No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

[LaDexter]

I just have faith in our intelligence agencies

Then there is something seriously SERIOUSLY WRONG with you...

 

[toomuchtime_]

There are a few honest Democrats in Congress who have acknowledged there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, but only a few. Like Brennan, you dance around rather than answer questions honestly. Brennan tries to justify the political witch hunt he ran by saying some people associated with the Trump campaign had had some conversations with Russians and in the past Russians had tried to recruit Americans to act on their behalf, therefore he suspected. . . what? That any American who talked to a Russian was a potential spy? How bizarre is it that Obama's CIA director makes the charges leveled at the Salem witch trials sound relatively sane and responsible?

You grossly simplify the situation. It isn't that people spoke to some Russians. It's the combo of a country actively interfering in the election, talking to trump people, and then trump people lying and covering up the meetings. How can they not look into it? If they didn't it would be extremely wreckless

lol You just can't put up a post without telling another lie, can you? There is no direct evidence the Russians "interfered" with the election, and none of the people investigated lied to the FBI about these meetings. On the contrary, the evidence is that the Obama administration interfered with the election and misused the CIA and FBI to this end.

What did I lie about in my last statement? You say there is no evidence that Russia interfered? Are you on crack? Post one quote/statement of ANYBODY besides Trump, who has access to the classified intelligence, who denies that Russian interference. ANYBODY.

You need to disabuse yourself of the notion you are being clever; you're just corrupt and dishonest. I say there is no evidence and you respond that people believe it happened, not that there is evidence. You use the word, interfere, instead of stating what you allege they did because there in no evidence the Russian government did anything illegal. What this all comes down to is that Obama's CIA director targeted the Trump campaign with false allegations for political reasons.

I just have faith in our intelligence agencies. Plus there is the FACT that you and I do not have access to classified intel so we can only trust our elected representatives and our institutions. You can't name ONE person who has access to intel that denies Russian interference in our election. That should tell you something. How you don't get it is pretty baffling.

Try again... Name ONE person... Quote him/her

Again, you just can't put up a post without telling another lie. What do you mean by interference? It means you have no idea what the Russians are alleged to have done. You use the term, interference, to promote the rumors and to avoid dealing with the facts.

 

[radical right]

Again, you just can't put up a post without telling another lie. What do you mean by interference? It means you have no idea what the Russians are alleged to have done. You use the term, interference, to promote the rumors and to avoid dealing with the facts.

We have intercepts of the Russians planning to interfere with the American election. Doing what they could to throw it into turmoil, and undermine Americas confidence in their election system. That's a FACT.
We need to investigate exactly what the Russians did to try to pull it off. We won't know the details of what the Russians did, until we finish investigating, and then you'll have a full list of specifics.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Again, you just can't put up a post without telling another lie. What do you mean by interference? It means you have no idea what the Russians are alleged to have done. You use the term, interference, to promote the rumors and to avoid dealing with the facts.

We have intercepts of the Russians planning to interfere with the American election. Doing what they could to throw it into turmoil, and undermine Americas confidence in their election system. That's a FACT.
We need to investigate exactly what the Russians did to try to pull it off. We won't know the details of what the Russians did, until we finish investigating, and then you'll have a full list of specifics.

First off, interfere with the election is a propaganda term that means nothing, and every time some one uses it they are telling you they have no idea what the Russians may or may not have done. Everyone is allowed to interfere in our elections as long as they don't do anything illegal. For example, the British clearly tried to interfere in our election by proposing bills in parliament critical of Trump and by their news media broadcasting critical stories about Trump among other things. In all these months of investigation, neither the FBI nor the CIA has been able to produce any direct evidence the Russian government did anything illegal to influence the election. The evidence is there was never a legitimate basis for opening this investigation in the first place and that from the first this was a political witch hunt aimed at bolstering the Obama Russia hoax.

It is now time to begin investigating the people, such as John Brennan, who perpetrated this fraud on the American people and wasted millions, perhaps tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on nothing but political propaganda.

