eots
no fly list
That really means something coming from the site conspiracy theorist.
I think the conspiracy theorist would be the one hyping the Kent state ...terrorist theory...lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That really means something coming from the site conspiracy theorist.
Arson in this case = terrorism, nitwit.
Yeah. Why was the Guard called in again?
That's the part they like to pretend didn't happen. FOUR DAYS of that shit before shots were fired. That speaks of restraint, not some wild assed Guard members thirsting for the kill.
Never said anyone was "thirsting for the kill".
But FBI have statements that a few of the guardsman "had beads" on a few of the protestors that were unarmed and shot them.
You are not advocating shooting unarmed citizens are you?
Don't you require some evidence, something, anything to justify use of force?
The most basic POST standards IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR have those rules.
And the Ohio National Guard didn't go by anything close to that.
The closest student killed was 265 feet away. Unarmed.
Initial news accounts from the Ohio National Guard media people feeds:
"Numerous Guardsman killed and injured at Kent State" allover Ohio and nationally.
Sad to see that propaganda has lasted to this day.
That's the part they like to pretend didn't happen. FOUR DAYS of that shit before shots were fired. That speaks of restraint, not some wild assed Guard members thirsting for the kill.
Never said anyone was "thirsting for the kill".
But FBI have statements that a few of the guardsman "had beads" on a few of the protestors that were unarmed and shot them.
You are not advocating shooting unarmed citizens are you?
Don't you require some evidence, something, anything to justify use of force?
The most basic POST standards IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR have those rules.
And the Ohio National Guard didn't go by anything close to that.
The closest student killed was 265 feet away. Unarmed.
Initial news accounts from the Ohio National Guard media people feeds:
"Numerous Guardsman killed and injured at Kent State" allover Ohio and nationally.
Sad to see that propaganda has lasted to this day.
Bullshit. 40 years later and "suddenly" the FBI produces statements.
Let's get your lies straight. Throwing rocks and bottles is NOT unarmed. Most of those Guardsmen were the same age as those students, and trained every bit as well.
The fact is, the Dean told those students to get the Hell off his campus -- the one HE was responsible for and in control of.
You cannot justify the mob mentality of those students. Period. They just got lucky more weren't killed. They got off easy, IMO, considering they brought rocks and bottles to a gunfight.
Never said anyone was "thirsting for the kill".
But FBI have statements that a few of the guardsman "had beads" on a few of the protestors that were unarmed and shot them.
You are not advocating shooting unarmed citizens are you?
Don't you require some evidence, something, anything to justify use of force?
The most basic POST standards IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR have those rules.
And the Ohio National Guard didn't go by anything close to that.
The closest student killed was 265 feet away. Unarmed.
Initial news accounts from the Ohio National Guard media people feeds:
"Numerous Guardsman killed and injured at Kent State" allover Ohio and nationally.
Sad to see that propaganda has lasted to this day.
Bullshit. 40 years later and "suddenly" the FBI produces statements.
Let's get your lies straight. Throwing rocks and bottles is NOT unarmed. Most of those Guardsmen were the same age as those students, and trained every bit as well.
The fact is, the Dean told those students to get the Hell off his campus -- the one HE was responsible for and in control of.
You cannot justify the mob mentality of those students. Period. They just got lucky more weren't killed. They got off easy, IMO, considering they brought rocks and bottles to a gunfight.
Where have I justified the mob mentality of the students?
Where did I state some of the students did not have rocks and bottles?
So which is it there Moe? You speak out of both sides of your mouth. Is it the Dean's fault or the Guards' fault? And where did I state the Dean was not at fault?
Your shot gun approach is exactly the same as the Dean, the Governor and the Guard used.
All undisciplined and you are on board as well with that. I would have thought military men are disciplined.
And identify which of the students killed and wounded had rocks and bottles.
Talk about lies. Close the lid on the can you are holding.
The ROTC student killed brought rocks and bottles to the gunfight?
Prove that one. You know there is no evidence to prove that innocent ROTC student was not killed in cold blood. I thought you would overcome your ideological bias and have an open mind to the facts as a military man and support that ROTC student and his family.
But I was wrong. Your ideology blinds your common sense.
Bullshit. 40 years later and "suddenly" the FBI produces statements.
Let's get your lies straight. Throwing rocks and bottles is NOT unarmed. Most of those Guardsmen were the same age as those students, and trained every bit as well.
The fact is, the Dean told those students to get the Hell off his campus -- the one HE was responsible for and in control of.
You cannot justify the mob mentality of those students. Period. They just got lucky more weren't killed. They got off easy, IMO, considering they brought rocks and bottles to a gunfight.
Where have I justified the mob mentality of the students?
Where did I state some of the students did not have rocks and bottles?
So which is it there Moe? You speak out of both sides of your mouth. Is it the Dean's fault or the Guards' fault? And where did I state the Dean was not at fault?
Your shot gun approach is exactly the same as the Dean, the Governor and the Guard used.
All undisciplined and you are on board as well with that. I would have thought military men are disciplined.
And identify which of the students killed and wounded had rocks and bottles.
Talk about lies. Close the lid on the can you are holding.
The ROTC student killed brought rocks and bottles to the gunfight?
Prove that one. You know there is no evidence to prove that innocent ROTC student was not killed in cold blood. I thought you would overcome your ideological bias and have an open mind to the facts as a military man and support that ROTC student and his family.
But I was wrong. Your ideology blinds your common sense.
I speak out of both sides, huh? Wrong. I said it's the students faults from Day One.
And spare me the ideological bias blather. I don't have to prove nor disprove your pulling some wild-ass accusation out of your butt. YOU have to prove your accusation; which, you have failed to do in an exceptional manner.
Let's just break this down to simple common sense and logic, just for you. I have a gun. You have a rock and/or bottle. Guess who gets shot. Nothing ideological about THAT. Simple math.
Yet I'm supposed to stand there and let you brain me and not use what I have at my disposal as a means of self defense?
Your entire argument just plain sucks.
Where is your evidence Allie.
Anything, something, SOMEWHERE.
I can hear the ice rumbling in your glass.
Where is your evidence Allie.
Anything, something, SOMEWHERE.
I can hear the ice rumbling in your glass.
What evidence? Anyone with common sense and not some overly-dramatical sense of self and "their rights" -- which usually infringe on others' rights -- doesn't need a map to what happened.
Students illegally occupying a campus after being told to disperse attacked Army Nat'l Guard troops. If I have a rifle and you start throwing bottles at me, I'm going to sooner or later shoot your ass.
This just in: rocks and bottles hurt, so fuck you.