Nevada to join National Popular Vote compact

The vote of the people went against Trump.
Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.
Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.
 
You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.

That's nice. Suppose the voters all vote for one candidate and the State awards the votes to the other. They would totally disenfranchise the voters in their State.
 
Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.
Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.

The courts will toss it as they should.
 
The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote


That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

The Party Of Filth:
"We are struggling to get wetbacks to spread out around the nation to assist us in winning national elections...what should we do?"
"Lets get all the shithole states to take voting rights from their citizens and concede to the the wetback infested shithole of Mexifornia...we know we will always own the asses of wetbacks, we can trust them."

Sorry, Mississippi and Alabama aren't in the compact.

You mean those two states weighed down by poor black people?
That's fucked up you racist.
 
Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.
Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.
Courts cannot amend the Constitution to dictate how states can allocate their votes
 
Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.
Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.

I'm sure there will be a court challenge. In the mean time you have completely failed to make your case. You resorted to name calling and a strawman argument.
 
The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote


That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.
Nevada is getting better and better. Now it also has a majority of women in its state legislature.

Yeah, but non that pander to stupid dukes who lie about being military jet pilots.
A very interesting post......:71:


A very true post as well.
How so?
 
You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.
Where were all these CRCs crying "UNCONSTITUTIONAL!" when some states chose to split their Electoral College votes?
 
You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.

That's nice. Suppose the voters all vote for one candidate and the State award the votes to the other. They would totally disenfranchise the voters in their State.

Give me a past exmaple where California's votes would have gone ot the popular vote winner even though California voted for the other candidate. Have fun.

So far all we have is the electoral college picking the loser, twice within 20 years.
 
Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.

I'm sure there will be a court challenge. In the mean time you have completely failed to make your case. You resorted to name calling and a strawman argument.
You wouldn't know a strawman argument if it slapped you in the face.....obviously
 
The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote


That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

The Party Of Filth:
"We are struggling to get wetbacks to spread out around the nation to assist us in winning national elections...what should we do?"
"Lets get all the shithole states to take voting rights from their citizens and concede to the the wetback infested shithole of Mexifornia...we know we will always own the asses of wetbacks, we can trust them."
Hush, hun.....the adults are talking.....:itsok:
 
Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.

That's nice. Suppose the voters all vote for one candidate and the State award the votes to the other. They would totally disenfranchise the voters in their State.

Give me a past exmaple where California's votes would have gone ot the popular vote winner even though California voted for the other candidate. Have fun.

So far all we have is the electoral college picking the loser, twice within 20 years.

Look it up yourself.
 
You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.
Where were all these CRCs crying "UNCONSTITUTIONAL!" when some states chose to split their Electoral College votes?

Good question.

When it comes down to it, why are they afraid of the will of ALL people?
 
Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.
You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win. :auiqs.jpg:

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new
We'll have a wait and see in the courts, won't we? Now run along and fetch me a sammich, darling.

I'm sure there will be a court challenge. In the mean time you have completely failed to make your case. You resorted to name calling and a strawman argument.
You wouldn't know a strawman argument if it slapped you in the face.....obviously

You argued against a point someone didn't make. What do you call that?
 
Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.
Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.
Where were all these CRCs crying "UNCONSTITUTIONAL!" when some states chose to split their Electoral College votes?

Good question.

When it comes down to it, why are they afraid of the will of ALL people?

Sane people know...its the "will" of the wetbacks in Mexifornia.
But, but, but...RUSSIA!
 
our tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

You mean folks like Putin and KJU are now in the democratic tent???...........LOL
Bermie, Pocahantas and AOC are no where to be found in the republican tent......LOL!!!!
All they have to do is write Trump a love letter
No, they would have to flip over and become capitalists, BlackFlag.
Trump has expressed great admiration for non-capitalists before. Which I was helping lead you to realize with the “love letter” reference.
 
Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?
Here is the portion of the Constitution, Article II that talks of the Electoral College.

Article II, Clause 2:

(extra removed).
there should be a comma after Article II.

if you're going to correct grammar it would be prudent to not screw up the very first sentence your very next post.

Right over your head.
not really. bo seemed to be bagging on someone for a grammar error then proceeded to make his own.

didn't read nor care about the rest of the posting. this will go to SCOTUS and they get to figure it out.
It may very well go to SCOTUS, but there is precedent, you know.....there are states that already changed how they distribute their electoral votes from the more common "winner take all" model, which btw ISN'T in the Constitution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top