North Korea recognized annexed Crimea as "Russian"

Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Well, you know the real Crimeans were deported to Siberia by the Russians to make room for the Russian colonist who you now call the "Crimeans".
+1, 90% Muscovites in Crimea are the illegal settlers , many of them live in Stolen from Tatars houses even today
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
" after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia "


yes, I'm sure that was perfectly legit. Nothing says "free, fair election" like a foreign military controlling it.


You know nothing of Crimea do you? After the violent coup in Kiev, the citizens and their politicians knew damn well their autonomy would be wiped out. Their Russian language would be banned and they would be treated like second class citizens if not worse since they were Ethnic Russians and had been Russian until Khruschev one day decided to give Crimea to the Ukraine during the USSR days.

Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Well, you know the real Crimeans were deported to Siberia by the Russians to make room for the Russian colonist who you now call the "Crimeans".

Crimea's history goes back to 8th Century BCE. The Tartars were deported by Stalin's USSR for supposedly collaborating with the Nazis. BUT Crimea existed long before the deportation by Stalin.
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
" after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia "


yes, I'm sure that was perfectly legit. Nothing says "free, fair election" like a foreign military controlling it.


You know nothing of Crimea do you? After the violent coup in Kiev, the citizens and their politicians knew damn well their autonomy would be wiped out. Their Russian language would be banned and they would be treated like second class citizens if not worse since they were Ethnic Russians and had been Russian until Khruschev one day decided to give Crimea to the Ukraine during the USSR days.

Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Well, you know the real Crimeans were deported to Siberia by the Russians to make room for the Russian colonist who you now call the "Crimeans".

Crimea's history goes back to 8th Century BCE. The Tartars were deported by Stalin's USSR for supposedly collaborating with the Nazis. BUT Crimea existed long before the deportation by Stalin.
Doesn't matter which Russian deported them, they were replaced by Russians you are calling "Crimeans" who voted for Russian rule.
 
Let's remember the history of the Crimean Tartars under the Ottoman Empire shall we? Nasty crew.

The Crimean Khanate, a vassal state of the Ottoman Empire, succeeded the Golden Horde and lasted from 1449 to 1783[29] In 1571, the Crimean Tatars attacked and sacked Moscow, burning everything but the Kremlin. Until the late 18th century, Crimean Tatars maintained a massive slave trade with the Ottoman Empire, exporting about 2 million slaves from Russia and Ukraine over the period 1500–1700

Crimea - Wikipedia
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Well, you know the real Crimeans were deported to Siberia by the Russians to make room for the Russian colonist who you now call the "Crimeans".
+1, 90% Muscovites in Crimea are the illegal settlers , many of them live in Stolen from Tatars houses even today

The fucking Russian Empire beat the Ottoman Empire. They won. It's just the way the cookie crumbled when Empires clash and one wins. Crimeans are no more illegal than any other group on the planet whose side won in war.

Pfft. Calling them illegal. What a bad joke you are.
 
" after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia "


yes, I'm sure that was perfectly legit. Nothing says "free, fair election" like a foreign military controlling it.


You know nothing of Crimea do you? After the violent coup in Kiev, the citizens and their politicians knew damn well their autonomy would be wiped out. Their Russian language would be banned and they would be treated like second class citizens if not worse since they were Ethnic Russians and had been Russian until Khruschev one day decided to give Crimea to the Ukraine during the USSR days.

Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
Nazi's in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. It's old obsolete bullshyt. Laughable if so many like you didn't still promote it.
 
You know nothing of Crimea do you? After the violent coup in Kiev, the citizens and their politicians knew damn well their autonomy would be wiped out. Their Russian language would be banned and they would be treated like second class citizens if not worse since they were Ethnic Russians and had been Russian until Khruschev one day decided to give Crimea to the Ukraine during the USSR days.

Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
Nazi's in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. It's old obsolete bullshyt. Laughable if so many like you didn't still promote it.

We've been down this road so many times before. You admire Bandera. And you have no problem with the Azov Battalion. Enough said.

d0c2fb1723bf9b1792d0a8804e8272da.jpg
 
The House recognized that Kiev had Nazis fighting for them. John McCain just loves his nazi boys. So this amendment must have hurt.

"On June 10, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a bipartisan amendment to the Defense Appropriations Act from Reps. John Conyers Jr., D-Michigan, and Ted Yoho, R-Florida that would block U.S. training of the Azov battalion and would prevent transfer of shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles to fighters in Iraq and Ukraine.

“I am grateful that the House of Representatives unanimously passed my amendments last night to ensure that our military does not train members of the repulsive neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, along with my measures to keep the dangerous and easily trafficked MANPADs out of these unstable regions,” said Conyers on Thursday.

