Mueller's team busted making ANTI-TRUMP texts...shouldn't an investigation be politically neutral?

[Rambunctious]

Oooooohhhhhh.....I'm shaking in my boots. May have wet my bloomers. Excuse me while I check.

Bloomers? don't show your age old lady...Did you know Lincoln?

 

[J.E.D]

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

 

[jillian]

Anti-Trump Text Messages Show Pattern Of Bias On Mueller’s Team

Oh, those liberals are corrupt to the core...

For nearly four months, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office, the Justice Department and the FBI have kept secret the fact that the FBI agent who oversaw the Russia investigation exchanged anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton text messages with an FBI attorney who was also his mistress.

Those messages, the existence of which were revealed in bombshell reports published over the weekend, highlight a pattern of the Mueller team.


Many of Mueller’s prosecutors — it has been extensively reported — have made campaign contributions to Clinton and other Democratic political candidates. And a review by The Daily Caller shows that Mueller lawyers involved in the cases against four Trump associates are Democratic donors.

But Peter Strzok’s text messages — which he exchanged with Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer who worked briefly on the Russia investigation — are perhaps the most significant evidence of anti-Trump bias uncovered so far on the Mueller team.

it was one person and that person is no longer on the team,
too bad there isn't anything you won't lie about.

 

[TheDude]

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

You folks seem to consider choosing to support one political party or individual running for President as being "biased." What you really want to do is penalize anyone that didn't support Trump and the Republicans. I haven't heard a peep from anyone about those who DIDN'T support the Democrats that are on the team. Supposedly, they supported the Repubs? So that's okay with you?
What you are asking for, based on your own rules, is for people who have shrugged off their duty and obligation as Americans to participate in the political process.
It's not your damned business who any of them voted for, or what campaign they supported.

If they show bias against those they are investigating, they are immediately booted off the team. So you should be glad of that.

You folks seem to consider choosing to support one political party or individual running for President as being "biased." What you really want to do is penalize anyone that didn't support Trump and the Republicans. Yep, Especially those who are not white. We may come after LGBT and women even if they did support Trump.

I haven't heard a peep from anyone about those who DIDN'T support the Democrats that are on the team. As your assigned grammar teacher and white republican male superior, I have to insist you rewrite this sentence.

Supposedly, they supported the Repubs? So that's okay with you? Who's talking about political support? We're talking political preference PLUS corruption within our "law enforcement" agencies under Obama, and the lasting affects.

What you are asking for, based on your own rules, is for people who have shrugged off their duty and obligation as Americans to participate in the political process. See grammar.

It's not your damned business who any of them voted for, or what campaign they supported. Cough, we're white republicans lady, and it's our business when we declare so.

If they show bias against those they are investigating, they are immediately booted off the team. So you should be glad of that. Sounds dreamy.

 

[OldLady]

Oooooohhhhhh.....I'm shaking in my boots. May have wet my bloomers. Excuse me while I check.

Bloomers? don't show your age old lady...Did you know Lincoln?

Mom said I was too young to date him; had fun with Andy Johnson though.

 

[JoeMoma]

FBI and the DOJ are facing contempt of Congress charges for hiding the reason this agent was fired.

This is a big f'n deal.

"Until now, Nunes said, the FBI and Department of Justice have failed to sufficiently comply with an Aug. 24 committee subpoena — including by refusing repeated demands “for an explanation of Peter Strzok’s dismissal from the Mueller probe.”

“In light of today’s press reports, we now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously refused to make Deputy Director McCabe available to the Committee for an interview,” Nunes said.

“By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility,” he said.


Nunes, in the statement, said the committee will move on a resolution by the end of the month unless its demands are “fully met” by the close of business Dec. 4.

He cited “a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee’s oversight work,” including also withholding subpoenaed information about their use of an opposition research dossier that targeted Trump in the 2016 election.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions would not be a target of any contempt action by the committee, Nunes has said, because he recused himself from any investigation into charges that Russia meddled in the election.


Congress: House Republicans see anti-Trump bias, say Justice Dept., FBI stonewalls panel

Eric Holder was held in contempt of congress! What became of that????? Nothing!!!!

 

[Rambunctious]

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

This so called investigation is invalid and was invalid from day one. Every lawyer on Mueller's team has ties to the democrat party and in some cases Clinton her self. It's a joke and it will not work. People are laughing at Mueller.

 

[J.E.D]

This witch hunt was designed to get enough dirt on Trump and his team to bring about not a conviction because there was no crime but to bring about an impeachment. Let me make this clear to the swamp. If you attempt to impeach Trump it will mean the end of you, the end of life time politicians, and the end of the media as we know it.
The march on DC will dwarf anything seen before.

Yeah sure. Like the pathetic turnout at the far right’s previous pro-Trump rallies?

 

[OldLady]

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

You folks seem to consider choosing to support one political party or individual running for President as being "biased." What you really want to do is penalize anyone that didn't support Trump and the Republicans. I haven't heard a peep from anyone about those who DIDN'T support the Democrats that are on the team. Supposedly, they supported the Repubs? So that's okay with you?
What you are asking for, based on your own rules, is for people who have shrugged off their duty and obligation as Americans to participate in the political process.
It's not your damned business who any of them voted for, or what campaign they supported.

If they show bias against those they are investigating, they are immediately booted off the team. So you should be glad of that.

You folks seem to consider choosing to support one political party or individual running for President as being "biased." What you really want to do is penalize anyone that didn't support Trump and the Republicans. Yep, Especially those who are not white. We may come after LGBT and women even if they did support Trump.

