Newest Republican Senator votes with Dems.

GOP's Brown branded turncoat for jobs bill vote | Top AP Washington Stories | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

Now shut the fuck up!! There is your link!! Happy now!!

And no.. CNN is not Bias.. It is right in the middle where all new should be..

Christ why do liberals have to do everything for you morons..

If it was on msnbc and CNN.. You can be certian it is accurate.. Feel free to show me an example where they are not.. I can show you page after page of how Faux Noise is not..

Hypocrit?? Whatever.. At least I know how to use the internet..

You're not just a hypocrite, you are an idiot that can't spell and believes anything you hear from sources that are a biased joke like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, the Houston Chronicle....... shut the fuck up dumb ass, you lower the IQ of the entire board every time you speak..

Wow.. I produce a link and you won't even read it.. And you are concerned about my IQ?? Don't worry honey!! My IQ is well above yours..

As for my spelling? Well?? You know what they say.. Anyone who complains about someone's spelling either

A: Got bitched slapped and doesn't have an intelligent response..

or

B: doesn't have an intelligent response to begin with cause they were bitch slapped with the facts..

So which is it for you??

And yes they are the same.. :eusa_whistle:

Why do you leave out the part where you refer to CNN and MSNBC as not biased and that FOx IS biased....despite the fact that the independent and non partisan Pew Research center provided statistical proof of the exact opposite?

When you add in that part of your post, it makes your post laughable and not one of integrity and by no means one that is valid.
 
GOP's Brown branded turncoat for jobs bill vote | Top AP Washington Stories | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

Now shut the fuck up!! There is your link!! Happy now!!

And no.. CNN is not Bias.. It is right in the middle where all new should be..

Christ why do liberals have to do everything for you morons..

If it was on msnbc and CNN.. You can be certian it is accurate.. Feel free to show me an example where they are not.. I can show you page after page of how Faux Noise is not..

Hypocrit?? Whatever.. At least I know how to use the internet..

You're not just a hypocrite, you are an idiot that can't spell and believes anything you hear from sources that are a biased joke like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, the Houston Chronicle....... shut the fuck up dumb ass, you lower the IQ of the entire board every time you speak..

Wow.. I produce a link and you won't even read it.. And you are concerned about my IQ?? Don't worry honey!! My IQ is well above yours..
As for my spelling? Well?? You know what they say.. Anyone who complains about someone's spelling either

A: Got bitched slapped and doesn't have an intelligent response..

or

B: doesn't have an intelligent response to begin with cause they were bitch slapped with the facts..

So which is it for you??

And yes they are the same.. :eusa_whistle:

Yeah, but Sitarro is at least a level 94 Master Warlock and has 490 Alchemy and 520 Herbalism....

Sure your Dodge is at 27%, but you liberals are really good at that, so...
 
I fail to see why this is some kind of shock to anyone. He said he would vote independently and represent those who elected him. That is what he has done. He has not, to my knowledge ever claimed to be anything other than what he is.... independent.

It is kind of typical of the left to see anyone who isn't a left wing nutjob as a conservative though. If liberals could learn to think instead of spouting shit, they might learn that independent does not mean conservative and conservative does not mean GOP.

The shock CAgirl is how warmly or lack their of the republican party has welcomed him into the Senate.. Hate mail, death threats, and other mean texts have all been recieved by Senator Brown from other republicans.. Do you approve of that?

Seems to me the Senator you all bragged abour is actually a democrat with an R next to his name.. I mean.. Other than the dems.. Who else is hated by the republicans so much? And why do you people hate anyways??

That is my issue with you?? 90% of your posts start out with an insult to the person you are resonding to.. Why? Do you need to put someone down to make yourself feel better??

You negged me cause in your words I got personal?? Did I? I was making a point about a law that dealt with sexual preference.. Either you missed the point.. Or simply didn't like it turned against you.. In either case it was not personal and it was a valid point which still stands and has not been responded to by you..

Frankly your posts suck.. They are short and insulting.. They really don't require any intelligent thought to write, and half the time you are wrong anyways..