He described Ukraine’s Azov Battalion as a 1,000-man volunteer militia of the Ukrainian National Guard that Foreign Policy Magazine has characterized as “openly neo-Nazi” and “fascist.”

And Azov is not some obscure force. Ukraine’s Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, who oversees Ukraine’s armed militias, announced that Azov troops would be among the first units to be trained by the 300 U.S. military advisers who have been dispatched to Ukraine in a training mission codenamed “Fearless Guardian.”

U.S. House Admits Nazi Role in Ukraine
 
Who fucking cares about Russians, Ukrainians, or Crimea? Fucking waste o' time that should have nothing to do with the U.S.
 
Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
Nazi's in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. It's old obsolete bullshyt. Laughable if so many like you didn't still promote it.

We've been down this road so many times before. You admire Bandera. And you have no problem with the Azov Battalion. Enough said.

d0c2fb1723bf9b1792d0a8804e8272da.jpg
Photos of guys with nationalist flags does not equate to the Ukraine government being controlled by Nazi's. We have photos of Americans with actual Nazi flags at trump rallies and Republican events. Does that mean trump and the Republicans are controlled by Nazi's?
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Well, you know the real Crimeans were deported to Siberia by the Russians to make room for the Russian colonist who you now call the "Crimeans".

Crimea's history goes back to 8th Century BCE. The Tartars were deported by Stalin's USSR for supposedly collaborating with the Nazis. BUT Crimea existed long before the deportation by Stalin.
Doesn't matter which Russian deported them, they were replaced by Russians you are calling "Crimeans" who voted for Russian rule.

They weren't replaced by anybody. The Russification of Crimea had been going on since the 1800's. Bottom line when the Ottoman Empire was beat by the Russians guess freaking what? They took over the territory.
 
I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
Nazi's in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. It's old obsolete bullshyt. Laughable if so many like you didn't still promote it.

We've been down this road so many times before. You admire Bandera. And you have no problem with the Azov Battalion. Enough said.

d0c2fb1723bf9b1792d0a8804e8272da.jpg
Photos of guys with nationalist flags does not equate to the Ukraine government being controlled by Nazi's. We have photos of Americans with actual Nazi flags at trump rallies and Republican events. Does that mean trump and the Republicans are controlled by Nazi's?

Azov Battalion has been recognized by the House as nazis. Not just men with flags. And Moscow Avenue was renamed for the Ukrainians who love their nazi hero Bandera.
 
You know nothing of Crimea do you? After the violent coup in Kiev, the citizens and their politicians knew damn well their autonomy would be wiped out. Their Russian language would be banned and they would be treated like second class citizens if not worse since they were Ethnic Russians and had been Russian until Khruschev one day decided to give Crimea to the Ukraine during the USSR days.

Yeah but the west was ok with throwing out a democratically elected prez because he was pro Russian. That's was ok. But Crimea wanting to bail is bad!

I was and always will be against the coup. I have no idea what on earth came over Obama/Harper/Cameron to think that this action would end well.
It did go well. But first, your contention that the constitutional takeover of the government in Kyiv by the Rada (Parliment) when the corrupt Russian puppet President fled the country and fled to protection in Russia rather than face arrest and trial in Ukraine is a distortion and comes straight out of the Russian propaganda machine.

The new government that took over was quickly endorsed in an internationally monitored election and has since been reinforced and re-endorsed by no less than five more internationally monitored elections.

As complicated as Russian propagandist try to make the situation in Ukraine seem, and to distort the removal of the Russian puppet in Kyiv, it is really not that complicated. The people of Ukraine, both what is considered ethnically Ukraine and those citizens of other ethnicities did not want to become a client state of Russia or a copy of their neighbors in Belarus, excepting for a small minority in a small region in southeastern Ukraine.

Whatever the problems in Ukraine are today, Ukraine has maintained their independence and the efforts by Putin to bring Ukraine into the Russian client state realm failed. Ukraine and the west won. Southeastern Ukraine has become an example of what happens when people rely on Russia. Death, destruction, and poverty. And the once prosperous happy Crimea is no longer a reality and will have to wait decades to see the quality of life return to what it was before it aligned itself with Russia. Southeastern Ukraine and Crimea has been set back a generation and lost all the advancements and progress made and earned over the previous generations and decades.


:lmao:

Putin doesn't want the Nazis in Kiev and you know it. They are losers of a greater magnitude than even I could imagine they would become by relying on the EU.
Nazi's in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. It's old obsolete bullshyt. Laughable if so many like you didn't still promote it.

Conyers and others haven't found it funny.