I haven't heard a peep from anyone about those who DIDN'T support the Democrats that are on the team. As your assigned grammar teacher and white republican male superior, I have to insist you rewrite this sentence.

Supposedly, they supported the Repubs? So that's okay with you? Who's talking about political support? We're talking political preference PLUS corruption within our "law enforcement" agencies under Obama, and the lasting affects.

What you are asking for, based on your own rules, is for people who have shrugged off their duty and obligation as Americans to participate in the political process. See grammar.

It's not your damned business who any of them voted for, or what campaign they supported. Cough, we're white republicans lady, and it's our business when we declare so.

If they show bias against those they are investigating, they are immediately booted off the team. So you should be glad of that. Sounds dreamy.

Good one. Especially As your assigned grammar teacher and white republican male superior, I have to insist you rewrite this sentence.

 

[J.E.D]

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

This so called investigation is invalid and was invalid from day one. Every lawyer on Mueller's team has ties to the democrat party and in some cases Clinton her self. It's a joke and it will not work. People are laughing at Mueller.

Nobody of importance is laughing at Mueller. He has managed four indictments with two guilty pleas so far. I doubt Trump is laughing. If so, it’s nervous laughter

 

[depotoo]

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that .

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

 

[tinydancer]

FBI and the DOJ are facing contempt of Congress charges for hiding the reason this agent was fired.

This is a big f'n deal.

"Until now, Nunes said, the FBI and Department of Justice have failed to sufficiently comply with an Aug. 24 committee subpoena — including by refusing repeated demands “for an explanation of Peter Strzok’s dismissal from the Mueller probe.”

“In light of today’s press reports, we now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously refused to make Deputy Director McCabe available to the Committee for an interview,” Nunes said.

“By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility,” he said.


Nunes, in the statement, said the committee will move on a resolution by the end of the month unless its demands are “fully met” by the close of business Dec. 4.

He cited “a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee’s oversight work,” including also withholding subpoenaed information about their use of an opposition research dossier that targeted Trump in the 2016 election.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions would not be a target of any contempt action by the committee, Nunes has said, because he recused himself from any investigation into charges that Russia meddled in the election.


Congress: House Republicans see anti-Trump bias, say Justice Dept., FBI stonewalls panel

Eric Holder was held in contempt of congress! What became of that????? Nothing!!!!

It is a blight on their legacy. And these men and women believe that they do have a legacy so the contempt charge does leave a mark.

 

[Rambunctious]

Nobody of importance is laughing at Mueller. He has managed four indictments with two guilty pleas so far. I doubt Trump is laughing. If so, it’s nervous laughter

By importance do you mean the entrenched members of the swamp? Or maybe the anti Trump media? Please...everyone I know is laughing because Mueller actually thinks this is going someplace...it's not... it's all made up and everyone is learning that today...

 

[OldLady]

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that .

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

Is that agent on Mueller's team?

 

[Rambunctious]

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that

Yep and the fact that he was still hired by Mueller shows the one sided investigation we have here.

 

[depotoo]

He is still with the FBI, as he was when he did the interview. Mueller was not part of the Clinton email investigation.

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that .

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

Is that agent on Mueller's team?

 

[JoeMoma]

FBI and the DOJ are facing contempt of Congress charges for hiding the reason this agent was fired.

This is a big f'n deal.

"Until now, Nunes said, the FBI and Department of Justice have failed to sufficiently comply with an Aug. 24 committee subpoena — including by refusing repeated demands “for an explanation of Peter Strzok’s dismissal from the Mueller probe.”

“In light of today’s press reports, we now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously refused to make Deputy Director McCabe available to the Committee for an interview,” Nunes said.

“By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility,” he said.


Nunes, in the statement, said the committee will move on a resolution by the end of the month unless its demands are “fully met” by the close of business Dec. 4.

He cited “a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this Committee’s oversight work,” including also withholding subpoenaed information about their use of an opposition research dossier that targeted Trump in the 2016 election.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions would not be a target of any contempt action by the committee, Nunes has said, because he recused himself from any investigation into charges that Russia meddled in the election.


Congress: House Republicans see anti-Trump bias, say Justice Dept., FBI stonewalls panel

Eric Holder was held in contempt of congress! What became of that????? Nothing!!!!

It is a blight on their legacy. And these men and women believe that they do have a legacy so the contempt charge does leave a mark.

But to them the mark is something to be proud of like a tattoo.

 

[OldLady]

He is still with the FBI, as he was when he did the interview. Mueller was not part of the Clinton email investigation.

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that .

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

Is that agent on Mueller's team?

If he isn't on Mueller's team, isn't it a little paranoid to worry about him? Do you really think Mueller would fail to cross his t's and dot his i's like that?

 

[depotoo]

You are totally missing the point. In what he had done already under the investigation, and with the fbi previously.

He is still with the FBI, as he was when he did the interview. Mueller was not part of the Clinton email investigation.

He was removed from Muellers investigation, but was the agent that interviewed a Hillary, with no recordings taken, or under oath. That questions the legitimacy of that interview. No way to spin that .

If you want your investigation to be taken seriously, the investigators should be unbiased.

It's just common sense, isn't it?

Yeah that’s why the agent in question was reassigned.

Should one agent displaying his personal views invalidate the whole investigation?

That’s ridiculous.

Is that agent on Mueller's team?

If he isn't on Mueller's team, isn't it a little paranoid to worry about him? Do you really think Mueller would fail to cross his t's and dot his i's like that?

 

[ColonelAngus]

So Trump and Putin colluded to rig the election......when are they going to get to that?