No, the FBI did not say it would ‘reopen’ its investigation.

[AntonToo]

Vast right-wing conspiracy or Russian meddling in Presidential politics, which is it.

Are those mutually exclusive?

 

[BlindBoo]

Comey said she had committed crimes but they were choosing to not recommend an indictment

Where did he say that?

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

Right here dear silly person. I highlighted the section that pertains to the criminal aspect of her actions. See that word OBLIGATED? Yes, that one right there. That's what they busted that USMC General for doing. Not protecting the subject matter.





"For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities

..........

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

He never once said she committed any crime.

 

[westwall]

Comey said she had committed crimes but they were choosing to not recommend an indictment

Where did he say that?

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

Right here dear silly person. I highlighted the section that pertains to the criminal aspect of her actions. See that word OBLIGATED? Yes, that one right there. That's what they busted that USMC General for doing. Not protecting the subject matter.





"For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it."

Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities

..........

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

He never once said she committed any crime.

Yes, he did. It's that word OBLIGATED. She didn't do that which she was obligated to do. That makes it a crime. He parsed his words very carefully as lawyers do. But if you are obligated, and you didn't, you did something wrong. Simple English.

 

[Rustic]

The live links contained in the OP are quite compelling that this whole story is bogus.

Says the suck ass, kiss ass Washington Redskin

 

[rdean]

The case can't be reopened. It was never actually closed.

 

[Lakhota]

I think NaziCons are in for another rude awakening.

 

[rdean]

and the Director himself notes they may not even be significant

Emails related to Clinton case were found during investigation of Anthony Weiner

 

[Lakhota]

REPORTS: New Emails Under Review Not From Hillary, And Not From Her Server...

FROM WEINER SEXTING PROBE!...

Podesta: Vague FBI Note ‘Extraordinary,’ Must Release More Info Immediately...

Feinstein ‘Shocked’: ‘Appalling’ Lack Of Caution Near Election...

Former DOJ Chief: Comey’s ‘Worst Abuse Yet’...

Trump Gloats...

News Outlets Report GOP Mischaracterization, Then Dial Back...

Comey had better quickly get his shit together.

 

[Rustic]

REPORTS: New Emails Under Review Not From Hillary, And Not From Her Server...

FROM WEINER SEXTING PROBE!...

Podesta: Vague FBI Note ‘Extraordinary,’ Must Release More Info Immediately...

Feinstein ‘Shocked’: ‘Appalling’ Lack Of Caution Near Election...

Former DOJ Chief: Comey’s ‘Worst Abuse Yet’...

Trump Gloats...

News Outlets Report GOP Mischaracterization, Then Dial Back...

Comey had better quickly get his shit together.

The weiners and clintons are incestuous... no one can tell where one ends and the other begins... lol

 

[louie888]

[QUOTE="Lakhota]
No, the FBI did not say it would ‘reopen’ its investigation.[/QUOTE]
Yes they did. This thread is a total fa il.

 

[Lakhota]

[QUOTE="Lakhota]
No, the FBI did not say it would ‘reopen’ its investigation.

Yes they did. This thread is a total fa il.[/QUOTE]

Really? Where's your "credible" proof?

 

[Lakhota]

James Comey: Asshole of the day.

 

[Dot Com]

Poor, poor LW Establishment Drones

Sent from my azpen using Tapatalk

 

[Norman]

Do these guys do anything but deflect all day long?

Keep living in your alternate reality.

Comey has performed a heroic deed today. I can see why criminals would oppose, as they always oppose justice.