Ukraine's Neo-Nazis Won't Get U.S. Money
What happens to the far-right militia when this round of fighting ends?
by
Leonid Bershidsky

June 12, 2015, 9:41 AM CDT
800x-1.jpg

It's easy to see why Representative John Conyers, a Michigan Democrat, would have a problem with the military unit commanded by Ukrainian legislator Andriy Biletsky: Conyers is a founding member of the Congressional Black Caucus, Biletsky is a white supremacist.

Ukraine's Neo-Nazis Won't Get U.S. Money
 
Camp you are deluding yourself that they aren't nazis.

Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi brigade fighting pro-Russian separatists
Kiev throws paramilitaries – some openly neo-Nazi - into the front of the battle with rebels

ukraine-neo-nazi-5_3002183b.jpg


Phantom, 23, a fighter in the Azov battalion, outside its HQ in the Ukrainian seaside town of Urzuf Photo: Tom Parfitt

From this article:

But Kiev’s use of volunteer paramilitaries to stamp out the Russian-backed Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics”, proclaimed in eastern Ukraine in March, should send a shiver down Europe’s spine. Recently formed battalions such as Donbas, Dnipro and Azov, with several thousand men under their command, are officially under the control of the interior ministry but their financing is murky, their training inadequate and their ideology often alarming.

The Azov men use the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel (Wolf’s Hook) symbol on their banner and members of the battalion are openly white supremacists, or anti-Semites.

Personally, I’m a Nazi,” said “Phantom”, a 23-year-old former lawyer at the ceremony wearing camouflage and holding a Kalashnikov. “I don’t hate any other nationalities but I believe each nation should have its own country.” He added: “We have one idea: to liberate our land from terrorists.”

ukraine_3002177c.jpg


Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi brigade fighting pro-Russian separatists
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Denying the legitimacy of elections is becoming a staple of the left.

Crimea belongs to the people of Crimea. They voted to return to Russia. This can't be that hard to understand.
 
Crimea was autonomous within the Ukraine but of course after the coup they voted to return to Mother Russia for protection from Kiev.
hello Mars (Olgino troll) , new back to the international law : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262
"
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 was adopted on March 27, 2014 by the sixty-eighth session of the United Nations General Assembly in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea and entitled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine"....

the General Assembly's commitment to the territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and underscored the invalidity of the 2014 Crimean referendum.

The resolution was introduced by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine.[1] The adoption of the resolution was preceded by the unsuccessful attempts of the United Nations Security Council, which convened seven sessions to address the Crimean crisis, only to face a Russian veto...."

So fucking what? The Crimeans wanted to return to being a Russian territory. Their choice. Fuck the UN and all the western nations that backed the coup.
Denying the legitimacy of elections is becoming a staple of the left.

Crimea belongs to the people of Crimea. They voted to return to Russia. This can't be that hard to understand.
No , Crimea much (like Florida ) part of Ukraine . and UN 68/262 resolution is very clear on this . you can post 10000000 posts with your Kremlin narrative, it will not change the INTERNATIONAL AND UKRAINIAN LAWS
 
....

Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi .
ukraine-neo-nazi-5_3002183b.jpg


Phantom, 23, a fighter in the Azov battalion, outside its HQ in the Ukrainian seaside town of Urzuf Photo: Tom Parfitt

From this article:

But Kiev’s use of volunteer paramilitaries to stamp out the Russian-backed Donetsk and Luhansk “people’s republics”, proclaimed in eastern Ukraine in March, should send a shiver down Europe’s spine. Recently formed battalions such as Donbas, Dnipro and Azov, with several thousand men under their command, are officially under the control of the interior ministry but their financing is murky, their training inadequate and their ideology often alarming.

The Azov men use the neo-Nazi Wolfsangel (Wolf’s Hook) symbol on their banner and members of the battalion are openly white supremacists, or anti-Semites.

Personally, I’m a Nazi,” said “Phantom”, a 23-year-old former lawyer at the ceremony wearing camouflage and holding a Kalashnikov. “I don’t hate any other nationalities but I believe each nation should have its own country.” He added: “We have one idea: to liberate our land from terrorists.”

ukraine_3002177c.jpg


Ukraine crisis: the neo-Nazi brigade fighting pro-Russian separatists


HEAVY GUNS FROM A PAID TROLL , HERE WE GO

THE BIGGEST IN THE WORLD FASCIST PARTY - LDPR

Liberal Democratic Party of Russia - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../Liberal_Democratic_Party_of_Russi...

The LDPR (Russian: ЛДПР), formerly the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia is a far-right political party. The controversial Vladimir Zhirinovsky has led the party ...


Muscovite Nazis kill people on the streets







images

images


upload_2017-10-13_14-7-24.jpeg


upload_2017-10-13_14-7-14.jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top