Case in point.. Not a word about the hate mail.. Do you approve of the way that republicans treat those that disagree with them?? You negged me?? Why? I am entitled to free speech and to disagree with you.. But, you righties love to neg people for simply disagreeing with them.. Is it your policy to go against the constitution and deny people their right to free speech by negging someone? I thought you people were all for the constitution??

I am guess you will neg me again.. No worries.. I am expecting it.. It is a brainless response to neg someone when you disagree with them.. Far be it for you to actually write a post in support of your views..

Just so we are absolutely clear, and because you seem incapable of recognizing the difference between appropriate and inappropriate.... You got negged for this:

That is like askiing CAGirl if she likes it in the ass or prefers to be eaten out..

That is a direct quote from you in a thread about discrimination. That is what you got a neg for, idiot boy. That is not disagreeing with me, that is personal and just plain stupid. Your words, you live with them. It is the remark of a child, not a grown up.... and that does not refer to age, but mentality. You act like a kid, I treat you like one and I call you kid.

What is actually funny, is that I am totally against discrimination - we just have different views on the best way to solve the problem. It is not my fault that you, and a couple of other mentally challenged individuals, are incapable of understanding that.
 
Bipartisan jobs bill clears GOP filibuster - Capitol Hill- msnbc.com

Something tells me this is going to be normal with this guy.. I am sure he wants to be elected more than once.. I saw this on Chris Mathews tonight.. They also talked about all the hate mail this guy was now getting from the right and the republican party..

Uh oh.. Someone in the rebuttlican party has brains and they hate it..

Boss Limpnoodles is going to be pissed!!

Way to go Senator Brown from Mass. Hats off to you man.. Way to vote your conscience.. We need more conservatives like you...

:clap2:

Gee ... that's never happened before.:cuckoo:
 
I fail to see why this is some kind of shock to anyone. He said he would vote independently and represent those who elected him. That is what he has done. He has not, to my knowledge ever claimed to be anything other than what he is.... independent.

It is kind of typical of the left to see anyone who isn't a left wing nutjob as a conservative though. If liberals could learn to think instead of spouting shit, they might learn that independent does not mean conservative and conservative does not mean GOP.

The shock CAgirl is how warmly or lack their of the republican party has welcomed him into the Senate.. Hate mail, death threats, and other mean texts have all been recieved by Senator Brown from other republicans.. Do you approve of that?

Seems to me the Senator you all bragged abour is actually a democrat with an R next to his name.. I mean.. Other than the dems.. Who else is hated by the republicans so much? And why do you people hate anyways??

That is my issue with you?? 90% of your posts start out with an insult to the person you are resonding to.. Why? Do you need to put someone down to make yourself feel better??

You negged me cause in your words I got personal?? Did I? I was making a point about a law that dealt with sexual preference.. Either you missed the point.. Or simply didn't like it turned against you.. In either case it was not personal and it was a valid point which still stands and has not been responded to by you..

Frankly your posts suck.. They are short and insulting.. They really don't require any intelligent thought to write, and half the time you are wrong anyways..

Case in point.. Not a word about the hate mail.. Do you approve of the way that republicans treat those that disagree with them?? You negged me?? Why? I am entitled to free speech and to disagree with you.. But, you righties love to neg people for simply disagreeing with them.. Is it your policy to go against the constitution and deny people their right to free speech by negging someone? I thought you people were all for the constitution??

I am guess you will neg me again.. No worries.. I am expecting it.. It is a brainless response to neg someone when you disagree with them.. Far be it for you to actually write a post in support of your views..

Just so we are absolutely clear, and because you seem incapable of recognizing the difference between appropriate and inappropriate.... You got negged for this:

That is like askiing CAGirl if she likes it in the ass or prefers to be eaten out..

That is a direct quote from you in a thread about discrimination. That is what you got a neg for, idiot boy. That is not disagreeing with me, that is personal and just plain stupid. Your words, you live with them. It is the remark of a child, not a grown up.... and that does not refer to age, but mentality. You act like a kid, I treat you like one and I call you kid.

What is actually funny, is that I am totally against discrimination - we just have different views on the best way to solve the problem. It is not my fault that you, and a couple of other mentally challenged individuals, are incapable of understanding that.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to California Girl again.

well said.
 
