'New paradigm' moment as mRNA cancer vaccine developed by Covid shot maker Moderna

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2021
42,025
59,265
3,488
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
'New paradigm' moment as mRNA cancer vaccine developed by Covid shot maker Moderna slashes risk of tumor relapse or death in melanoma patients by 44%

...Pharma giants Merck and Moderna - who are co-developing the technological advance - heralded the results as a 'tremendous step forward' and a 'new paradigm' moment.

They will now 'rapidly' seek approval for a final stage clinical trial that will confirm the vaccine's efficacy on a much larger group of patients. If successful, it could be approved within six months of the study's end....

I've seen this movie:

 
That does it. I'm sleeping in my bathtub from now on, with my dog and my carbine.
Ditto, though I am substituting this for the dog,

51007116323_acb5bbfa9f_o.jpg
 
Melanoma is a major boomer remover. Now that conservatives have become vaccine deniers things can only get better as they die off quicker than the general population.
 
Melanoma is a major boomer remover. Now that conservatives have become vaccine deniers things can only get better as they die off quicker than the general population.
You, its you who is gonna be stone cold dead by 2025, perhaps sooner, even this winter.... Jab up sociopath, get that Biden Booster today, and remember that mask, wear that sucker full time all the time, even to bed each night, wear that fucker as a badge of fascist honor and glory.... Happy fucking trails to you! :banana:
 
I'm on this like the Covid Vaccine, take or don't take it if you think it might kill you or turn you into a zombie. Of course, like Covid, I have seen Cancer, up close. Not me personally, but my wife, and it was definitely going to kill her. No dangerous new vaccine to experience and be scared shitless by, just the usual standard fears, the Surgery, followed by the Radiation therapy, the Chemo therapy, the being sick and in pain, the vomiting, the hair loss, the weakness and more over months, before it was gone. For many, if they make it, this if followed by the bills, that cannot be walked away from, huge numbers, relatively healthy people have never seen before (though not really for us, as I knew it was probably coming and prepared, so I saw the numbers only in passing or in passing them on), but worth every cent and more.

I wish them luck with their new vaccine. I hope I or somebody close to me doesn't ever need it.
 
Pancreatic cancer is not often diagnosed until it's too late, but if you're lucky to catch it early this is promising.



Five years ago, a small group of cancer scientists meeting at a restaurant in a deconsecrated church hospital in Mainz, Germany, drew up an audacious plan: They would test their novel cancer vaccine against one of the most virulent forms of the disease, a cancer notorious for roaring back even in patients whose tumors had been removed.

The vaccine might not stop those relapses, some of the scientists figured. But patients were desperate. And the speed with which the disease, pancreatic cancer, often recurred could work to the scientists’ advantage: For better or worse, they would find out soon whether the vaccine helped.

On Wednesday, the scientists reported results that defied the long odds. The vaccine provoked an immune response in half of the patients treated, and those people showed no relapse of their cancer during the course of the study, a finding that outside experts described as extremely promising.

The study, published in Nature, was a landmark in the yearslong movement to make cancer vaccines tailored to the tumors of individual patients.

Researchers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, led by Dr. Vinod Balachandran, extracted patients’ tumors and shipped samples of them to Germany. There, scientists at BioNTech, the company that made a highly successful Covid vaccine with Pfizer, analyzed the genetic makeup of certain proteins on the surface of the cancer cells.

Using that genetic data, BioNTech scientists then produced personalized vaccines designed to teach each patient’s immune system to attack the tumors. Like BioNTech’s Covid shots, the cancer vaccines relied on messenger RNA. In this case, the vaccines instructed patients’ cells to make some of the same proteins found on their excised tumors, potentially provoking an immune response that would come in handy against actual cancer cells.

This is the first demonstrable success — and I will call it a success, despite the preliminary nature of the study — of an mRNA vaccine in pancreatic cancer,” said Dr. Anirban Maitra, a specialist in the disease at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, who was not involved in the study. “By that standard, it’s a milestone."

“It’s relatively early days,” said Dr. Patrick Ott of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Beyond that, “cost is a major barrier for these types of vaccines to be more broadly utilized,” said Dr. Neeha Zaidi, a pancreatic cancer specialist at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. That could potentially create disparities in access.

But the simple fact that scientists could create, quality-check and deliver personalized cancer vaccines so quickly — patients began receiving the vaccines intravenously roughly nine weeks after having their tumors removed — was a promising sign, experts said.

Since the beginning of the study, in December 2019, BioNTech has shortened the process to under six weeks, said Dr. Ugur Sahin, a co-founder of the company, who worked on the study. Eventually, the company intends to be able to make cancer vaccines in four weeks.

And since it first began testing the vaccines about a decade ago, BioNTech has lowered the cost from roughly $350,000 per dose to less than $100,000 by automating parts of production, Dr. Sahin said.

A personalized mRNA cancer vaccine developed by Moderna and Merck reduced the risk of relapse in patients who had surgery for melanoma, a type of skin cancer, the companies announced last month. But the latest study set the bar higher by targeting pancreatic cancer, which is thought to have fewer of the genetic changes that would make it ripe for vaccine treatments.

In patients who did not appear to respond to the vaccine, the cancer tended to return around 13 months after surgery. Patients who did respond, though, showed no signs of relapse during the roughly 18 months they were tracked.

Intriguingly, one patient showed evidence of a vaccine-activated immune response in the liver after an unusual growth developed there. The growth later disappeared in imaging tests.

“It’s anecdotal, but it’s nice confirmatory data that the vaccine can get into these other tumor regions,” said Dr. Nina Bhardwaj, who studies cancer vaccines at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Scientists have struggled for decades to create cancer vaccines, in part because they trained the immune system on proteins found on tumors and normal cells alike.

Tailoring vaccines to mutated proteins found only on cancer cells, though, potentially helped provoke stronger immune responses and opened new avenues for treating any cancer patient, said Ira Mellman, vice president of cancer immunology at Genentech, which developed the pancreatic cancer vaccine with BioNTech.

“Just establishing the proof of concept that vaccines in cancer can actually do something after, I don’t know, thirty years of failure is probably not a bad thing,” Dr. Mellman said. “We’ll start with that.”


 

Forum List

Back
Top