Moscow Skyscraper Goes Up in Flames But Does Not Collapse

[westwall]

The fire broke out on April 2, just before sunset, in the Federation Tower that planned to be Europe's tallest building, in Moscow, Russia. The Tower is located in Moscow City, a cluster of modern high-rise office buildings. The flames were over 250 meter (880 feet) tall. The tower, when completed, is to be 360 meter (1150 feet) tall.

Federation Tower in Moscow on Fire - YouTube

So the roof burned off. Not quite the same as the middle being burned out along with and accelerant.


But good try.







Actually, I'd call it a piss poor attempt.

 

[eots]

The fire broke out on April 2, just before sunset, in the Federation Tower that planned to be Europe's tallest building, in Moscow, Russia. The Tower is located in Moscow City, a cluster of modern high-rise office buildings. The flames were over 250 meter (880 feet) tall. The tower, when completed, is to be 360 meter (1150 feet) tall.

Federation Tower in Moscow on Fire - YouTube

So the roof burned off. Not quite the same as the middle being burned out along with and excellent.


But good try.

Russian news reports said the fire engulfed 300 square metres (3200 square feet) at its height as the blaze tore through the 65th to the 67th floor.



fires between the 93rd and 99th floors of the WTC North Tower. .....


In August 2000, Moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) Ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65Qg_-89Zr8]Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube[/ame]

 

[syrenn]

The fire broke out on April 2, just before sunset, in the Federation Tower that planned to be Europe's tallest building, in Moscow, Russia. The Tower is located in Moscow City, a cluster of modern high-rise office buildings. The flames were over 250 meter (880 feet) tall. The tower, when completed, is to be 360 meter (1150 feet) tall.

Federation Tower in Moscow on Fire - YouTube

So the roof burned off. Not quite the same as the middle being burned out along with and accelerant.


But good try.

Russian news reports said the fire engulfed 300 square metres (3200 square feet) at its height as the blaze tore through the 65th to the 67th floor.



fires between the 93rd and 99th floors of the WTC North Tower. .....


In August 2000, Moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) Ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65Qg_-89Zr8]Bad Ass Skyscraper Fires and Destruction!! Awesome!! - YouTube[/ame]

And the plain and fuel is where?

 

[eots]

so the roof burned off. Not quite the same as the middle being burned out along with and accelerant.


But good try.

russian news reports said the fire engulfed 300 square metres (3200 square feet) at its height as the blaze tore through the 65th to the 67th floor.



fires between the 93rd and 99th floors of the wtc north tower. .....


In august 2000, moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65qg_-89zr8]bad ass skyscraper fires and destruction!! Awesome!! - youtube[/ame]

and the plain and fuel is where?

the fuel wtc towers was burned off in the initial fire ball and no plane or jet fuel at wtc 7

 

[syrenn]

russian news reports said the fire engulfed 300 square metres (3200 square feet) at its height as the blaze tore through the 65th to the 67th floor.



fires between the 93rd and 99th floors of the wtc north tower. .....


In august 2000, moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


bad ass skyscraper fires and destruction!! Awesome!! - youtube

and the plain and fuel is where?

the fuel wtc towers was burned off in the initial fire ball and no plane or jet fuel at wtc 7

just keep telling your self that if it comforts you.

 

[uscitizen]

The lights were still on in that building?

 

[laughinReaper]

In August 2000, Moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) Ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[/url]

"Catching fire" isn't the same as two planes fully loaded with jet fuel crashing into a building at a high rate of speed and then EXPLODING like a bomb. The impact of the planes alone probably compromised the structure then you had an explosion that no doubt did further damage and then a very hot burn. That's three catestrophic events happening in the space of a few minutes as opposed to a building catching fire and just burning. You're comparing apples to oranges.

 

[eots]

In August 2000, Moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) Ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[/url]

"Catching fire" isn't the same as two planes fully loaded with jet fuel crashing into a building at a high rate of speed and then EXPLODING like a bomb. The impact of the planes alone probably compromised the structure then you had an explosion that no doubt did further damage and then a very hot burn. That's three catestrophic events happening in the space of a few minutes as opposed to a building catching fire and just burning. You're comparing apples to oranges.

no planes hit wtc 7

 

[laughinReaper]

In August 2000, Moscow's 540-metre (1,771-foot) Ostankino broadcasting tower, once the world's tallest freestanding structure, caught fire and burned for 26 hours.


[/url]

"Catching fire" isn't the same as two planes fully loaded with jet fuel crashing into a building at a high rate of speed and then EXPLODING like a bomb. The impact of the planes alone probably compromised the structure then you had an explosion that no doubt did further damage and then a very hot burn. That's three catestrophic events happening in the space of a few minutes as opposed to a building catching fire and just burning. You're comparing apples to oranges.

no planes hit wtc 7

It was probably hit with flying debris when the towers collasped. Maybe the foundation was compromised by a few tons of building shaking the ground so close to the building. Most buildings on the east coast are not built for the ground to shake under them. Those buildings coming down must have been like an earthquake to the surrounding buildings. You also don't know if WTC 7 had any unknown structural flaws that when put under stress, would cause the building to collaspe. Then again I'm sure those who designed WTC 7 never even considered two massive buildings collasping in close proximity to their building,who would think of that? You're chasing ghosts.