New and Improved Version of 'Bush Did It"

[PatekPhilippe]

Only the members of the Select Senate Committee on Intelligence, not the full Senate as PeePee implies, were given the info and they were sworn to secrecy.

So that makes it OK right dumbass....it's OK if only the Senate Intel committee knew INCLUDING DASCHLE ... WHO LEADS THE SENATE....WHO COULD OF STOPPED IT!!!!

Your a tool edthedumbass....a tool

 

[edthecynic]

Try Google ed, and you have NO proof he said it in 2001, your own post cleary ties it to a CIA Unclassified report from 1999? Why are you debating your own post?!?!?!

One of your fellow travelers gave this link:
The Raw Story | Rediscovered testimony given by CIA director in 2001 suggests manipulation of pre-war intelligence
“We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since (Operation) Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs,” Tenet said in an agency report to Congress Feb. 7, 2001.

Now post a link to a quote from Tenet or a CIA report that says it was IRAN and not IRAQ as YOU falsely claimed. You won't post a direct link because you are the source of that lie.
If you google my quote and then click on the "Do you mean" link you get your post as the source of your IRAN lie.

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs" - Google Search

Ed....you're wasting your time rehashing bullshit and trying to justify your fucked up opinions....Dickie Durbin ADMITTED ON THE SENATE FLOOR THAT THERE WERE 2 SET'S OF INTELLIGENCE USED IN THE RUN UP TO WAR!!!! The piece of shit Dem's then chose their fucking jobs over DOING THE RIGHT THING!!!!

Now get that FACT through your head...OK!!!???

Only the members of the Select Senate Committee on Intelligence, not the full Senate as PeePee implies, were given the info and they were sworn to secrecy.

So that makes it OK right dumbass....it's OK if only the Senate Intel committee knew INCLUDING DASCHLE ... WHO LEADS THE SENATE....WHO COULD OF STOPPED IT!!!!

Your a tool edthedumbass....a tool

Half the Dems on the Committee voted against war and ALL the Republicans on the Committee voted for war and in your mind that makes the Dems pieces of shit for not stopping it but not the Republicans who supported it. If all the GOP voted against it they could have stopped it, so please explain how they are not pieces of feces, too!!!
To be called a "tool" by a Party hack is an honor indeed.
Thank you PeePee for the compliment.

 

[MajikMyst]

Ok?? So after spending the last hour or so reading all 15 pages of this thread.. Here is where we are..

About 50% or so of the liberals voted against the Iraq war..

Someone has called PP a liberal.. Which PP that is remains a mystery..

There is a complete psycho making big posts with lots of capital letters.. He also thinks Apple is a chair and not a computer..

WMD have not been found in Iraq.. WND says otherwise..

The troops were supposed to be home for christmas and Iraq was to pay us for the war with oil.. Neither of that happened..

The surge was done under Gates and not Rummy..

And all of the above to 15 pages.. And it still isn't settled..

So what do I think about all this?? I would rather not cause I don't want the psycho to write a big post about me with lots of caps..

 

[Chris]

The military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about so many years ago always has to have a threat to justify spending trillions of dollars of the taxpayers money on.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

One of your fellow travelers gave this link:
The Raw Story | Rediscovered testimony given by CIA director in 2001 suggests manipulation of pre-war intelligence
“We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since (Operation) Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs,” Tenet said in an agency report to Congress Feb. 7, 2001.

Now post a link to a quote from Tenet or a CIA report that says it was IRAN and not IRAQ as YOU falsely claimed. You won't post a direct link because you are the source of that lie.
If you google my quote and then click on the "Do you mean" link you get your post as the source of your IRAN lie.

"We do not have any direct evidence that Iraq has used the period since Desert Fox to reconstitute its WMD programs" - Google Search

Ed....you're wasting your time rehashing bullshit and trying to justify your fucked up opinions....Dickie Durbin ADMITTED ON THE SENATE FLOOR THAT THERE WERE 2 SET'S OF INTELLIGENCE USED IN THE RUN UP TO WAR!!!! The piece of shit Dem's then chose their fucking jobs over DOING THE RIGHT THING!!!!

Now get that FACT through your head...OK!!!???

Only the members of the Select Senate Committee on Intelligence, not the full Senate as PeePee implies, were given the info and they were sworn to secrecy.

So that makes it OK right dumbass....it's OK if only the Senate Intel committee knew INCLUDING DASCHLE ... WHO LEADS THE SENATE....WHO COULD OF STOPPED IT!!!!

Your a tool edthedumbass....a tool

Half the Dems on the Committee voted against war and ALL the Republicans on the Committee voted for war and in your mind that makes the Dems pieces of shit for not stopping it but not the Republicans who supported it. If all the GOP voted against it they could have stopped it, so please explain how they are not pieces of feces, too!!!
To be called a "tool" by a Party hack is an honor indeed.
Thank you PeePee for the compliment.

