Pumpkin Row
Platinum Member
- May 26, 2016
- 5,692
- 2,811
- 1,095
It wasn't that sort of debate, though. He couldn't make up quite as many lies as Hillary because he didn't practice as much. Poor Oompa Loopma.Bringing facts was unfair because The Don don't need to stinkin' facts.Woah fella...I was agreeing with you!Lies have a much more well known Liberal bias.He helped her by bringing facts."The moderator, Lester Holt, helped.”
Even the NY Times homosexual writers realized Holt was actively helping Hillary.
I knew the debate was going to be a bias blowout when Holt opened his mouth for his first sentence and found it to be a paraphrase of, “Now that Obama has made the economy wonderful and gave us all jobs for the last 8 years"
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/27/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump.html
Facts have a well-known Liberal bias.
It was unfair for Lester to bring facts along and push The Don to answer the question.
How is bringing facts and pushing for an actual answer being unfair? Hillary was pushed and she was able to answer (even in spite of the orange fluff doll interrupting her constantly, between drinks of water).
How was he supposed to know it was going to be that sort of debate?
He brought his rally slogans thinking that would be enough...completely unfair...many many people are saying it...many people...believe me.