Nevada to join National Popular Vote compact

[bodecea]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Nevada is getting better and better. Now it also has a majority of women in its state legislature.

Yeah, but non that pander to stupid dukes who lie about being military jet pilots.

A very interesting post......

 

[Claudette]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Ok......tell us where in the Constitution it forbids what they are doing. And how does it disenfranchise voters.....who vote for the state legislators who make these kinds of state decisions?

LMAO The Constitution doesn't forbid it you dumbass.

Oh and not all voters vote as their state legislators want them to vote. They vote as they see fit. Taking away that right disenfranchises their vote.

However the EC is in the Constitution.

The 12th Amendment.

 

[bodecea]

and WHEN this eventually works against them, they'll whine it's not fair and want whatever else they can think of done to the system to ensure their wins.

So you admit that such a law works both ways.....what's the problem then?

 

[Meister]

Nevada is no longer governed by old, white xenophobic and misogynistic folks....and in the next few years TX and FL will also follow suit.

Republicans have REFUSED to widen their tent........and this is the consequence; unless the GOP abandons its somewhat racist stance, a republican will only see the oval office as a tourist.

Your tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

Oh dear.....widened vs narrowed......something tells me that CRCs are on the losing end here demographically. No wonder there's panic in the Rightwing tent.

Says the commie.

 

[BlackFlag]

and WHEN this eventually works against them, they'll whine it's not fair and want whatever else they can think of done to the system to ensure their wins.

“Whatever else they can think of?” Do you think “popular vote” is some grand scheme that people had to think up? It’s literally how we do every single election in this country except the most important one. If a candidate gets more votes fair and square, people can whine about other Americans, but not the election results.

 

[Crixus]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

Nevada is getting better and better. Now it also has a majority of women in its state legislature.

Yeah, but non that pander to stupid dukes who lie about being military jet pilots.

A very interesting post......

A very true post as well.

 

[HappyJoy]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Seems you are the one who doesn’t know the Constitution
Show where it disallows it

Guess you aren't to bright.

What they are doing has nothing to do with The Constitution. So there is no allowing or not. However the EC is in the constitution.

That would be the 12th Amendment

As previously pointed out, the states get to decide how to distribute their EC votes and this does not violate the 12th.

 

[HappyJoy]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Here is the portion of the Constitution, Article II that talks of the Electoral College.

Article II, Clause 2:

(extra removed).

there should be a comma after Article II.

if you're going to correct grammar it would be prudent to not screw up the very first sentence your very next post.

Right over your head.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

The Party Of Filth:
"We are struggling to get wetbacks to spread out around the nation to assist us in winning national elections...what should we do?"
"Lets get all the shithole states to take voting rights from their citizens and concede to the the wetback infested shithole of Mexifornia...we know we will always own the asses of wetbacks, we can trust them."

 

[bodecea]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

That is a very good question you should ask yourself.....what happened to states rights?
A state votes for one candidate, yet the electoral votes goes to the other candidate. Priceless.

The state legislature made such a call to change how the votes are distributed. And the state legislature is elected by citizens of the state. If the citizens of the state do not like what their state legislature has done, they vote them out and put in new state legislators who do what the citizens of the state want.

Kindly note the word I have underlined.

 

[HappyJoy]

The Nevada Senate approved Tuesday a National Popular Vote bill on a party-line vote, sending the legislation aimed at upending the Electoral College to the governor.

Assembly Bill 186, which passed the Senateon a 12-8 vote, would bring Nevada into the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an agreement between participating states to cast their electoral votes for the winner of the popular vote.

If signed as expected by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak, Nevada would become the 16th jurisdiction to join the compact, along with 14 states and the District of Columbia. The compact would take effect after states totaling 270 electoral votes, and with Nevada, the total would reach 195.

Nevada Senate passes National Popular Vote bill on party-line vote

That’s 2 new states in less than 2 months. The NPV keeps chugging along.

The Party Of Filth:
"We are struggling to get wetbacks to spread out around the nation to assist us in winning national elections...what should we do?"
"Lets get all the shithole states to take voting rights from their citizens and concede to the the wetback infested shithole of Mexifornia...we know we will always own the asses of wetbacks, we can trust them."

Sorry, Mississippi and Alabama aren't in the compact.

 

[iceberg]

Totally Illegal and Unconstitutional and will be challenged at The Supreme Court Level and be shot down.

What's wrong Lib Tards?

Can't win anything honestly?

Here is the portion of the Constitution, Article II that talks of the Electoral College.

Article II, Clause 2:

(extra removed).

there should be a comma after Article II.

if you're going to correct grammar it would be prudent to not screw up the very first sentence your very next post.