 

[radical right]

First off, interfere with the election is a propaganda term that means nothing, and every time some one uses it they are telling you they have no idea what the Russians may or may not have done. Everyone is allowed to interfere in our elections as long as they don't do anything illegal. For example, the British clearly tried to interfere in our election by proposing bills in parliament critical of Trump and by their news media broadcasting critical stories about Trump among other things. In all these months of investigation, neither the FBI nor the CIA has been able to produce any direct evidence the Russian government did anything illegal to influence the election. .

Foreigners are not allowed to participate in our elections. They can't donate time or money to political campaigns When you mentioned NEWS, you realize that's a red herring. News can say anything they want, just look at Fox News. Same with foreign laws and actions.

But unlike your claim, out of ignorance you think the classified information the FBI, CIA, NSA etc have against the russians doesn't exist because you don't have access to it. And those that do, can't release it to the public.

 

[toomuchtime_]

First off, interfere with the election is a propaganda term that means nothing, and every time some one uses it they are telling you they have no idea what the Russians may or may not have done. Everyone is allowed to interfere in our elections as long as they don't do anything illegal. For example, the British clearly tried to interfere in our election by proposing bills in parliament critical of Trump and by their news media broadcasting critical stories about Trump among other things. In all these months of investigation, neither the FBI nor the CIA has been able to produce any direct evidence the Russian government did anything illegal to influence the election. .

Foreigners are not allowed to participate in our elections. They can't donate time or money to political campaigns When you mentioned NEWS, you realize that's a red herring. News can say anything they want, just look at Fox News. Same with foreign laws and actions.

But unlike your claim, out of ignorance you think the classified information the FBI, CIA, NSA etc have against the russians doesn't exist because you don't have access to it. And those that do, can't release it to the public.

So what you are saying is that as far as you know there is absolutely no evidence the Russian government did anything illegal with regard to the election, but you choose to believe they did anyway.

 

[ptbw forever]

First off, interfere with the election is a propaganda term that means nothing, and every time some one uses it they are telling you they have no idea what the Russians may or may not have done. Everyone is allowed to interfere in our elections as long as they don't do anything illegal. For example, the British clearly tried to interfere in our election by proposing bills in parliament critical of Trump and by their news media broadcasting critical stories about Trump among other things. In all these months of investigation, neither the FBI nor the CIA has been able to produce any direct evidence the Russian government did anything illegal to influence the election. .

Foreigners are not allowed to participate in our elections. They can't donate time or money to political campaigns When you mentioned NEWS, you realize that's a red herring. News can say anything they want, just look at Fox News. Same with foreign laws and actions.

But unlike your claim, out of ignorance you think the classified information the FBI, CIA, NSA etc have against the russians doesn't exist because you don't have access to it. And those that do, can't release it to the public.

The only thing the Russians have been accused of doing is making fake NEWS sites, dipshit.

 

[oreo]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

/---- And this exchange on CNN:
Jeffrey Toobin was also on CNN. He just heard Mukasey tell Cooper: "You don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s nothing to see here. They just heard Dershowitz say that they’re going about this ass backwards. These people don’t have a violation. They don’t have a crime. They don’t have anything. So they’re just throwing everything up against the wall and hoping one day they’re gonna find a violation of a crime.

TOOBIN: Aiding and abetting hacking is a crime.

DERSHOWITZ: You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

 

[toomuchtime_]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

The fact remains that people with access to classified information from the FBI and CIA continue to say there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. Your "criminal investigation" may find an uncrossed T or an undotted I here or there among some people associated with the Trump campaign but by now we know there was no collusion.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Again, you just can't put up a post without telling another lie. What do you mean by interference? It means you have no idea what the Russians are alleged to have done. You use the term, interference, to promote the rumors and to avoid dealing with the facts.

We have intercepts of the Russians planning to interfere with the American election. Doing what they could to throw it into turmoil, and undermine Americas confidence in their election system. That's a FACT.
We need to investigate exactly what the Russians did to try to pull it off. We won't know the details of what the Russians did, until we finish investigating, and then you'll have a full list of specifics.