YES!!!! Because your fucked up Democrat Party took the high ground and said the Iraq war was unjust....WHEN YOU CONTROL THE SENATE YOU CONTROL WHAT LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS COME TO THE FLOOR FOR DEBATE...DASCHLE ALLOWED THE RESOLUTION TO PROCEED AND HE KNEW THERE WERE 2 SETS OF INTEL BEING USED...HE KNEW AND DID NOTHING!!!!!! Durbin knew and did nothing, Levin knew and did nothing...every Democrat on that committee knew and did nothing!!!!

 

[Article 15]

They were cowards who were more interested in what was politically popular at the time.

Can you imagine the outrage and accusations that would have flown if the Democrats stopped the AUMF from passing in the Senate?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

They were cowards who were more interested in what was politically popular at the time.

Can you imagine the outrage and accusations that would have flown if the Democrats stopped the AUMF from passing in the Senate?

If that would have happened...Bush would have been a 1 termer ... of that there is no doubt...maybe even impeached.

 

[edthecynic]

Ed....you're wasting your time rehashing bullshit and trying to justify your fucked up opinions....Dickie Durbin ADMITTED ON THE SENATE FLOOR THAT THERE WERE 2 SET'S OF INTELLIGENCE USED IN THE RUN UP TO WAR!!!! The piece of shit Dem's then chose their fucking jobs over DOING THE RIGHT THING!!!!

Now get that FACT through your head...OK!!!???

So that makes it OK right dumbass....it's OK if only the Senate Intel committee knew INCLUDING DASCHLE ... WHO LEADS THE SENATE....WHO COULD OF STOPPED IT!!!!

Your a tool edthedumbass....a tool

Half the Dems on the Committee voted against war and ALL the Republicans on the Committee voted for war and in your mind that makes the Dems pieces of shit for not stopping it but not the Republicans who supported it. If all the GOP voted against it they could have stopped it, so please explain how they are not pieces of feces, too!!!
To be called a "tool" by a Party hack is an honor indeed.
Thank you PeePee for the compliment.

YES!!!! Because your fucked up Democrat Party took the high ground and said the Iraq war was unjust....WHEN YOU CONTROL THE SENATE YOU CONTROL WHAT LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS COME TO THE FLOOR FOR DEBATE...DASCHLE ALLOWED THE RESOLUTION TO PROCEED AND HE KNEW THERE WERE 2 SETS OF INTEL BEING USED...HE KNEW AND DID NOTHING!!!!!! Durbin knew and did nothing, Levin knew and did nothing...every Democrat on that committee knew and did nothing!!!!

You show your blind hatred for Dems!

You say Derbin knew and did nothing, but he did the only thing he could do, he voted against it. Now the GOP knew and they ALL put reelection ahead of Country and did something, they voted for a senseless war at the expense of American lives and treasure. Only half of the Dems sunk that low, proving once again that no matter how bad the Dems are, and they are very, very bad, the GOP are far far worse.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Half the Dems on the Committee voted against war and ALL the Republicans on the Committee voted for war and in your mind that makes the Dems pieces of shit for not stopping it but not the Republicans who supported it. If all the GOP voted against it they could have stopped it, so please explain how they are not pieces of feces, too!!!
To be called a "tool" by a Party hack is an honor indeed.
Thank you PeePee for the compliment.

YES!!!! Because your fucked up Democrat Party took the high ground and said the Iraq war was unjust....WHEN YOU CONTROL THE SENATE YOU CONTROL WHAT LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS COME TO THE FLOOR FOR DEBATE...DASCHLE ALLOWED THE RESOLUTION TO PROCEED AND HE KNEW THERE WERE 2 SETS OF INTEL BEING USED...HE KNEW AND DID NOTHING!!!!!! Durbin knew and did nothing, Levin knew and did nothing...every Democrat on that committee knew and did nothing!!!!

You show your blind hatred for Dems!

You say Derbin knew and did nothing, but he did the only thing he could do, he voted against it. Now the GOP knew and they ALL put reelection ahead of Country and did something, they voted for a senseless war at the expense of American lives and treasure. Only half of the Dems sunk that low, proving once again that no matter how bad the Dems are, and they are very, very bad, the GOP are far far worse.

Sorry ed.....your precious Democrats are all fucked up too...Durbin could have FULFILLED HIS OATH OF OFFICE and put country ahead of his fucking job. but you being a left wing hack, much like Durbin, lack principles and ethics so your argument FAILS.

Better luck next time.

 

[rightwinger]

Ok?? So after spending the last hour or so reading all 15 pages of this thread.. Here is where we are..

About 50% or so of the liberals voted against the Iraq war..

Someone has called PP a liberal.. Which PP that is remains a mystery..

There is a complete psycho making big posts with lots of capital letters.. He also thinks Apple is a chair and not a computer..

