Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
HAHAHAHAHAAH
busted
busted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You expect the opposition to disagree with a president who has moved the country farther to the left than any chief executive since FDR. And indeed, the changes have been epic, whether it's the nationalization of health care, the $700 billion in bailouts, the $862 billion in failed stimulus, the takeover of the car industry or attempts to control Wall Street.
Second paragraph says it all. "I am a right wing conservative and I am unhappy with anything this popularly elected administration does"
All items noted were major successes and were achieved despite right wing obstruction
You couldn't prove a single one was a success if your life depended on it... And I'm not even arguing for you to prove even 1 was a "major" success as you put it. Success would be saying the problem was solved being that's what was promised, and if you think the problem is solved I urge you to stop posting or talking to any other human beings as you only hurt and embarrass us as a species.
Second paragraph says it all. "I am a right wing conservative and I am unhappy with anything this popularly elected administration does"
All items noted were major successes and were achieved despite right wing obstruction
You couldn't prove a single one was a success if your life depended on it... And I'm not even arguing for you to prove even 1 was a "major" success as you put it. Success would be saying the problem was solved being that's what was promised, and if you think the problem is solved I urge you to stop posting or talking to any other human beings as you only hurt and embarrass us as a species.
Nationalization of health care- Shows the bias of the original article. The Public Option was not included in the Bill, hence no "nationalization" Healthcare bill was the most sweeping health legislation in 100 years.
$700 billion in bailout- Bush deserves credit too. Once the banks started to collapse, the financial industry went into a panic and the market fell 7000 points. Bailout showed the government would stand behind the financial sector and saved us from a Depression
$862 billion in failed stimulus,- again showing rightwing bias. Stimulus provided states with much needed capital and saved the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Police, Firemen and Teachers
Takeover of the car industry - The first option was to find foreign investors willing to stand behind our auto industry. When that failed to occur, the US Government stepped in and stood behind GM and Chrysler. They also demanded collateral like any other investor. Auto companies saved, millions of jobs saved, loans repaid, GM and Chrysler solvent
Attempts to control Wall Street.- Not an attempt, a success to keep Wall Street from returning to the unchecked greed which caused a global financial collapse
The sycophancy we see now is partially based on desperation. They see their goal within reach, and close to succeeding in ending the constitution and create their much vaunted leftist utopian fantasy of centralized control. They saw hints of it back in the 70's when their idealism was fresh. Now it has grown stale by 30 years and they are desperate to justify these ideals, lest they have to admit the truth about their beliefs and the evil on which it is founded.Back in 77 the Press was enthusiastic for Carter, but never sycophantic like they were at the beginning of the 0bama's term.
I don't want to see the kind of international derision that Carter engendered. That was very dangerous then, it is even more dangerous now.
Second paragraph says it all. "I am a right wing conservative and I am unhappy with anything this popularly elected administration does"
All items noted were major successes and were achieved despite right wing obstruction
You couldn't prove a single one was a success if your life depended on it... And I'm not even arguing for you to prove even 1 was a "major" success as you put it. Success would be saying the problem was solved being that's what was promised, and if you think the problem is solved I urge you to stop posting or talking to any other human beings as you only hurt and embarrass us as a species.
Nationalization of health care- Shows the bias of the original article. The Public Option was not included in the Bill, hence no "nationalization" Healthcare bill was the most sweeping health legislation in 100 years.
$700 billion in bailout- Bush deserves credit too. Once the banks started to collapse, the financial industry went into a panic and the market fell 7000 points. Bailout showed the government would stand behind the financial sector and saved us from a Depression
$862 billion in failed stimulus,- again showing rightwing bias. Stimulus provided states with much needed capital and saved the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Police, Firemen and Teachers
Takeover of the car industry - The first option was to find foreign investors willing to stand behind our auto industry. When that failed to occur, the US Government stepped in and stood behind GM and Chrysler. They also demanded collateral like any other investor. Auto companies saved, millions of jobs saved, loans repaid, GM and Chrysler solvent
Attempts to control Wall Street.- Not an attempt, a success to keep Wall Street from returning to the unchecked greed which caused a global financial collapse
The sycophancy we see now is partially based on desperation. They see their goal within reach, and close to succeeding in ending the constitution and create their much vaunted leftist utopian fantasy of centralized control. They saw hints of it back in the 70's when their idealism was fresh. Now it has grown stale by 30 years and they are desperate to justify these ideals, lest they have to admit the truth about their beliefs and the evil on which it is founded.Back in 77 the Press was enthusiastic for Carter, but never sycophantic like they were at the beginning of the 0bama's term.
I don't want to see the kind of international derision that Carter engendered. That was very dangerous then, it is even more dangerous now.
