California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,058
- 0
- Banned
- #201
The girlfriend's account does, or at least adds details Zimmy left out.
No it doesn't. Not in the least. How does anything she said prove that Zimmerman's story is wrong? Did Zimmerman say that Martin was not on the phone? Did Zimmerman say that Martin did not ask why he was following him? I've heard that account from the girlfriend mabny times. It does nothing to discount Zimmerman's story. Where do you see it?
Zimmy never mentions any words were exchanged between him and the kid. He never mentions the kid being on the phone. My question is why not? I would think that Zimmy would mention that since he's a wannabe fed and probably watches a lot of cop shows.
Then again he probably knew not to since it's been established the guy knew what to say and what not to to cover his tracks.
I was under the impression from the people on this board that Zimmy's story was that he got out of his car to look for a stop sign and the kid came out of nowhere and bashed him in the back of the head? Now I'm reading that his story was he chased the kid... lost him... turned around and the kid came out of nowhere and bashed him in the back of the head.
Girls story:
Chase... Verbal confrontation... scuffle...
Zimmermans story
Chase (maybe)... vicious from-behind attack...
Yes I see conflict here between the two stories. if he was viciously attacked from behind I don't see where the verbal confrontation came in. Was he talking to Trayvon with his back turned? Or after saying "what are you doing here" (paraphrased) did he just turn around and walk away and then get attacked?
Who asks a question and then just walks away before the question is answered? Sound like a crap story to me if the girls story is true.
A substantial amount of the problem, it seems to me, is that we have bits of information from a variety of sources.... that gives us part of the story. It does not give us the FULL story. It does not give us enough information to form a solid opinion regarding guilt or innocence... or if a crime was committed. Sadly, that does not seem to matter to many - they WANT him to be guilty... so they have decided he is.
The biggest question I have.... IF there was sufficient evidence, why was he not charged?
Is he guilty? I don't know. But I sure as hell do not want anyone tried by media, or found guilty by media... and I certainly don't agree with retribution by media. Guilt or innocence is not decided by public opinion - thank (insert appropriate deity here) for that.