Right over your head.

not really. bo seemed to be bagging on someone for a grammar error then proceeded to make his own.

didn't read nor care about the rest of the posting. this will go to SCOTUS and they get to figure it out.

 

[Meister]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA

Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.

You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win.

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

 

[HappyJoy]

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

That is a very good question you should ask yourself.....what happened to states rights?
A state votes for one candidate, yet the electoral votes goes to the other candidate. Priceless.

The state legislature made such a call to change how the votes are distributed. And the state legislature is elected by citizens of the state. If the citizens of the state do not like what their state legislature has done, they vote them out and put in new state legislators who do what the citizens of the state want.

Kindly note the word I have underlined.

Funny how they forget what states rights are when they don't like the way it turns.

 

[bodecea]

You bed wetters can't win according to the rules, so you have to change them.

It will fail as soon as it ends up in a court with non-bed wetter judges.

Seems Nevada along with the other idiot States who approve this don't know the Constitution.

They also want to disenfranchise their voters.

Won't be approved in court so they are wasting their time and money.

Ok......tell us where in the Constitution it forbids what they are doing. And how does it disenfranchise voters.....who vote for the state legislators who make these kinds of state decisions?

LMAO The Constitution doesn't forbid it you dumbass.

Oh and not all voters vote as their state legislators want them to vote. They vote as they see fit. Taking away that right disenfranchises their vote.

However the EC is in the Constitution.

The 12th Amendment.

Name calling?

And thank you for confirming that the Constitution does not forbid states from making their own STATES RIGHTS call on how their Electoral votes are distributed.

 

[Meister]

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

That is a very good question you should ask yourself.....what happened to states rights?
A state votes for one candidate, yet the electoral votes goes to the other candidate. Priceless.

The state legislature made such a call to change how the votes are distributed. And the state legislature is elected by citizens of the state. If the citizens of the state do not like what their state legislature has done, they vote them out and put in new state legislators who do what the citizens of the state want.

Kindly note the word I have underlined.

Disenfranchised Voters Kindly note the two words I have underlined.

 

[HappyJoy]

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The only thing I can take away from this is that the liberals really aren't concerned
with disenfranchising the vote of the people.
It's been a hoax all along.

The vote of the people went against Trump.

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

Looking at the post by BlackFlag you quoted....I don't see him saying "each state"....could you point out where he made that assertion, please? ....especially if you are using that comment as the basis for your saying it's a "stupid ass argument". TIA

Classic straw man argument Meister just made. However, I've already discovered he doesn't know what a straw man argument is.

You still haven't figured it out, darling. Make up another one of your scenarios for the win.

The Bill up for a vote won't fly in the courts and I really doubt with most level headed voters, either.

Per usual you have completely failed to make a point. Where in the constitution does it say that the states must distribute their ec votes?

Why do you have no idea how this works, mod? The NVC is not new

 

[bodecea]

Nevada is no longer governed by old, white xenophobic and misogynistic folks....and in the next few years TX and FL will also follow suit.

Republicans have REFUSED to widen their tent........and this is the consequence; unless the GOP abandons its somewhat racist stance, a republican will only see the oval office as a tourist.

Your tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

Oh dear.....widened vs narrowed......something tells me that CRCs are on the losing end here demographically. No wonder there's panic in the Rightwing tent.

Says the commie.

Ah....and here we have it.....nothing but name calling.....calling a veteran of our military who served during the Cold War a "commie"...calling a poster who obviously knows more about our country's Constitution and our federal vs. state form of Representative Democracy a "commie".

I accept your surrender in this discussion.

 

[bodecea]

Each state? What a stupid ass argument you present.

The vote of the people went against Trump. I understand why you want to end that conversation and talk about states, and I do not sympathize.

What happened to the CRC support for states rights? It seems to have gone "poof!"

That is a very good question you should ask yourself.....what happened to states rights?
A state votes for one candidate, yet the electoral votes goes to the other candidate. Priceless.

The state legislature made such a call to change how the votes are distributed. And the state legislature is elected by citizens of the state. If the citizens of the state do not like what their state legislature has done, they vote them out and put in new state legislators who do what the citizens of the state want.

Kindly note the word I have underlined.

Disenfranchised Voters Kindly note the two words I have underlined.

How are voters disenfranchised? They are aware of how their state law stands when it comes to the counting of Electoral Votes.....if they are not happy with that, they vote in state legislators who change the law more to their liking. Not disenfranchised at all.

 

[nat4900]

our tent was widened with communists and socialists. Great example

You mean folks like Putin and KJU are now in the democratic tent???...........LOL