And I said elsewhere that Brown would on occassion vote with the Dems. Well, five GOP voted with the Dems on the bill. That's a start at bi-partisanship.
 
And I said elsewhere that Brown would on occassion vote with the Dems. Well, five GOP voted with the Dems on the bill. That's a start at bi-partisanship.

A brain dead moron on life support would have drawn that conclusion.








Oh wait.... yea, he did.
 
You are describing yourself again, CaliforniaGirl. It's called projection. Move along.
 
I fail to see why this is some kind of shock to anyone. He said he would vote independently and represent those who elected him. That is what he has done. He has not, to my knowledge ever claimed to be anything other than what he is.... independent.

It is kind of typical of the left to see anyone who isn't a left wing nutjob as a conservative though. If liberals could learn to think instead of spouting shit, they might learn that independent does not mean conservative and conservative does not mean GOP.

The shock CAgirl is how warmly or lack their of the republican party has welcomed him into the Senate.. Hate mail, death threats, and other mean texts have all been recieved by Senator Brown from other republicans.. Do you approve of that?

Seems to me the Senator you all bragged abour is actually a democrat with an R next to his name.. I mean.. Other than the dems.. Who else is hated by the republicans so much? And why do you people hate anyways??

That is my issue with you?? 90% of your posts start out with an insult to the person you are resonding to.. Why? Do you need to put someone down to make yourself feel better??

You negged me cause in your words I got personal?? Did I? I was making a point about a law that dealt with sexual preference.. Either you missed the point.. Or simply didn't like it turned against you.. In either case it was not personal and it was a valid point which still stands and has not been responded to by you..

Frankly your posts suck.. They are short and insulting.. They really don't require any intelligent thought to write, and half the time you are wrong anyways..

Case in point.. Not a word about the hate mail.. Do you approve of the way that republicans treat those that disagree with them?? You negged me?? Why? I am entitled to free speech and to disagree with you.. But, you righties love to neg people for simply disagreeing with them.. Is it your policy to go against the constitution and deny people their right to free speech by negging someone? I thought you people were all for the constitution??

I am guess you will neg me again.. No worries.. I am expecting it.. It is a brainless response to neg someone when you disagree with them.. Far be it for you to actually write a post in support of your views..

Just so we are absolutely clear, and because you seem incapable of recognizing the difference between appropriate and inappropriate.... You got negged for this:

That is like askiing CAGirl if she likes it in the ass or prefers to be eaten out..

That is a direct quote from you in a thread about discrimination. That is what you got a neg for, idiot boy. That is not disagreeing with me, that is personal and just plain stupid. Your words, you live with them. It is the remark of a child, not a grown up.... and that does not refer to age, but mentality. You act like a kid, I treat you like one and I call you kid.

What is actually funny, is that I am totally against discrimination - we just have different views on the best way to solve the problem. It is not my fault that you, and a couple of other mentally challenged individuals, are incapable of understanding that.

It is like what I said to someone on here yesterday.
Dr. House was in a debate with someone...and after Dr. House made a popint, the response was an attack on Houses intelligence and credibility...so of course, House responded in kind as he had already won the debate...and then house was criticized for responding the way he did.

SO I tired to explain that, in a debate, when the opposition responds to your point with an attack on your character and/or credibility, it is a sign of surrender.

Of course, the person I tried to explain that to, refused to see the point I was making.
 
This morning on Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough said this bill was like 15 billion in tax cuts for small business. Something he thought every Republican would be wildly ecstatic for. Guess not.

We have been saying for months the obstructionist Republican Party puts "Party" over the good of the country and we've pointed out how partisan they are, which for some reason, they continue to deny. Call a turd a turd. If it's a turd, then it is what it is.

How are Republicans going to spin this so they can say, "It's Obama who is partisan"? Some how, they will get Obama in there and complain it's his fault.

Joe said Democrats should submit a 5 billion dollar tax cut bill every month just to see how long it would take for Republicans to support it. I say, "Never" as long as Republicans want to "bring down" this president.
 
