BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,769
- 26,951
- 2,615
It's right after the part that says abortion is a right.Sounds like a good idea. Where, in the constitution does it give bankers that authority
'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's right after the part that says abortion is a right.Sounds like a good idea. Where, in the constitution does it give bankers that authority
'
There's that dumb question again. "But there were no victims".Who was cheated?
The person loaning the money.
Got it. Any thug who has a long rap sheet can just say "that cop doesn't like me", and gets off on any crime that cop catches him for. Rob a liquor store? No problem. Cops don't like me so I can't be charged.When there is a crime reported, then courts handle it. It's pretty simple and that doesnt change. Whats wrong is for the Government to be able to trample our riights and be able to go after a citizen THEY do not like.. for whatever reason and go looking for a crime they hope they can prosecute. I have no idea why you cant see whats wrong with that if your an American.
But I get it.. you hate trump so... nod nod wink wink..who cares its only Trump! but this will eventually give the government more power over all of us. it's intimidation for the sake of politics. The law is not supposedto work that way " justice is blind" etc...
There's that dumb question again. "But there were no victims".
In Normal World, the STATE is the victim if a state law is broken. Most of us follow the law, even if you and your cult leader don't.
I'm sure you'd defend an asshole who drove through a school zone at 75mph because he didn't kill any kids.
"Gee, there were no victims".
Based on the court findings, it sure looks like it did.Never happened.
So you explain who should decide.Not one random judge.
The driveway on the property is worth 18 million.
This wasn't cheating. It was part of the negotiation process for procuring loans.
Good point, but not applicable here. This was a negotiation.There's that dumb question again. "But there were no victims".
In Normal World, the STATE is the victim if a state law is broken. Most of us follow the law, even if you and your cult leader don't.
I'm sure you'd defend an asshole who drove through a school zone at 75mph because he didn't kill any kids.
"Gee, there were no victims".
I dunno. Tell us.How do you think that judge arived at that number?
How do you think that judge arived at that number?
Got it. Any thug who has a long rap sheet can just say "that cop doesn't like me", and gets off on any crime that cop catches him for. Rob a liquor store? No problem. Cops don't like me so I can't be charged.
If a bank wanted to sue Trump, do you think they would have had grounds to do so?Not one banker sued Trump. People can put any price they want.
Man.... You're naivety in the subject is incredible.If you find all the developers guilty, good. If they broke the law, tough shit.
It's far past time we fixed capitalism before we fucking lose it.
I thought Trumpsters were "populists". Populists don't like rich fat cat cheaters.
Maybe the Trumpsters are frauds, huh?
Their hatred will do them in.Yep, ultimately its up to the bank to approve the loan. Trump didnt put a gun to their head. Why did they not take issue with any of Trump's amounts listed?? They obviously conidered it all a formality as they Know Trump is good for the money....
But this all figures.Democrats go after the wealth creators. I cant even imagine how much spin off revenue Trump has created for the city of New York... as have other developers. Democrats need to go back to school and re study civilization 101.....
There's that dumb question again. "But there were no victims".
In Normal World, the STATE is the victim if a state law is broken. Most of us follow the law, even if you and your cult leader don't.
I'm sure you'd defend an asshole who drove through a school zone at 75mph because he didn't kill any kids.
"Gee, there were no victims".
If a bank wanted to sue Trump, do you think they would have had grounds to do so?
No bank has ever sued Trump. You know why this happened.If a bank wanted to sue Trump, do you think they would have had grounds to do so?
To determine who broke our laws.To determine value?