Mueller will testify publicly on July 17

This Spygate Poster should be in Every American's Living Room Proudly Displayed along side Family Heirlooms and Family Photos lovingly hung on the wall and framed.

John McCain, Harry Reid, Diane Feinsten, Adam Schiff, and James Wolfe were all heavily involved in the scam in Congress.

The White House and every Obama Staffer knew about the scam and so did The DNC and Clinton Campaign. There were multiple people in all branches of The Government involved in The COUP Plot.


Check out the poster, blow it up and you will be amazed at how many corrupt people Obama populated our government with.

Spygate: The True Story of Collusion [Infographic]

spygate-small.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mueller's testimony will consist of his reading from his report. He already said this is what he will do.
 
assuming Trump doesn't invoke executive privilege over him

That's some funny stuff.
Life sucks when you stage a COUP more fitting of a third world Nation than America, and then you fail at it.

Yeah yeah, we already "Coup'ed the House in 2018. And we're going for the "Coup" hat trick in 2020.

Beside, Executive Privileged covers presidential deliberations and conversations with the president. Mueller have any of those?
 
phony shit'

Yep "phony shit" laced with the typical hyperbole of a Rabid RW SJWer.
Thank you for clarifying that you are a 'reality denier, an ultra partisan libtard who refuses to acknowledge facts / evidence, even when it is a Democrat or one who is involved that you have been defending saying it / telling you what you don't want to hear.

:p
 
During his 10-Minute 'This is what I meant' public announcement (which his office issued a 'correction' to 30 minutes later), Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller begged Democrats NOT to subpoena him and force him to testify and answer questions under oath. If that happened, he vowed, he would refuse to answer questions and would only recite excerpts from his final Report.

Mueller's begging and threats not to answer questions did not work. Mueller is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees on July 17.


The FBI used a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, but both evidence and testimony (Steele, Ohr, Page - FBI) prove the Obama administration's Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agency Directors (Rosenstein, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey) illegally engaged in FISA Court abuses in order to illegally get those warrants.

"There is a more than reasonable chance that by that time, the Justice Department inspector general could release his highly anticipated report on the FBI’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) system in the early stages of the Russia probe."

"Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, a former federal prosecutor, will now get the opportunity to ask this question to Mueller as well, and the IG report may provide fodder for more targeted questioning. Related subjects that GOP committee members could bring up are precisely what led to the launching of the probe, and at what point in the two-year investigation did Mueller realize he did not have the evidence to show an illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia."

The Democrats have publicly stated that they are eager to get answers from Mueller about his findings and comments made in final report; however, Republicans have more questions about Mueller's investigation that Mueller obviously sought to avoid by making it clear he did not want to be subpoenaed to appear before Congress under oath.

“Bob Mueller better be prepared," Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., a leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told Ingraham. "Because I can tell you, he will be cross-examined for the first time and the American people will start to see the flaws in his report."

...AND HIS INVESTIGATION!


‘Mueller better be prepared’: This twist could give GOP firebrands ammo at hearing

.

Must see TV
 
phony shit'

Yep "phony shit" laced with the typical hyperbole of a Rabid RW SJWer.
Thank you for clarifying that you are a 'reality denier, an ultra partisan libtard who refuses to acknowledge facts / evidence, even when it is a Democrat or one who is involved that you have been defending saying it / telling you what you don't want to hear.

:p

I acknowledge that you present nothing but opinionated hyperbole as fact and evidence.
 
I acknowledge that you present nothing but opinionated hyperbole as fact and evidence.

Again, you continue to admit you are a 'reality denier' in the face of so much evidence that has been exposed / reported / recorded.

Lisa Page said FBI discussed charging Hillary Clinton with 'gross negligence' in 2016, and DOJ told them no

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...d-investigators-not-willing-to-charge-Clinton

You can hold meaningful discussions and debates with someone who is genuinely ignorant / unaware of facts because evidence can be presented to them that can change their minds.