This morning on Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough said this bill was like 15 billion in tax cuts for small business. Something he thought every Republican would be wildly ecstatic for. Guess not.

We have been saying for months the obstructionist Republican Party puts "Party" over the good of the country and we've pointed out how partisan they are, which for some reason, they continue to deny. Call a turd a turd. If it's a turd, then it is what it is.

How are Republicans going to spin this so they can say, "It's Obama who is partisan"? Some how, they will get Obama in there and complain it's his fault.

Joe said Democrats should submit a 5 billion dollar tax cut bill every month just to see how long it would take for Republicans to support it. I say, "Never" as long as Republicans want to "bring down" this president.

You realize that there are other things in the bill than tax cuts, right? Where does this ability to not see the whole and just focus on little parts come from? To me, this is the same issue as piggybacking crap onto decent bills. Anyone who votes against is hung out to dry and facts are manipulated for partisan political point scoring. Now, that may be a tactic that you are comfortable with. Personally, I would prefer that our politician were honest with us and that we were honest with each other. You guys must be getting really dizzy with all that spinning.
 
This independent thinkin challenges the very soul of some of the Tea Baggers. You are with us or against us: period. Here is a quote that I think captures the real nature of some of these little dick taters:

[Writes Avlon: "Hunting for heretics pretends to be a principled fight for ideological purity, but behind that mask is an uglier impulse, an attempt to intimidate and insist on conformity . . . a reminder of what the Czech dissident-turned-president Václav Havel once wrote: /QUOTE]

washingtonpost.com

From a conservative writer no less. She will be taken to task by the crazies for denying their world view of reality.
 
There was no republican filibuster organized against this "jobs" bill. Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it. Scott (#41 where it counted) Brown's vote wasn't needed.
 
Last edited:
There was no republican filibuster organized against this "jobs" bill. Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it. Scott (#41 where it counted) Brown's vote wasn't needed.

True. Interestingly, I support the TEA party movement and yet I don't have a problem with Brown voting for the bill. He was voted in by the people of Mass and he should vote for them, not me.

Weird how liberals consistently seem incapable of grasping the rather simple concept of independent thought.
 
Weird how liberals consistently seem incapable of grasping the rather simple concept of independent thought.

AYSM? Maybe it's because right now there isn't an independent thought in the current republican conservative leadership? Please, get a life, your party right now is the party of jsut say yes to what ever kantor, boehner or Mcwaddles say.:cuckoo:

I am truly amazed.
 
There was no republican filibuster organized against this "jobs" bill. Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it. Scott (#41 where it counted) Brown's vote wasn't needed.

What a spineless comment.

There was no filibuster because the five GOP votes made a filibuster impossible.
 
There was no republican filibuster organized against this "jobs" bill. Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it. Scott (#41 where it counted) Brown's vote wasn't needed.

True. Interestingly, I support the TEA party movement and yet I don't have a problem with Brown voting for the bill. He was voted in by the people of Mass and he should vote for them, not me.

Weird how liberals consistently seem incapable of grasping the rather simple concept of independent thought.

Well, you are still good for giggles.
 
Weird how liberals consistently seem incapable of grasping the rather simple concept of independent thought.

AYSM? Maybe it's because right now there isn't an independent thought in the current republican conservative leadership? Please, get a life, your party right now is the party of jsut say yes to what ever kantor, boehner or Mcwaddles say.:cuckoo:

I am truly amazed.

I don't have a party. Well, I don't normally have one.... but I'm planning one in a few weeks. We'll have cake and ice cream and chocolate and shedloads of alcohol. Gonna be great.
 
There was no republican filibuster organized against this "jobs" bill. Democrats only needed 51 votes to pass it. Scott (#41 where it counted) Brown's vote wasn't needed.

True. Interestingly, I support the TEA party movement and yet I don't have a problem with Brown voting for the bill. He was voted in by the people of Mass and he should vote for them, not me.

Weird how liberals consistently seem incapable of grasping the rather simple concept of independent thought.

Well, you are still good for giggles.

Shame I can't say likewise. No offence but you're really boring, quite arrogant and just a fraction liberal for a republican.
 

Forum List

Back
Top