rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 289,008
- 170,814
- 2,615
Newt,..............the gift that keeps on giving
It has only just begun
It has only just begun
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Newt,..............the gift that keeps on giving
It has only just begun
Chickenhawk Newt = Chickenhawk Obama.
Same same
Newt,..............the gift that keeps on giving
It has only just begun
Can't you ever say anything that enhances a debate?
Your ignorance on mormonism knows no bounds does it?
Mitt has no control over who goes to heaven. Newt (if president) might have some control over women in combat.You are working on the assumption that there are women who just can't wait to get into combat...
I find it amusing that given how Mormons think women can only get into heaven if bonded to a Mormon man are suddenly becoming rabid feminist right advocates. It's hilarious.
Your arguments are illogical.
I'm sorry, again, is there some big faction that say, "Man, I can't wait for chicks to come back in Body Bags."
Of course not. Fact is, women still can't serve in the combat arms branches in the army. A lot of them died in the Iraq War, because they were truck drivers and supply clerks and other soft targets for the insurgents to hit...
I was pointing out that Mr. Romney belongs to a whacky cult that sees women as second class citizens, and now he's going to argue that Gingrich (gasp) supports what the military's policy already is. Really?
But I understand the desperation of RINO's and Liberals, who really wanted Mittens for Christmas.
Women have as much right to be in combat as men. It's just that simple. Newt would treat women as second class citizens.
I wasn't aware that there was a "right" to be in combat. I thought it was about the needs of the military in order to win the war.
There are a whole lot of reasons people aren't allowed in the military. The military already limits the roles of females. And to keep the ones they have, they have to make a whole bunch of special accommedations (compare the APFT for women to the one for men. They don't need to do as many pushups or run as fast.)
The problem with liberals is that they see the military as just another benefits program.
And you see a woman as a none equal... Please, run off it... PLEASE.
I like the part where Newt says a women would be better than a man at sitting in a chair, because men want to run around... Oh and that was his reason for it, he didnt say it's because a man would do a worse job than a women due to a womans superior mind (or some shit), no, it was because a woman can sit in a chair better than a man.
You're the ultimate über-RINO, and you sure seem desperate.
When we hear Romney saying those things, we'll assume that is what he believes. Until then, its just desperate conjecture on your part.
There is a right to equal application of the laws, including those which govern combat. To pre-empt that right the state must demonstrate a compelling governmental interest as to why, and provide factual, objective evidence in support.I wasn't aware that there was a "right" to be in combat. I thought it was about the needs of the military in order to win the war.
It is a right in that women should be given the opportunity to try.It's not a matter of right. Is that can they handle it? Would you want to count on a woman to carry you out of combat when you are wounded? Let's use some common sense. Men and women's anatomy are different. A small perecentage of women could handle it, but the majority could not.
Let's make stringent of requirements the same for men and women. Can a women carry a man any distance if they are 200 lbs? I wouldn't want to be in combat next to a 98 lb. man either, but let's make the requirements of aptitude be the deciding factor, not the sex.
Newt,..............the gift that keeps on giving
It has only just begun
Can't you ever say anything that enhances a debate?
Newt Gingrich...
Defending women against crotch rot
Well I was a medic in an infantry unit. We had no women in our company. We lived in the city and went without showering for roughly 21 day intervals unless it was with bottle water. Baby wipes were a staple. Those who came before me in the initial entry into Iraq, as far as I know, went nearly 3 months without showering. The reasoning behind this is that women would suffer infection, such as yeast infection because of their anatomy. Yes women are actually different than men believe it or not. They also suffer form wider hips which lead to stress fracture when carrying weight or rucking long distances. Another causality of biology I'm afraid. Enough of this bullshit that women and men are the same. It's just complete bat shit crazy to think that. Women provide so much that men can't provide why do some people think they need to provide the things that they just can't provide as well?
There is a right to equal application of the laws, including those which govern combat. To pre-empt that right the state must demonstrate a compelling governmental interest as to why, and provide factual, objective evidence in support.I wasn't aware that there was a "right" to be in combat. I thought it was about the needs of the military in order to win the war.
There is no evidence that women cant exist in a trench or other harsh conditions for an extended period of time compared to men; indeed, women and men lived in similar harsh conditions for millennia prior to the advent of civilization and tragically millions of women live in such conditions today.
Gingrichs comments are idiotic accordingly, and there continues to be no indication of his brilliance.
It is a right in that women should be given the opportunity to try.It's not a matter of right. Is that can they handle it? Would you want to count on a woman to carry you out of combat when you are wounded? Let's use some common sense. Men and women's anatomy are different. A small perecentage of women could handle it, but the majority could not.
Let's make stringent of requirements the same for men and women. Can a women carry a man any distance if they are 200 lbs? I wouldn't want to be in combat next to a 98 lb. man either, but let's make the requirements of aptitude be the deciding factor, not the sex.
The above is an example of a compelling governmental interest to disallow either a woman or a man from combat, as long as its objectively determined and applied equally.
Newt is carrying a lot baggage into the election and we are just starting to open it up.
She isnt young enough or pretty enough to be the Presidents wife.
~Newt Gingrich, talking about his first wife after divorcing her.