No cases of voter protection of blacks for years under Bush

[Truthmatters]

they were FAKE cases you fool.

Do I need to teach you about the DOJ scandal under Bush?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

God, I'm so glad this one is back....

 

[Truthmatters]

Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy was initiated by the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys on December 7, 2006, by the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]

The dismissed U.S. Attorneys had all been appointed by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the Senate, more than four years earlier.[9][10] Two other attorneys were dismissed in controversial circumstances in 2005–2006. Twenty-six or more U.S. Attorneys had been under consideration for dismissal during this time period.[11][12][13] The firings received attention via hearings in Congress in January 2007, and by March 2007 the controversy had national visibility. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales stated that the U.S. Attorneys "serve at the pleasure of the president" and described the affair as "an overblown personnel matter".[14][15]

By mid-September 2007, nine of the highest-level officers of the Department of Justice associated with the controversy had resigned,[16][17][18][19] most prominently, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.[20][21][22][23]

 

[bripat9643]

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations

They asked election officials to produce cases of voter fraud? How is an election official going to know a voter wasn't eligible to vote or that he wasn't who he claimed to be if he isn't required to present proper ID?

Bush did a five year study and found non also idiot

Election officials have no way of knowing whether a potential voter is legally registered, and he has no way of knowing whether the person who appears at the polls is actually who he claims to be if he isn't required to present ID. There's no way you can determine after the fact that any given voter cast a fraudulent ballot.

Any claims about the non-existence of voter fraud are pure horseshit. All they can do is statistical studies, and those show that voter fraud is rampant.

 

[Tank]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuHXF0016qE]Voting Twice - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Truthmatters]

The Bush right wing church school DOJ was OUT OF CONTROL.


that was proven you fucking idiot

 

[Truthmatters]

go get any study that proves this type of fraud effects elections.

only right wing lies claim that

There is NO facts to back that lie

 

[bripat9643]

go get any study that proves this type of fraud effects elections.

only right wing lies claim that

There is NO facts to back that lie

The only evidence turds like you will accept is the kind that is impossible to produce.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[blastoff]

Hey, Truthy, can't you get your sidekick LilOlLady to come back too. Twice the laughs would be lots of fun for many of us.

 

[hunarcy]

they were FAKE cases you fool.

Do I need to teach you about the DOJ scandal under Bush?

I have no interest in your partisan spin on the firings. The FACT is that the cases were never proven to have been "faked" and for anyone to not investigate based on partisan leanings should be cause for dismissal. It is undeniable that if the prosecutions didn't take place simply because Democrats or voters likely to vote for Democrats were involved, (and that is the quote from YOUR post) that's a reason to be terminated. Cry and stamp your feet and call whatever name you want, but that changes NOTHING.

 

[Truthmatters]

So you REALLY never heard of the DOJ scandal in this country?


how fucking old are you 16

 

[jknowgood]

because they do

Wow, thanks for the laugh. Tdm, let me help you with this , if your to stupid to get to the polling place to vote. Maybe you shouldn't vote. Not my fault liberals are too stupid to vote, your proof of that.

 

[Truthmatters]

go get any study that proves this type of fraud effects elections.

only right wing lies claim that

There is NO facts to back that lie

The only evidence turds like you will accept is the kind that is impossible to produce.

Dude I gave you facts



You offered no FACTS.

I will not accept what you cant produce in the line of facts.


your fucking dumb as a box of round rocks

 

[hunarcy]

So you REALLY never heard of the DOJ scandal in this country?


how fucking old are you 16

LOL! So, you want to change the subject? Here's a hankie, go sniffle in the corner.

 

[Truthmatters]

because they do

Wow, thanks for the laugh. Tdm, let me help you with this , if your to stupid to get to the polling place to vote. Maybe you shouldn't vote. Not my fault liberals are too stupid to vote, your proof of that.

what the hell are you rambling on about nutter?

 

[Truthmatters]

So you REALLY never heard of the DOJ scandal in this country?


how fucking old are you 16

LOL! So, you want to change the subject? Here's a hankie, go sniffle in the corner.

How is giving you facts about what YOU claimed changing the subject you fucking asshole?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Hey, Truthy, can't you get your sidekick LilOlLady to come back too. Twice the laughs would be lots of fun for many of us.

Screw that. TM was not missed.

 

[Truthmatters]

Joseph D. Rich | Playing politics with Justice - Los Angeles Times


It has notably shirked its legal responsibility to protect voting rights. From 2001 to 2006, no voting discrimination cases were brought on behalf of African American or Native American voters. U.S. attorneys were told instead to give priority to voter fraud cases, which, when coupled with the strong support for voter ID laws, indicated an intent to depress voter turnout in minority and poor communities.

At least two of the recently fired U.S. attorneys, John McKay in Seattle and David C. Iglesias in New Mexico, were targeted largely because they refused to prosecute voting fraud cases that implicated Democrats or voters likely to vote for Democrats.

read the facts asshole

 

[Truthmatters]

The DOJ scandal was part of this you fool.

they are who cheated to keep people from voting