/----

 

[oreo]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

I am not making anything up dumbass--you can listen to it yourself. In this FOX News video Shep Smith clearly states that Trump surrogates where not only in continual contact with the Russian Ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that Russia was hacking into DNC databases. (They weren't trading cookie recipes.) What makes it even worse is that the Trump administration denied that any of their people had contact with any Russians during the campaign season. They did that 5 times.

Let's see if you can get through an 8 minute video.



There is absolutely no reason for Trump campaign aids or surrogates to be in this much contact with the Russians during the campaign season. Russians can't vote or make campaign donations.

As of last Thursday--this has turned into a Criminal Investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

 

[Cellblock2429]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

I am not making anything up dumbass--you can listen to it yourself. In this FOX News video Shep Smith clearly states that Trump surrogates where not only in continual contact with the Russian Ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that Russia was hacking into DNC databases. (They weren't trading cookie recipes.) What makes it even worse is that the Trump administration denied that any of their people had contact with any Russians during the campaign season. They did that 5 times.

Let's see if you can get through an 8 minute video.



There is absolutely no reason for Trump campaign aids or surrogates to be in this much contact with the Russians during the campaign season. Russians can't vote or make campaign donations.

As of last Thursday--this has turned into a Criminal Investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

/--- Fox News lies according to Libtards. BWHAHAHAHAAHAHA You still got nothing.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

I am not making anything up dumbass--you can listen to it yourself. In this FOX News video Shep Smith clearly states that Trump surrogates where not only in continual contact with the Russian Ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that Russia was hacking into DNC databases. (They weren't trading cookie recipes.) What makes it even worse is that the Trump administration denied that any of their people had contact with any Russians during the campaign season. They did that 5 times.

Let's see if you can get through an 8 minute video.



There is absolutely no reason for Trump campaign aids or surrogates to be in this much contact with the Russians during the campaign season. Russians can't vote or make campaign donations.

As of last Thursday--this has turned into a Criminal Investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

Your point must be that Shepard Smith says some pretty stupid things, since we know from Democrats like Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin and Maxine Waters, all of whom have access to classified material and have been briefed by both the CIA and FBI, that there is no evidence of collusion.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

I am not making anything up dumbass--you can listen to it yourself. In this FOX News video Shep Smith clearly states that Trump surrogates where not only in continual contact with the Russian Ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that Russia was hacking into DNC databases. (They weren't trading cookie recipes.) What makes it even worse is that the Trump administration denied that any of their people had contact with any Russians during the campaign season. They did that 5 times.

Let's see if you can get through an 8 minute video.



There is absolutely no reason for Trump campaign aids or surrogates to be in this much contact with the Russians during the campaign season. Russians can't vote or make campaign donations.

As of last Thursday--this has turned into a Criminal Investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

Your point must be that Shepard Smith says some pretty stupid things, since we know from Democrats like Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin and Maxine Waters, all of whom have access to classified material and have been briefed by both the CIA and FBI, that there is no evidence of collusion.

/----Last night, CNN, Anderson Cooper 95. He’s talking with the former attorney general, Michael Mukasey, about reports that Kushner has become a focus in the Russia election. Anderson Cooper says in his question, “Jared Kushner is not a suspect here. He is not a person of interest. He is just, we’re told, a focus. They want to speak to him because it seems like he was basically a witness. What do you make of this, Attorney General Mukasey?”

MUKASEY: If you read back what you just said, you used two terms that are unknown to any federal investigator. “Person of interest” is not a term that any federal investigator ever uses, and it’s not a term that’s appropriate to this investigation. This is a national security investigation. It’s not a criminal investigation. So pretty much everybody is a witness. Now, what are they a witness to? They’re probably a witness to the fact that the Russians were trying to get close to influence people of influence. That’s what they do. That is not in itself surprising.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

This Russian investigation turned into a CRIMINAL investigation last Thursday--May 18, 2017.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it's clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe. “The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber. He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations. “You've got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access"
to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

They don't turn what was a congressional probe into a criminal investigation without some strong evidence of wrong-doing.

