Mueller intended for Congress to decide if trump obstructed justice....NOT BARR!

[Mike473]

Here is the problem for the Trump haters.

Pelosi and the gang will NEVER bring up impeachment. Never mind the fact they could never get 67 Senators to remove him. Pelosi doesn't have the nerve to do it. Clinton and others are likely telling her to keep the issue alive but no impeachment. Do you think Clinton, Yates and the rest of them want to be cross examined in a Senate trial. Give me a break. All of what you see is nothing more than political theatre to hurt Trump. But, in reality, Trump is in the clear.

 

[blackhawk]

Please go foreword with impeachment we would all love to see it blow up in the Democrats face like it did the Republicans when they tried it with Clinton.

 

[Muhammed]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,

And Mueller found no evidence of any of that.

 

[kyzr]

It doesn't matter what Mueller "intended". It's Barr's report, and Barr said, no collusion, no obstruction.

 

[Care4all]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Yes, Mueller left it up to Congress and gave them the road map, for Impeachment Inquiry...

Barr jumped in, where he did NOT belong.

Jaworski and Ken Starr, did the same for Nixon and Clinton... they did not press charges against these Presidents, they turned over a road map for Congress, to impeach them, or in the least, to begin impeachment hearings.

We have a bunch of crooked people in the white house, beginning with Barr.

I have not been following details. How does Barr's decision prevent Congress from opening their own investigations and proceeding with impeachment? I did not think they needed a "crime" in order to impeach. Is that what you are thinking? That since Barr did not find a crime, Congress no longer has a leg to stand on?

What Barr did is put his finger on the scale with the American people, to give a false narrative by saying the President would not be charged.... when he never could charge the president, with their own rules stating such.... he tried to make it look like the president did nothing wrong, when that is NOT what the Mueller report showed.... Mueller said the President is NOT above the law, and the means to handle this is through the Congress or after he leaves office, thru the Justice system.

Barr tried to shut down impeachment proceedings, before they even could start, by lying and giving the impression to all of the American people, that the president did not commit a crime.... Mueller NEVER stated the president did not commit a crime, just that he and the grand jury, could not charge him with a crime.

 

[leftwinger]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,

And Mueller found no evidence of any of that.

The whole bogus report is based on the TT phony setup meeting. But Mule left out the main fact that the Russian private citizen Lawyer was working with Fusion GPS. Everything that follows that date is nonsense.

 

[Care4all]

Read the report...

I'm with Romney, it is sickening.... that any American, would do what they all repeatedly did....

 

[miketx]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

 

[JimH52]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Congress cannot pass a Bill of Attainder.

Thus without an actual felony or misdemeanor conviction through the justice system, they cannot proceed with actual impeachment.

The Bill of Attainder clause in the Constitution was specifically added to prevent a partisan Congress from abusing impeachment powers. Once again, the Founder Fathers cockblocked you.

I remind you that trump will not be indicted while in office....but if he were not so called president....he would be going to jail with his former lawyer...

 

[Ambivalent1]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Go for it twit. You people are idiots

 

[Muhammed]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Congress cannot pass a Bill of Attainder.

Thus without an actual felony or misdemeanor conviction through the justice system, they cannot proceed with actual impeachment.

The Bill of Attainder clause in the Constitution was specifically added to prevent a partisan Congress from abusing impeachment powers. Once again, the Founder Fathers cockblocked you.

I remind you that trump will not be indicted while in office....but if he were not so called president....he would be going to jail with his former lawyer...

For what, exactly?

 

[Ambivalent1]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Congress cannot pass a Bill of Attainder.

Thus without an actual felony or misdemeanor conviction through the justice system, they cannot proceed with actual impeachment.

The Bill of Attainder clause in the Constitution was specifically added to prevent a partisan Congress from abusing impeachment powers. Once again, the Founder Fathers cockblocked you.

Everything is emotion with these people. They are going to hand the election to Trump

 

[JimH52]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Yes, Mueller left it up to Congress and gave them the road map, for Impeachment Inquiry...

Barr jumped in, where he did NOT belong.

Jaworski and Ken Starr, did the same for Nixon and Clinton... they did not press charges against these Presidents, they turned over a road map for Congress, to impeach them, or in the least, to begin impeachment hearings.

We have a bunch of crooked people in the white house, beginning with Barr.

I have not been following details. How does Barr's decision prevent Congress from opening their own investigations and proceeding with impeachment? I did not think they needed a "crime" in order to impeach. Is that what you are thinking? That since Barr did not find a crime, Congress no longer has a leg to stand on?

What Barr did is put his finger on the scale with the American people, to give a false narrative by saying the President would not be charged.... when he never could charge the president, with their own rules stating such.... he tried to make it look like the president did nothing wrong, when that is NOT what the Mueller report showed.... Mueller said the President is NOT above the law, and the means to handle this is through the Congress or after he leaves office, thru the Justice system.

Barr tried to shut down impeachment proceedings, before they even could start, by lying and giving the impression to all of the American people, that the president did not commit a crime.... Mueller NEVER stated the president did not commit a crime, just that he and the grand jury, could not charge him with a crime.

trump encouraged perjury....he intimidated witnesses....he fabricated false evidence...he is a Slug..

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I remind you that trump will not be indicted while in office....but if he were not so called president....he would be going to jail with his former lawyer...

You don't have to be President. Just be a presidential candidate on the Democrat ticket and you'll get out of all kinds of jail time.

 

[Care4all]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Yes, Mueller left it up to Congress and gave them the road map, for Impeachment Inquiry...

