2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,334
- 52,581
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #41
Why do you reject the proposal...... ? I am focusing on people who use guns for crime, and not bothering law abiding people in any way......
Criminals will switch from guns to any other weapon..... and we can stop hearing about gun crime....they will still bring it up, but the power they have, the emotional power, will be gone.
can you explain to me why being robbed or killed at gun point is different than at knife point??
you are still robbed or killed what they use is irrelevant
all this will do is support the anti-gun narrative...that guns are the problem and not the people,,
I can't....ask the people who want to ban guns that question. This thread is to address stopping criminals from using guns, and trying to keep the 2nd Amendment safe.
this will hurt the 2nd more than help it by admitting that guns are the problem and not the criminals,,
better to just enforce the laws we have and ignore the anti gun people until we cant,,,
compromise is never the solution
We are enforcing the existing laws, simply increasing the time served..... it only effects actual criminals, does not require any new laws....and it works.
There is no compromise here....compromise is giving in to universal background checks....which will lead to giving in to gun registration......
There is no need to register guns, no need for new background checks, no need for fees, taxes or new gun regulations...this deals with criminals...brutally....and leaves normal people alone.
so if you dont get this or some other compromise universal background checks will happen??
how about we stand firm and not allow either??
sorry but the 2nd is non negotiable,,,and making guns the center point of any new legislation just advances the anti gun movement,,,
Again...this doesn't make guns the center point of anything....it increases penalties for using a gun illegally. It really is that simple, it really is that effective.
This stops the anti-gun movement.