Now--if this article is suggesting that Trump "personally" was not in contact with any Russians--so-be-it. But Nixon didn't personally break into a DNC office either. No one is going to believe that all these surrogates of Trump were in contact with the Russians throughout the campaign season and were just trading cookie recipes and--yet that Trump didn't know about it--or approved of it. So he goes down either way.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia







If Republicans can do 8 investigations into Benghazi, it's not too hard to imagine what Democrats will do with Treason, Obstruction and Lies when they take over in 2018.

/---- ALAN DERSHOWITZ responds: "You have to show evidence. You’re just making that up. You have to show evidence not only that they knew about the hacking, but they worked hand-in-glove with them. You’re just making it up."

I am not making anything up dumbass--you can listen to it yourself. In this FOX News video Shep Smith clearly states that Trump surrogates where not only in continual contact with the Russian Ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that Russia was hacking into DNC databases. (They weren't trading cookie recipes.) What makes it even worse is that the Trump administration denied that any of their people had contact with any Russians during the campaign season. They did that 5 times.

Let's see if you can get through an 8 minute video.



There is absolutely no reason for Trump campaign aids or surrogates to be in this much contact with the Russians during the campaign season. Russians can't vote or make campaign donations.

As of last Thursday--this has turned into a Criminal Investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

Your point must be that Shepard Smith says some pretty stupid things, since we know from Democrats like Diane Feinstein, Joe Manchin and Maxine Waters, all of whom have access to classified material and have been briefed by both the CIA and FBI, that there is no evidence of collusion.

/----Last night, CNN, Anderson Cooper 95. He’s talking with the former attorney general, Michael Mukasey, about reports that Kushner has become a focus in the Russia election. Anderson Cooper says in his question, “Jared Kushner is not a suspect here. He is not a person of interest. He is just, we’re told, a focus. They want to speak to him because it seems like he was basically a witness. What do you make of this, Attorney General Mukasey?”

MUKASEY: If you read back what you just said, you used two terms that are unknown to any federal investigator. “Person of interest” is not a term that any federal investigator ever uses, and it’s not a term that’s appropriate to this investigation. This is a national security investigation. It’s not a criminal investigation. So pretty much everybody is a witness. Now, what are they a witness to? They’re probably a witness to the fact that the Russians were trying to get close to influence people of influence. That’s what they do. That is not in itself surprising.

And we might add, not only the Russians but every country that has an interest in US policy tries to get close to people with influence with the President.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[Slade3200]

I just have faith in our intelligence agencies

Then there is something seriously SERIOUSLY WRONG with you...

Says the peanut gallery. Go get your hands dirty and serve your country or shut the fuck up about things you know nothing about.

 

[Slade3200]

You grossly simplify the situation. It isn't that people spoke to some Russians. It's the combo of a country actively interfering in the election, talking to trump people, and then trump people lying and covering up the meetings. How can they not look into it? If they didn't it would be extremely wreckless

lol You just can't put up a post without telling another lie, can you? There is no direct evidence the Russians "interfered" with the election, and none of the people investigated lied to the FBI about these meetings. On the contrary, the evidence is that the Obama administration interfered with the election and misused the CIA and FBI to this end.

What did I lie about in my last statement? You say there is no evidence that Russia interfered? Are you on crack? Post one quote/statement of ANYBODY besides Trump, who has access to the classified intelligence, who denies that Russian interference. ANYBODY.

You need to disabuse yourself of the notion you are being clever; you're just corrupt and dishonest. I say there is no evidence and you respond that people believe it happened, not that there is evidence. You use the word, interfere, instead of stating what you allege they did because there in no evidence the Russian government did anything illegal. What this all comes down to is that Obama's CIA director targeted the Trump campaign with false allegations for political reasons.

I just have faith in our intelligence agencies. Plus there is the FACT that you and I do not have access to classified intel so we can only trust our elected representatives and our institutions. You can't name ONE person who has access to intel that denies Russian interference in our election. That should tell you something. How you don't get it is pretty baffling.

Try again... Name ONE person... Quote him/her

Again, you just can't put up a post without telling another lie. What do you mean by interference? It means you have no idea what the Russians are alleged to have done. You use the term, interference, to promote the rumors and to avoid dealing with the facts.

That twice you've failed to answer a simple question. Wanna go for strike three?