Attempting to have a serious, meaningful discussion / debate with someone who is ignorant by choice, who is determined to deny / refuse to acknowledge any and all evidence contrary to the false narrative / belief onto which he clings is pointless.

Such a person, as you have identified yourself to be, should simply be ignored......
 
"Mr. Mueller:

1. Why were you working with Ohr (DOJ) and Steele - who was working with Russians / for Hillary / for Fusion GPS / For the FBI - on the Dossier BEFORE an official investigation of the President and his team officially began and before you were appointed Special Counsel?

-- Why did you NOT recuse yourself when you learned the investigation of President Trump and his team involved / was dependent upon in significant part on the Dossier you worked on with Ohr and Steele? Did you seriously NOT see this as a Conflict of Interest?

2. In an investigation into 'Russian Interference', why didn't you recuse yourself, considering:
- In 2009 you reached out to a Russian Oligarch, the same one mentioned in your investigation / report, to ask him to finance a rescue mission involving a retired FBI agent?

- In 2014 you hid evidence of Russian crimes involving intimidation, extortion and blackmailing Nuclear Commission officials and high-ranking US?

Did you seriously NOT see these as a Conflicts of Interest?

3. Why didn't you recuse yourself based on the fact that you were James Comey's 'Mentor' as former FBI Director and his close personal friend? Did you seriously NOT see this as a Conflict of Interest?

4. Speaking of Conflicts of Interest: Why did your hand-picked team consist of DNC and Hillary heavy contributors and supporters and even a Clinton Foundation Lawyer, and not one single unbiased / Conservative member?

5. EXACTLY WHEN - how far into your investigation - did you learn that neither President Trump nor anyone associated with him 'illegally colluded' with Russians?

- Were you aware that the FBI conducted its own internal investigation / opened up a counter-intelligence operation investigation against the President and his team BEFORE THE OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION BEGAN / BEFORE YOU WERE APPOINTED SPECIAL COUNSEL? If not, WHY not?

- Were you aware that the FBI found ZERO evidence of 'Russian Collusion' BEFORE your official investigation was opened and BEFORE you were appointed Special Counsel? If not, WHY not?

- Besides there being ZERO evidence of any crime having been committed warranting an investigation and a Special Counsel being appointed, do you know that there is no such crime as 'Collusion'? Is so, what the hell / what crime were you investigating?


6. Having been the FBI Director during the time your agency engaged in 75 FISA COURT VIOLATIONS, did you investigate the legality of the FISA Warrants obtained by former FBI Director Comey and former Deputy US AG Rosenstein? If not, WHY NOT?

- Did you know Steel had been identified by numerous Obama administration Agency officials as a Trump-hating, partisan, lying foreign spy who could not be trusted and who admitted he had no idea if what was in the Dossier was valid...BEFORE Comey and Rosenstein (and Clapper and Brennan) presented the information in the Dossier to the FISA Court and to Congress as 'legitimate intel'? If not, why not?

- Did you know the FBI had the Dossier for 9 months and never attempted to substantiate the claims made in the Dossier? If not, why not?
-- When you worked with Ohr and Steele before being appointed Special Counsel, did YOU ever attempt to substantiate any of the claims in the Dossier? If not, why not?

- WHY DID YOU NOT INVESTIGATE FISA COURT ABUSES, when they were proven to have come up during your investigation? WHY did the US IG and the new US AG have to follow up behind your investigation and do so?



I can just imagine these being only a few of the questions Mueller will face when he appears before Congress....and in between Mueller Pleading the 5th Cummings and other Democrats will do their best to interfere, interject, waste the GOP's official allotted time, and otherwise attempt to protect ther Obama administration's 'Insurance policy'!


:p


 
assuming Trump doesn't invoke executive privilege over him

That's some funny stuff.
Life sucks when you stage a COUP more fitting of a third world Nation than America, and then you fail at it.

Yeah yeah, we already "Coup'ed the House in 2018. And we're going for the "Coup" hat trick in 2020.

