Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 15,178
- 12,747
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #21
Ah, Crockford, the "polar bear researcher" who has never done field work. As is always the case with deniers, lack of qualification is what they regard as qualification.
Polar Bears doesn't seem to be bothered by low Arctic sea Ic
No, _one_ population has been growing, the Chukchi sea area, and that's been known for years. It was either very dishonest or very stupid to pretend that represented the global population.
So, we have a propaganda piece here. Ho hum. And all the deniers fell for it. Ho hum.
Principia Scientific International
How much of PSI's garbage have you fallen for? Are you also a greenhouse effect denier?
Your entire comment was dead on arrival since you were wrong on all of it starting with DOCTOR Crockford, who has a PHD in ZOOLOGY with 40 publications, mostly covering the Arctic region and various animals. With 35+ years of active service in research in the field and in Universities, she is well qualified to discuss Polar Bears.
The rest of your comments are too stupid to respond as I know you are a dishonest person. Dr. Crockfod NEVER said that one region represented all of them. Why lie so causally, when it can be spotted so easily for what it is?
There was ZERO propaganda in it since the data was from the Fish and WILDLIFE survey.