NBC News smears pro-life, pro-family org as ‘hate group,’ defends PornHub

[DrLove]

Pornhub is disgusting. Porn in general today is filled with the worst kinds of debauchery the world has ever seen. Ever.
I am a guy, a middle aged dude. So I along with virtually every man on the planet would be lying if they say they don't, at least occasionally, look at porn.
Not Pornhub.
Pornhub is overwhelmingly filled with faux incest, violent/aggressive sex and a demeaning of women that is off the charts.
But yet, strangely the weirdo left who are supposed to be the champions of women.. defend the worst purveyor of objectifying women on the planet.

I bet the biggest watchers of Pornhub are right wingers. You guys claim you are so Christians, but you do more dirt and spew more hate than anyone on the planet.

You Good Sir are correct!

Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers

While levels are fairly consistent across the US, eight of the top 10 pornography-consuming states voted Republican, says a study

www.newscientist.com

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You Good Sir are correct!

Look at this! One bigot patting the other on the back.

 

[DrLove]

Pornhub is disgusting. Porn in general today is filled with the worst kinds of debauchery the world has ever seen. Ever.
I am a guy, a middle aged dude. So I along with virtually every man on the planet would be lying if they say they don't, at least occasionally, look at porn.
Not Pornhub.
Pornhub is overwhelmingly filled with faux incest, violent/aggressive sex and a demeaning of women that is off the charts.
But yet, strangely the weirdo left who are supposed to be the champions of women.. defend the worst purveyor of objectifying women on the planet.

-------------- Link?

Link???
GO look at Pornhub main website dude.
You don't need anymore proof than that.
Jesus Christ

He says ^ after another Happy Ending on PornHub

 

[DrLove]

You Good Sir are correct!

Look at this! One bigot patting the other on the back.

So tell us Eric. Do you believe that Internet Porn should be banned?
Good luck with that

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Why do you imagine you can speak for me?

 

[Pogo]

Pornhub is disgusting. Porn in general today is filled with the worst kinds of debauchery the world has ever seen. Ever.
I am a guy, a middle aged dude. So I along with virtually every man on the planet would be lying if they say they don't, at least occasionally, look at porn.
Not Pornhub.
Pornhub is overwhelmingly filled with faux incest, violent/aggressive sex and a demeaning of women that is off the charts.
But yet, strangely the weirdo left who are supposed to be the champions of women.. defend the worst purveyor of objectifying women on the planet.

-------------- Link?

Link???
GO look at Pornhub main website dude.
You don't need anymore proof than that.
Jesus Christ

Yes, Link. You made an assertion, now BACK IT UP.

If I go to this "Pornhub" will I find the evidence of:

But yet, strangely the weirdo left who are supposed to be the champions of women.. defend the worst purveyor of objectifying women on the planet.

?

Just quote it and show it here. This is your burden of proof, yer gonna need something a little more substantive than "go look over there".

 

[iamwhatiseem]

So back to reality.....

In a nutshelll....

1) VISA, Mastercard and Discover take drastic action after an investigation by one of the most liberal newspapers in America shows Pornhub engages in all manner of unacceptable videos on their website.
2) NBC News and other liberals parrot the response of Pornhub initially making flimsy excuses and "oh the poor models can't make money"....
3) Conservatives applaud the move by these credit card companies, and it resulted in sweeping changes at Pornhub in which they removed 10,000's of videos, banned downloads, and banned 1000's of members who posted unacceptable content.

And liberals on this board take issue with conservatives for something that cleaned up the biggest website that hosted incestual, faux rape and dehumanizing videos of women.
And THAT is liberalism 101

 

[Pogo]

So back to reality.....

In a nutshelll....

1) VISA, Mastercard and Discover take drastic action after an investigation by one of the most liberal newspapers in America shows Pornhub engages in all manner of unacceptable videos on their website.
2) NBC News and other liberals parrot the response of Pornhub initially making flimsy excuses and "oh the poor models can't make money"....
3) Conservatives applaud the move by these credit card companies, and it resulted in sweeping changes at Pornhub in which they removed 10,000's of videos, banned downloads, and banned 1000's of members who posted unacceptable content.

