Nevada to join National Popular Vote compact

[Meister]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

 

[rightwinger]

Why are Republicans so upset by this?

Don’t they think they can win the popular vote anymore?

One has to wonder.

This helps Republicans

Before, they had no chance of winning California, NY, NJ or New England

Now, simply by winning the popular vote, they win them all

 

[Meister]

Nevada is no longer governed by old, white xenophobic and misogynistic folks....and in the next few years TX and FL will also follow suit.

Republicans have REFUSED to widen their tent........and this is the consequence; unless the GOP abandons its somewhat racist stance, a republican will only see the oval office as a tourist.

Your tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

 

[rightwinger]

Nevada is no longer governed by old, white xenophobic and misogynistic folks....and in the next few years TX and FL will also follow suit.

Republicans have REFUSED to widen their tent........and this is the consequence; unless the GOP abandons its somewhat racist stance, a republican will only see the oval office as a tourist.

Your tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

And the GOP tent has widened with racists, bigots and fear mongerers

What will Republicans do once they run out of racists?
Create new ones by spreading hate against Mexicans, Muslims, gays

 

[bodecea]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Progressives need their own country, one far, far away that does not share a border with our USA

 

[BlackFlag]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

 

[bodecea]

Nevada is no longer governed by old, white xenophobic and misogynistic folks....and in the next few years TX and FL will also follow suit.

Republicans have REFUSED to widen their tent........and this is the consequence; unless the GOP abandons its somewhat racist stance, a republican will only see the oval office as a tourist.

Your tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

Oh dear.....widened vs narrowed......something tells me that CRCs are on the losing end here demographically. No wonder there's panic in the Rightwing tent.

 

[Claudette]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

 

[bodecea]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

 

[bodecea]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Ok......tell us where in the Constitution it forbids what they are doing. And how does it disenfranchise voters.....who vote for the state legislators who make these kinds of state decisions?

 

[bodecea]

I ask again....for those who say this is unConstitutional....WHERE in the Constitution is this forbidden?

 

[rightwinger]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

 

[Claudette]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

 

[Crixus]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Nevada is getting better and better. Now it also has a majority of women in its state legislature.

Yeah, but non that pander to stupid dukes who lie about being military jet pilots.

 

[HappyJoy]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA

Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.

 

[bodecea]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

"Guess you aren't to bright" I love these kinds of posts.

And I quoted the 12th Amendment along with Article II, both clauses 2 & 3....where does it forbid a state from deciding how to distribute its Electoral Votes?

Here is the 12th Amendment:

The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;

The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.[a]

The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.[1]

 

[iceberg]

and WHEN this eventually works against them, they'll whine it's not fair and want whatever else they can think of done to the system to ensure their wins.

 

[iceberg]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Here is the portion of the Constitution, Article II that talks of the Electoral College.

Article II, Clause 2:

(extra removed).

there should be a comma after Article II.

if you're going to correct grammar it would be prudent to not screw up the very first sentence your very next post.

 

[Meister]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

That is a very good question you should ask yourself.....what happened to states rights?
A state votes for one candidate, yet the electoral votes goes to the other candidate. Priceless.