WMD have not been found in Iraq.. WND says otherwise..

The troops were supposed to be home for christmas and Iraq was to pay us for the war with oil.. Neither of that happened..

The surge was done under Gates and not Rummy..

And all of the above to 15 pages.. And it still isn't settled..

So what do I think about all this?? I would rather not cause I don't want the psycho to write a big post about me with lots of caps..

I think that pretty much sums it up

 

[edthecynic]

YES!!!! Because your fucked up Democrat Party took the high ground and said the Iraq war was unjust....WHEN YOU CONTROL THE SENATE YOU CONTROL WHAT LAWS AND RESOLUTIONS COME TO THE FLOOR FOR DEBATE...DASCHLE ALLOWED THE RESOLUTION TO PROCEED AND HE KNEW THERE WERE 2 SETS OF INTEL BEING USED...HE KNEW AND DID NOTHING!!!!!! Durbin knew and did nothing, Levin knew and did nothing...every Democrat on that committee knew and did nothing!!!!

You show your blind hatred for Dems!

You say Derbin knew and did nothing, but he did the only thing he could do, he voted against it. Now the GOP knew and they ALL put reelection ahead of Country and did something, they voted for a senseless war at the expense of American lives and treasure. Only half of the Dems sunk that low, proving once again that no matter how bad the Dems are, and they are very, very bad, the GOP are far far worse.

Sorry ed.....your precious Democrats are all fucked up too...Durbin could have FULFILLED HIS OATH OF OFFICE and put country ahead of his fucking job. but you being a left wing hack, much like Durbin, lack principles and ethics so your argument FAILS.

Better luck next time.

They're not my Dems, I voted 3rd Party, but they are your Republicans who didn't even vote against the war as well as failing to fulfill their oath of office. So again, as bad as Durbin was, EVERY Republican was WORSE.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I voted 3rd Party

I wish more people would take their head out of their ass and do the same. The Republicans and Democrats are destroying this country.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

In his speech last night, President Obama claimed that he was coming to the rescue of embattled American troops in Aghanistan, unlike the naughty and oblivious Bush Administration:

'In his speech to the nation last night, President Obama claimed that ‘Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive.’ '

That's some big mystery, to you, huh???

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmtPBTybQ9k[/ame]​

Upon hearing this, former Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld chanted something about "pants on fire," including phrases such as

"does a disservice to the truth"

" a bald misstatement"

and went on to suggest a verification process:

" I suggest that the Congress review the President’s assertion in the forthcoming debate and determine exactly what requests were made, who made them, and where and why in the chain of command they were denied.”

Did President 'Hope and Change" fib?

Say it ain't so, Joe.

Flyboy-Rummy????

You're quoting THAT fuck-up??????????????

.

.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I have to admit, Rummy was a colossal mistake. But, there have been many.. can we say McNamara and his Wiz kids? It isn't like Bush invented bad Defense Secretaries.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I have to admit, Rummy was a colossal mistake. But, there have been many.. can we say McNamara and his Wiz kids? It isn't like Bush invented bad Defense Secretaries.

No doubt a result o' Lil' Dumbya's vast military-experience....he'd decided an ex-flight-instructor was a prime-candidate for Sec. of Defense.

Talk about the blind, leading the blind.

​

 

[Wry Catcher]

In his speech last night, President Obama claimed that he was coming to the rescue of embattled American troops in Aghanistan, unlike the naughty and oblivious Bush Administration:

'In his speech to the nation last night, President Obama claimed that ‘Commanders in Afghanistan repeatedly asked for support to deal with the reemergence of the Taliban, but these reinforcements did not arrive.’ '

Upon hearing this, former Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld chanted something about "pants on fire," including phrases such as

"does a disservice to the truth"

" a bald misstatement"

and went on to suggest a verification process:

" I suggest that the Congress review the President’s assertion in the forthcoming debate and determine exactly what requests were made, who made them, and where and why in the chain of command they were denied.”

Did President 'Hope and Change" fib?

Say it ain't so, Joe.

Rumsfeld denies Obama claim - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

Is anything Secretary Rumsfield says about the time he lead our troops worthy of belief?
The callous conservative chic like to characterizes President Obama's first two years in office as a failure. A true and honest definiton of a failed presidency is that of Bush&Co; asleep on the watch and America was attacked, not by a foreign Navy, not by a Foreign Army, but by 19 young men.
Then, in a knee jerk reaction, Bush&Co invades two nations, takes his eye off the ball and leaves Afghanistan to invade Iraq on false pretenses, and remains on the ground far longer than it took FDR to defeat Germany and Japan.
Carrying out his war on a noun, Bush took the cost of the war off the books and in so doing ballooned the deficit from 6.2 billion to almost one trillion dollars in six years (source: 2010 Almanac, U.S. Deficits and debt, 1949 - 2009).