Beside, Executive Privileged covers presidential deliberations and conversations with the president. Mueller have any of those?

I highly doubt that. Your COUP De Village Party severely underperformed the historical trend of a sitting president losing a few seats in The House of Reps in his first midterm, and Trump gained seats in The Senate which runs counter to the historical trend there.

Let me lay some PROGNOSTICATION on you.

Your Stupid COUP, and You and Your Village of Idiots spending 3 years lying to The American People about a FAKE COUP while trying to cover your own Criminal Russian Collusion Tracks is going to cost you a SUPER MAJORITY in 2020.

Trump will be unstoppable.

Maybe he will use Drones to Fire Bomb Sanctuary Cities starting in 2021.

I'll bring the marshmallows.


wp2805238.jpg
 
phony shit'

Yep "phony shit" laced with the typical hyperbole of a Rabid RW SJWer.
Thank you for clarifying that you are a 'reality denier, an ultra partisan libtard who refuses to acknowledge facts / evidence, even when it is a Democrat or one who is involved that you have been defending saying it / telling you what you don't want to hear.

:p

I acknowledge that you present nothing but opinionated hyperbole as fact and evidence.
Said Blind Boo when he looks in The Mirror every day before he marches off to post his dribble.
 
During his 10-Minute 'This is what I meant' public announcement (which his office issued a 'correction' to 30 minutes later), Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller begged Democrats NOT to subpoena him and force him to testify and answer questions under oath. If that happened, he vowed, he would refuse to answer questions and would only recite excerpts from his final Report.

Mueller's begging and threats not to answer questions did not work. Mueller is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees on July 17.


The FBI used a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, but both evidence and testimony (Steele, Ohr, Page - FBI) prove the Obama administration's Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agency Directors (Rosenstein, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey) illegally engaged in FISA Court abuses in order to illegally get those warrants.

"There is a more than reasonable chance that by that time, the Justice Department inspector general could release his highly anticipated report on the FBI’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) system in the early stages of the Russia probe."

"Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, a former federal prosecutor, will now get the opportunity to ask this question to Mueller as well, and the IG report may provide fodder for more targeted questioning. Related subjects that GOP committee members could bring up are precisely what led to the launching of the probe, and at what point in the two-year investigation did Mueller realize he did not have the evidence to show an illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia."

The Democrats have publicly stated that they are eager to get answers from Mueller about his findings and comments made in final report; however, Republicans have more questions about Mueller's investigation that Mueller obviously sought to avoid by making it clear he did not want to be subpoenaed to appear before Congress under oath.

“Bob Mueller better be prepared," Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., a leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told Ingraham. "Because I can tell you, he will be cross-examined for the first time and the American people will start to see the flaws in his report."

...AND HIS INVESTIGATION!


‘Mueller better be prepared’: This twist could give GOP firebrands ammo at hearing

.
Closed hearings? I would love to watch him do EXACTLY what he said he would do in his letter. The Repubs will blow a gasket.
 
...while 'firebombing sanctuary cities' is a little frightening, no such action needs to be taken against Libtard cities. California is becoming the 'Homeless Capital' of the United states....people are sleeping urinating, and defecating on the sidewalks...they are imploding, self-destructing.

California and self-destructing Libtard cities across the country are like frantic people drowning - they thrash as they go under, and if you even get close to them to try to help them they just 'leech' onto you and drag you under, too.

Throwing money at the problem does not change the foundational F*ed up socialist mindset / agenda that keeps the problem from being resolved. It's / they're almost like a fire that is so big and hot it can't be extinguished, that has to just burn itself out.
 
Closed hearings? I would love to watch him do EXACTLY what he said he would do in his letter. The Repubs will blow a gasket.
Mueller should be forced to testify under oath live on S-CPAN, since he did waste nearly 3 years and millions of tax payer dollars with his BS failed investigating.

Nadless demanded to see the ENTIRE transcript, to include what he knew he was not legally entitled to?