And liberals on this board take issue with conservatives for something that cleaned up the biggest website that hosted incestual, faux rape and dehumanizing videos of women.
And THAT is liberalism 101

So you can't answer the previous post and try to whisk it away huh?

Nobody takes responsibility for their own droppings any more. And yet you just REPEATED the same ass-ertion, substituting "Liberals" for "the left", the distinction between which you seem clueless about.

But you won't back this up either, amirite?

Wanna dig yourself even deeper? Why don't you essplain to the class exactly what "Liberalism" means. And be sure to include the part about what the fuck it has to do with "Pornhub".

Go ahead. Tell us what you think Liberalism is and cite your sources.

 

[Pogo]

So back to reality.....

In a nutshelll....

1) VISA, Mastercard and Discover take drastic action after an investigation by one of the most liberal newspapers in America shows Pornhub engages in all manner of unacceptable videos on their website.
2) NBC News and other liberals parrot the response of Pornhub initially making flimsy excuses and "oh the poor models can't make money"....
3) Conservatives applaud the move by these credit card companies, and it resulted in sweeping changes at Pornhub in which they removed 10,000's of videos, banned downloads, and banned 1000's of members who posted unacceptable content.

And liberals on this board take issue with conservatives for something that cleaned up the biggest website that hosted incestual, faux rape and dehumanizing videos of women.
And THAT is liberalism 101

So you can't answer the previous post and try to whisk it away huh?

Nobody takes responsibility for their own droppings any more. And yet you just REPEATED the same ass-ertion, substituting "Liberals" for "the left", the distinction between which you seem clueless about.

But you won't back this up either, amirite?

Wanna dig yourself even deeper? Why don't you essplain to the class exactly what "Liberalism" means. And be sure to include the part about what the fuck it has to do with "Pornhub".

Go ahead. Tell us what you think Liberalism is and cite your sources.

And, two hours later there it is, right on time:

Typical stone silence when a bullshit claim gets its bullshit bluff called. One has to wonder what's going on during this intellectual recess.... presumably they're furiously scouring the internets in a desperate quest to substantiate said bullshit, only to find every page they read confirms that their flawed premise always was bullshit. That's when they sneak out the back door thinking "nobody will notice if I just disappear" -- like a child playing peek-a-boo.

Sad.

NEXT IN LINE PLEASE....

 

[Pogo]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

I don't play your game of semantics son. I just laugh at you here, you're trying to play the "it never said" the word defend and yet the entire articles was a tacit Definition of tacit
2: implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed
defense of the site, the industry and the sex "workers".

You're not in my league kid, never have been.

 

[Pogo]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

I don't play your game of semantics son. I just laugh at you here, you're trying to play the "it never said" the word defend and yet the entire articles was a tacit Definition of tacit
2: implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed
defense of the site, the industry and the sex "workers".

You're not in my league kid, never have been.

So you have no answer. Stand by Buddy Holly, you're on next.

I actually QUOTED your entire line, including "tacit", and challenged you to back it up. To show us ANYWHERE in the article any such implication was laid down. Any quote. Anywhere.
.
And you can't do it. You lose.

So yes I've told you before, you come around plopping bullshit around here, you *WILL* get called on it and see it exposed for the bullshit it is.

And you're damn right I ain't in your league. Think I left that level when I was about five.

 

[d0gbreath]

The Ruth Institute's mission is to halt the sexual revolution, sixty years too late.

Bless their hearts.

 

[buttercup]

It's the way of this upside-down world.

That reminds me of Isaiah 5:20

"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,
who put darkness for light and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"

 

[JustAGuy1]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

I don't play your game of semantics son. I just laugh at you here, you're trying to play the "it never said" the word defend and yet the entire articles was a tacit Definition of tacit
2: implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed
defense of the site, the industry and the sex "workers".

You're not in my league kid, never have been.

So you have no answer. Stand by Buddy Holly, you're on next.

I actually QUOTED your entire line, including "tacit", and challenged you to back it up. To show us ANYWHERE in the article any such implication was laid down. Any quote. Anywhere.
.
And you can't do it. You lose.

