- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
Sounds like you've no more to say.....
Don't you want to elaborate on that.....enlighten us all a little....
In the midst of the car bombs, murders, and just people in general killing each other.....what exactly do you suggest, other than a large occupying force?
I, for one can't wait to hear your recommendations....
Of course..we all know that you could give a shit about hearing my recommendations...my point here was that NONE of your seven missions cut and pasted from the article is something that should or could or ought to be done by a large standing occupying army.
and you exhibit typical moronic alpha1 thinking....when your current strategy is not working, what else is there to do but continue it and assume that it will start working tomorrow...right? write?
The RAND study - which I just ordered this afternoon and cannot wait to read - suggests that "American military forces can't keep up with training local militaries to match the growth of Muslim insurgent groups. Police should be trained by professional police trainers." - (ergo: not soldiers)
and...
American military prowess should focus "on border and coastal surveillance, technical intelligence collection, air mobility, large-scale logistics, and special operations against high-value targets."
I have suggested long ago that pulling our troops to the border where they could interdict the supply of weapons from Iran and Syria would be a great first step.
But you think: Let's SURGE some more! right? write?