New Discovery Found From Ancient Israel

You are just confirming what we all know. That the West had every intention of screwing the non-Jews of Palestine. Unfortunately, for the Jews, the non-Jews have proven more resilient than they thought. The non-Jews are going nowhere and will soon substantially outnumber the Jews in the lands the Jews control. What then?
 
You are just confirming what we all know. That the West had every intention of screwing the non-Jews of Palestine. Unfortunately, for the Jews, the non-Jews have proven more resilient than they thought. The non-Jews are going nowhere and will soon substantially outnumber the Jews in the lands the Jews control. What then?
Those major arab settlers and squatters from the hood always wanted to redistribute what's not theirs, of course.
 

You are funny. I provide a scholarly paper that demonstrates that the Trans-Jordanians were various indigenous Muslim and Christian tribes, and were not Palestinians and you link to a propaganda piece published in Jerusalem called "Dangers of a Palestinian State". Unbelievable. Do you think before you post, or is Zionist propaganda so entrenched that you lot can't tell it's propaganda?
If it's propaganda it's for the Israelis and Jews. They need to know this stuff. BTW, how come Arab States don't let Palestine have their own country unless they run all the Jews into the sea. I am willing to bet if the Palis ever got rid of the Jews and had their own country, the rest of the Arab world would build a huge wall around it and blockade the coastline. What say you?
 

You are funny. I provide a scholarly paper that demonstrates that the Trans-Jordanians were various indigenous Muslim and Christian tribes, and were not Palestinians and you link to a propaganda piece published in Jerusalem called "Dangers of a Palestinian State". Unbelievable. Do you think before you post, or is Zionist propaganda so entrenched that you lot can't tell it's propaganda?
If it's propaganda it's for the Israelis and Jews. They need to know this stuff. BTW, how come Arab States don't let Palestine have their own country unless they run all the Jews into the sea. I am willing to bet if the Palis ever got rid of the Jews and had their own country, the rest of the Arab world would build a huge wall around it and blockade the coastline. What say you?

History has already prioven that withouit Israel's protection the Arab countries would again massacre the Palestinians.
 
You are just confirming what we all know. That the West had every intention of screwing the non-Jews of Palestine. Unfortunately, for the Jews, the non-Jews have proven more resilient than they thought. The non-Jews are going nowhere and will soon substantially outnumber the Jews in the lands the Jews control. What then?
Those major arab settlers and squatters from the hood always wanted to redistribute what's not theirs, of course.

Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

"in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921
 
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

Ahh, so you admit that all the Jews 'stole' was a lane. Hardly a whole country, lol. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.

But seriously. This thread starts about an archeological discovery in the land of Israel (the western portion of the Mandate for Palestine) and all you can do is deflect, detract, confuse and deny? Based upon all historical means necessary, what ever suits your purpose, Sara?
 
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

Ahh, so you admit that all the Jews 'stole' was a lane. Hardly a whole country, lol. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.

But seriously. This thread starts about an archeological discovery in the land of Israel (the western portion of the Mandate for Palestine) and all you can do is deflect, detract, confuse and deny? Based upon all historical means necessary, what ever suits your purpose, Sara?

Intersting how whenever something favorable to Israel is presented the Palestinian supporters just disappear or try to change the subject.
 
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

Ahh, so you admit that all the Jews 'stole' was a lane. Hardly a whole country, lol. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.

But seriously. This thread starts about an archeological discovery in the land of Israel (the western portion of the Mandate for Palestine) and all you can do is deflect, detract, confuse and deny? Based upon all historical means necessary, what ever suits your purpose, Sara?

Intersting how whenever something favorable to Israel is presented the Palestinian supporters just disappear or try to change the subject.

Not even a mention of any Palestinians when recorded history began. Golly gee, I wonder why that is? Boy that's a tough one, huh?
 
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

Ahh, so you admit that all the Jews 'stole' was a lane. Hardly a whole country, lol. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.

But seriously. This thread starts about an archeological discovery in the land of Israel (the western portion of the Mandate for Palestine) and all you can do is deflect, detract, confuse and deny? Based upon all historical means necessary, what ever suits your purpose, Sara?

Intersting how whenever something favorable to Israel is presented the Palestinian supporters just disappear or try to change the subject.

Not even a mention of any Palestinians when recorded history began. Golly gee, I wonder why that is? Boy that's a tough one, huh?

Weither is was philistines, the byzantian palaestina prima or the arabs of modern palestinian authority, they were all invaders to the land.
Most peoples of the world are invaders of migrants from some place else. Populations are not static.
Jews happen to have more history and religious connection to the land throughout time and documented history. They were there according to Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Greek, Roman, Persian and Arab historians and documents. They were rulers of the land with their own culture, language and religious beliefs. The god of Adam, Noah, Jacob, Issac, Joseph, Moses and Jesus has been adopted by christians and muslims alike. Jews and Israel are part of history and cannot be erased no matter what some modern palestinians try to say. The Temple was a historical fact as the most holy place to jews past and present. Jerusalem has been part of their prayers for three thousand years.
Jews were invited to return to their historic homeland by the ottomans in the 19th century, as a people. Individuals and families have been working their way home since the time of Moses.
Their identity has always been with Israel and Jerusalem, and always will be.
 
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane.

Ahh, so you admit that all the Jews 'stole' was a lane. Hardly a whole country, lol. Sorry, just couldn't help myself.

But seriously. This thread starts about an archeological discovery in the land of Israel (the western portion of the Mandate for Palestine) and all you can do is deflect, detract, confuse and deny? Based upon all historical means necessary, what ever suits your purpose, Sara?

Intersting how whenever something favorable to Israel is presented the Palestinian supporters just disappear or try to change the subject.

Not even a mention of any Palestinians when recorded history began. Golly gee, I wonder why that is? Boy that's a tough one, huh?

Weither is was philistines, the byzantian palaestina prima or the arabs of modern palestinian authority, they were all invaders to the land.
Most peoples of the world are invaders of migrants from some place else. Populations are not static.
Jews happen to have more history and religious connection to the land throughout time and documented history. They were there according to Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Greek, Roman, Persian and Arab historians and documents. They were rulers of the land with their own culture, language and religious beliefs. The god of Adam, Noah, Jacob, Issac, Joseph, Moses and Jesus has been adopted by christians and muslims alike. Jews and Israel are part of history and cannot be erased no matter what some modern palestinians try to say. The Temple was a historical fact as the most holy place to jews past and present. Jerusalem has been part of their prayers for three thousand years.
Jews were invited to return to their historic homeland by the ottomans in the 19th century, as a people. Individuals and families have been working their way home since the time of Moses.
Their identity has always been with Israel and Jerusalem, and always will be.

Excellent post Aris. So very true. Modern day Palestinians are overwhelmingly a bunch of squatters on Israel's land with no titles or deeds to it whatsoever.
 
You are just confirming what we all know. That the West had every intention of screwing the non-Jews of Palestine. Unfortunately, for the Jews, the non-Jews have proven more resilient than they thought. The non-Jews are going nowhere and will soon substantially outnumber the Jews in the lands the Jews control. What then?
Those major arab settlers and squatters from the hood always wanted to redistribute what's not theirs, of course.
Fortunately, there are source documents that confirm that the Jews are recent squatters that stole the lane. "in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants. The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921
So, how does that explain how those major arab settlers and squatters from the hood all got to be saudi sheiks to own(!) 90%(!) of the mandate palestine?
 

Forum List

Back
Top