SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
In response to the barrage of recent posts by a certain member of this board, the vast majority of which reflect, and discuss nothing more than the output of computer models, I am going to post some recently published papers based on actual observation. The contrast is remarkable.
This paper, recently published in Geophysical Research Lettters looks at the surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region and found that only 17, out of the 109 stations have trends that are not explainable by natural variation, and out of those 17, only one showed a warming trend that is signifigant when compared to the three null models for climate change without human forcing.
On the statistical significance of surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region
On the statistical significance of surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region
This paper, recently published in Geophysical Research Lettters looks at the surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region and found that only 17, out of the 109 stations have trends that are not explainable by natural variation, and out of those 17, only one showed a warming trend that is signifigant when compared to the three null models for climate change without human forcing.
On the statistical significance of surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region
On the statistical significance of surface air temperature trends in the Eurasian Arctic region