Why are we beating a dead horse? Everybody knows obama is a failure. But for some odd reason he is still getting his agenda passed.
You couldn't prove a single one was a success if your life depended on it... And I'm not even arguing for you to prove even 1 was a "major" success as you put it. Success would be saying the problem was solved being that's what was promised, and if you think the problem is solved I urge you to stop posting or talking to any other human beings as you only hurt and embarrass us as a species.
Nationalization of health care- Shows the bias of the original article. The Public Option was not included in the Bill, hence no "nationalization" Healthcare bill was the most sweeping health legislation in 100 years.
$700 billion in bailout- Bush deserves credit too. Once the banks started to collapse, the financial industry went into a panic and the market fell 7000 points. Bailout showed the government would stand behind the financial sector and saved us from a Depression
$862 billion in failed stimulus,- again showing rightwing bias. Stimulus provided states with much needed capital and saved the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Police, Firemen and Teachers
Takeover of the car industry - The first option was to find foreign investors willing to stand behind our auto industry. When that failed to occur, the US Government stepped in and stood behind GM and Chrysler. They also demanded collateral like any other investor. Auto companies saved, millions of jobs saved, loans repaid, GM and Chrysler solvent
Attempts to control Wall Street.- Not an attempt, a success to keep Wall Street from returning to the unchecked greed which caused a global financial collapse
If it hadn't been for an all out cry from the majority of the PEOPLE in America we would have the liberal golden ring of the Public option If it hadn't been for groups like the tea party that is.
Never since Carter?
How about comparing to Reagan in July of 1982?
Never since Carter?
How about comparing to Reagan in July of 1982?
The two are polar opposites. Reagan's economic policies brought us out of a recession and into a roaring economy. Obama's policies will do no such thing because they are hostile to business and economic growth.
Why are we beating a dead horse? Everybody knows obama is a failure. But for some odd reason he is still getting his agenda passed.
The odd reason is that is what "We the People" elected him to do
Never since Carter?
How about comparing to Reagan in July of 1982?
The two are polar opposites. Reagan's economic policies brought us out of a recession and into a roaring economy. Obama's policies will do no such thing because they are hostile to business and economic growth.
What were Reagans policies? Deficit Spending
He tripled the existing deficit
If Obamas policies are hostile to business and economic growth, Why has the GDP been increasing while it collapsed under Bush's "business friendly" policies
Why are we beating a dead horse? Everybody knows obama is a failure. But for some odd reason he is still getting his agenda passed.
The odd reason is that is what "We the People" elected him to do
We the people did not vote for this agenda, We voted for a moderate liberal Democrat who apparently never existed and was just a suit worn by a radical Left winger.
The two are polar opposites. Reagan's economic policies brought us out of a recession and into a roaring economy. Obama's policies will do no such thing because they are hostile to business and economic growth.
What were Reagans policies? Deficit Spending
He tripled the existing deficit
If Obamas policies are hostile to business and economic growth, Why has the GDP been increasing while it collapsed under Bush's "business friendly" policies
Collapsed? Really lol.
GDP grew almost every Year bush was in office. Interestingly enough it only started to shirk after a Democrat congress was in power.
Interesting which facts you choose to omit and which you focus on.
Why are we beating a dead horse? Everybody knows obama is a failure. But for some odd reason he is still getting his agenda passed.
The odd reason is that is what "We the People" elected him to do
We the people did not vote for this agenda, We voted for a moderate liberal Democrat who apparently never existed and was just a suit worn by a radical Left winger.
Nationalization of health care- Shows the bias of the original article. The Public Option was not included in the Bill, hence no "nationalization" Healthcare bill was the most sweeping health legislation in 100 years.
$700 billion in bailout- Bush deserves credit too. Once the banks started to collapse, the financial industry went into a panic and the market fell 7000 points. Bailout showed the government would stand behind the financial sector and saved us from a Depression
$862 billion in failed stimulus,- again showing rightwing bias. Stimulus provided states with much needed capital and saved the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Police, Firemen and Teachers
Takeover of the car industry - The first option was to find foreign investors willing to stand behind our auto industry. When that failed to occur, the US Government stepped in and stood behind GM and Chrysler. They also demanded collateral like any other investor. Auto companies saved, millions of jobs saved, loans repaid, GM and Chrysler solvent
Attempts to control Wall Street.- Not an attempt, a success to keep Wall Street from returning to the unchecked greed which caused a global financial collapse
If it hadn't been for an all out cry from the majority of the PEOPLE in America we would have the liberal golden ring of the Public option If it hadn't been for groups like the tea party that is.
We can only hope that we will eventually come to our senses and bring in an effective Government Option
In the mean time, morons like bigreb will continue to claim we have nationalized healthcare