Barr jumped in, where he did NOT belong.

Jaworski and Ken Starr, did the same for Nixon and Clinton... they did not press charges against these Presidents, they turned over a road map for Congress, to impeach them, or in the least, to begin impeachment hearings.

We have a bunch of crooked people in the white house, beginning with Barr.

I have not been following details. How does Barr's decision prevent Congress from opening their own investigations and proceeding with impeachment? I did not think they needed a "crime" in order to impeach. Is that what you are thinking? That since Barr did not find a crime, Congress no longer has a leg to stand on?

What Barr did is put his finger on the scale with the American people, to give a false narrative by saying the President would not be charged.... when he never could charge the president, with their own rules stating such.... he tried to make it look like the president did nothing wrong, when that is NOT what the Mueller report showed.... Mueller said the President is NOT above the law, and the means to handle this is through the Congress or after he leaves office, thru the Justice system.

Barr tried to shut down impeachment proceedings, before they even could start, by lying and giving the impression to all of the American people, that the president did not commit a crime.... Mueller NEVER stated the president did not commit a crime, just that he and the grand jury, could not charge him with a crime.

trump encouraged perjury....he intimidated witnesses....he fabricated false evidence...he is a Slug..

Thug!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Yes, Mueller left it up to Congress and gave them the road map, for Impeachment Inquiry...

Barr jumped in, where he did NOT belong.

Jaworski and Ken Starr, did the same for Nixon and Clinton... they did not press charges against these Presidents, they turned over a road map for Congress, to impeach them, or in the least, to begin impeachment hearings.

We have a bunch of crooked people in the white house, beginning with Barr.

I have not been following details. How does Barr's decision prevent Congress from opening their own investigations and proceeding with impeachment? I did not think they needed a "crime" in order to impeach. Is that what you are thinking? That since Barr did not find a crime, Congress no longer has a leg to stand on?

What Barr did is put his finger on the scale with the American people, to give a false narrative by saying the President would not be charged.... when he never could charge the president, with their own rules stating such.... he tried to make it look like the president did nothing wrong, when that is NOT what the Mueller report showed.... Mueller said the President is NOT above the law, and the means to handle this is through the Congress or after he leaves office, thru the Justice system.

Barr tried to shut down impeachment proceedings, before they even could start, by lying and giving the impression to all of the American people, that the president did not commit a crime.... Mueller NEVER stated the president did not commit a crime, just that he and the grand jury, could not charge him with a crime.

Ah, so you read all 440 pages of the report. That must have taken you a lot of time.

What Mueller said is that obstruction could not be ruled out, but it wasn't up to him to say Trump was guilty of it, nor did he have any solid evidence of it because obstruction is subjective.

 

[jknowgood]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Kinda like Holder? Obama's wing man. You didn't care about that one. You have no credibility.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Your an Idiot...

The DOJ makes all prosecution judgments of any item not charged by a special counsle, not congress. Muller had no business creating at 400 page non-charging document. In the real legal world they would have clearly stated there was insufficient evidence to charge.

The shear ignorance of Nadler and Schiff makes me want to puke...

The fact Mueller did not charge anyone for obstruction is evidence that he did not have the evidence to do so and that he could not support the charges.

GAME OVER!

 

[Mike473]

Here is the quote from the Mueller document

Under OLC's analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct
by the President, such as suborning perjury , intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence ,
because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions. See Application of 28 U.S.C.
§ 458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. O.L.C. at 357 n.11. The
Constitution does not authorize the President to engage in such conduct, and those actions would
transgress the President's duty to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. " U.S . CONST.
ART IT, §§ 3.
_________________________________________________________________________________

The lying POS needs to be handled!

Your an Idiot...

The DOJ makes all prosecution judgments of any item not charged by a special counsle, not congress. Muller had no business creating at 400 page non-charging document. In the real legal world they would have clearly stated there was insufficient evidence to charge.

The shear ignorance of Nadler and Schiff makes me want to puke...

The fact Mueller did not charge anyone for obstruction is evidence that he did not have the evidence to do so and that he could not support the charges.

GAME OVER!

It is over. It has to be difficult for this crowd to accept. They still believe Hillary will somehow become president.

They tried to frame Trump for a crime that would ultimately remove him from office. Now, they are trying to prosecute Trump for not allowing them to do it!

 

[Care4all]

Here is the problem for the Trump haters.

Pelosi and the gang will NEVER bring up impeachment. Never mind the fact they could never get 67 Senators to remove him. Pelosi doesn't have the nerve to do it. Clinton and others are likely telling her to keep the issue alive but no impeachment. Do you think Clinton, Yates and the rest of them want to be cross examined in a Senate trial. Give me a break. All of what you see is nothing more than political theatre to hurt Trump. But, in reality, Trump is in the clear.

They may not, but they SHOULD... even if he is not convicted in the Senate, even if the Democrats lose their asses in the next election.... they SHOULD, based on what the Mueller report shows in their facts and evidence, in plain sight.

To allow any president, to get away with this clear and present obstruction and abuse of power, is a slippery slope that NO PRESIDENT should be allowed to do.... even if not convicted because of the yellow belly Republican senators, it will curb our future Presidents and this president, lawless and un-American actions.

It's a major risk, and likely not good for the Democrats, but it is necessary, to save the democracy our founders gave us, with 3 equal branches of government, with a purpose for each.

The President has not faithfully, executed the Laws of this great Nation of ours, and must be called out on it.