of the debate bring entirely different data to the table. One day I'll hear the earth is cooling, the next day I'll hear the earth is warming.
As usual, both "sides" need to grow the fuck up and get over themselves.
.
What is your take? Which "side" do you fall on?
While I am not in any way activist on this issue, I am convinced that we are experiencing climate change and that our activities are contributing to it.
Based on what hard, observed, repeatable data? Data that actually points a finger towards man's activities rather than vague corelatory data. The one smoking gun, fingerprint of man being the cause was the hot spot in the troposphere and it has never materialized...so what hard data do you base your position on?