The American people should demand to see the entire hearing - every question asked of Mueller, every time he refuses to give an answer about his 'legitimate' investigation, every time he refuses to answer a question - exposing his criminal lack of transparency and his lack of accountability for how he wasted those 3 years and millions of our tax dollars!

If Mueller thinks refusing to answer legitimate questions about his investigation and instead continues to defy Congress by reading off excerpts from his report that was so 'insufficient' (piss-poor) that even Democrats want him to testify / answer questions makes him, his hand-picked bunch of political assassins, or his investigation anything but like part of the exposed Obama administration's failed, exposed soft coup attempt he is only fooling himself and the emotionally manipulated snowflakes who still cling to their denial that Democrats perpetrated crimes that Mueller ignored / refused to investigate....
 
During his 10-Minute 'This is what I meant' public announcement (which his office issued a 'correction' to 30 minutes later), Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller begged Democrats NOT to subpoena him and force him to testify and answer questions under oath. If that happened, he vowed, he would refuse to answer questions and would only recite excerpts from his final Report.

Mueller's begging and threats not to answer questions did not work. Mueller is scheduled to appear before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees on July 17.


The FBI used a FISA warrant to monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, but both evidence and testimony (Steele, Ohr, Page - FBI) prove the Obama administration's Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agency Directors (Rosenstein, Clapper, Brennan, and Comey) illegally engaged in FISA Court abuses in order to illegally get those warrants.

"There is a more than reasonable chance that by that time, the Justice Department inspector general could release his highly anticipated report on the FBI’s use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) system in the early stages of the Russia probe."

"Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, a former federal prosecutor, will now get the opportunity to ask this question to Mueller as well, and the IG report may provide fodder for more targeted questioning. Related subjects that GOP committee members could bring up are precisely what led to the launching of the probe, and at what point in the two-year investigation did Mueller realize he did not have the evidence to show an illegal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia."

The Democrats have publicly stated that they are eager to get answers from Mueller about his findings and comments made in final report; however, Republicans have more questions about Mueller's investigation that Mueller obviously sought to avoid by making it clear he did not want to be subpoenaed to appear before Congress under oath.

“Bob Mueller better be prepared," Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., a leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told Ingraham. "Because I can tell you, he will be cross-examined for the first time and the American people will start to see the flaws in his report."

...AND HIS INVESTIGATION!


‘Mueller better be prepared’: This twist could give GOP firebrands ammo at hearing

.
Closed hearings? I would love to watch him do EXACTLY what he said he would do in his letter. The Repubs will blow a gasket.

I want to see Moffa, Nellie Ohr, Priestap, Banner, Brennan, Pientka, Baker, Ohr, Loretta Lynch, James Comey, Powers, Rice, McDonough, Gaeta, Obama, Clinton, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Brazile, Schultz, Podesta, Mook, Crowdstrike, Fusion GPS, Yates, McCord, John Kerry, Farkas, Natalia Veselnitskya, Steele, Skirpal, Sid Blumenthal, John McCain's Staff, Orbis, Ben Rhodes, all put under OATH in front of The American People, and then put on Trial and Locked up.
 
Last edited:
Your COUP De Village Party severely underperformed the historical trend of a sitting president losing a few seats in The House of Reps in his first midterm

The 41-seat gain was the Democrats' largest gain of House seats since the post-Watergate 1974

and Trump gained seats in The Senate which runs counter to the historical trend there.

Democrats had to defend 26 seats verse 7 for Trumpublicans.
 
Your COUP De Village Party severely underperformed the historical trend of a sitting president losing a few seats in The House of Reps in his first midterm
The 41-seat gain was the Democrats' largest gain of House seats since the post-Watergate 1974
So? This doesn't change the fact the Dems under-perfomed in 2018.
How many seats did the GOP gain in 1994?
How many seats did the GOP gain in 2010?
 
Actually begging did work by the democrats and that's why Mueller is violating the law by opening up a dead case. Meanwhile the crisis on the border continues and the democrat party continues to use dead kids as political pawns.
 

Forum List

Back
Top