So yes I've told you before, you come around plopping bullshit around here, you *WILL* get called on it and see it exposed for the bullshit it is.

And you're damn right I ain't in your league. Think I left that level when I was about five.

You should have actually looked up it's meaning. The ENTIRE NBC article was a "tacit" defensed of the industry. I'm sorry son you should have done your homework. You failed to click n and read the NBC article, or if you did you completely misunderstood what you were reading. I do my homework, you need to do yours.

 

[JustAGuy1]

The Ruth Institute's mission is to halt the sexual revolution, sixty years too late.

Bless their hearts.

I get it, Christian Morality isn't your thing.

 

[Pogo]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

I don't play your game of semantics son. I just laugh at you here, you're trying to play the "it never said" the word defend and yet the entire articles was a tacit Definition of tacit
2: implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed
defense of the site, the industry and the sex "workers".

You're not in my league kid, never have been.

So you have no answer. Stand by Buddy Holly, you're on next.

I actually QUOTED your entire line, including "tacit", and challenged you to back it up. To show us ANYWHERE in the article any such implication was laid down. Any quote. Anywhere.
.
And you can't do it. You lose.

So yes I've told you before, you come around plopping bullshit around here, you *WILL* get called on it and see it exposed for the bullshit it is.

And you're damn right I ain't in your league. Think I left that level when I was about five.

You should have actually looked up it's meaning. The ENTIRE NBC article was a "tacit" defensed of the industry. I'm sorry son you should have done your homework. You failed to click n and read the NBC article, or if you did you completely misunderstood what you were reading. I do my homework, you need to do yours.

Once AGAIN stalling for time.

SHOW THE CLASS where there is any "defense" ---- or anything at all on the page other than simple reporting of "he said this, she said that".

You STILL can't do it.

And you WON'T be able to do it because it isn't there. You're a liar and you're now exposed, again.

 

[d0gbreath]

I get it, Christian Morality isn't your thing.

I hate it with a passion. Why can't they just impose it upon themselves?

 

[JustAGuy1]

I get it, Christian Morality isn't your thing.

I hate it with a passion. Why can't they just impose it upon themselves?

That is a failing both sides have, for example you would force me as a Baker to bake a cake for a homosexual wedding.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Let's move on to Round Two.

From the OP:

Then, on December 15, Olivia Solon, co-author of the December 9 story, did a piece tacitly defending PornHub.

Okay I read your link. The entire page. WHERE anywhere in there is the piece "defending PornHub"? I read numerous quotes from numerous sources. I could not find any call to action or value judgment. Where is it?

Start the clock. And stand by for Buddy Holly.

I don't play your game of semantics son. I just laugh at you here, you're trying to play the "it never said" the word defend and yet the entire articles was a tacit Definition of tacit
2: implied or indicated (as by an act or by silence) but not actually expressed
defense of the site, the industry and the sex "workers".

You're not in my league kid, never have been.

So you have no answer. Stand by Buddy Holly, you're on next.

I actually QUOTED your entire line, including "tacit", and challenged you to back it up. To show us ANYWHERE in the article any such implication was laid down. Any quote. Anywhere.
.
And you can't do it. You lose.

So yes I've told you before, you come around plopping bullshit around here, you *WILL* get called on it and see it exposed for the bullshit it is.

And you're damn right I ain't in your league. Think I left that level when I was about five.

You should have actually looked up it's meaning. The ENTIRE NBC article was a "tacit" defensed of the industry. I'm sorry son you should have done your homework. You failed to click n and read the NBC article, or if you did you completely misunderstood what you were reading. I do my homework, you need to do yours.

Once AGAIN stalling for time.

SHOW THE CLASS where there is any "defense" ---- or anything at all on the page other than simple reporting of "he said this, she said that".

You STILL can't do it.

And you WON'T be able to do it because it isn't there. You're a liar and you're now exposed, again.

Poor Pogo so deeply desperate for relevance, so incapable of ANY meaningful debate. The ENTIRE NBC article is a "tacit" defense of Pornhub and it's poor working girls.