Moscow 🐷 🇷🇺 empire wants Alaska "back", 150 years after it was sold to the US. Are you ready to die for Alaska (Pourquoi mourir pour Dan(t)zig?)?

are you ready to die for Alaska (French: Pourquoi mourir pour Dan(t)zig?)?

  • YES , I DO !

    Votes: 5 71.4%
  • No way!

    Votes: 2 28.6%

  • Total voters
    7

Litwin

Platinum Member
Sep 3, 2017
32,693
4,886
1,015
GDL&Sweden
Moscow empire is going to start putting Alaska as a part of itself in it's maps a soon, with support of our radical left & Trumpits ....

My qestion to the Americans , are you ready to die for Alaska (French: Pourquoi mourir pour Dan(t)zig?)?

this political slogan has nothing to do with " Danzig was not part of France"

Why Die for Danzig? - Wikipedia


The phrase originated in the title of an article ("Mourir pour Dantzig?") by the French Neo-Socialist writer Marcel Déat, published on May 4, 1939 in the Parisian newspaper L'Œuvre (L'Œuvre in French Wikipedia)[2][3] The article concerned one of the Nazi German ultimatums to the Second Polish Republic, regarding the demand to transfer control of the Free City of Danzig (Gdańsk) to Germany.[4] In the article, Déat argued in favor of appeasement.[5] He asserted that France had no interest in defending Poland, and that German Chancellor Adolf Hitler would be satisfied after receiving the territory he (rightfully, according to Déat[6]) demanded. He accused the Poles of warmongering and dragging Europe into a war.[6] Déat argued that Frenchmen should not be called to die paying for irresponsible Polish politicking,[6]..... But to die for Danzig, no!" ("Mais mourir pour Dantzig, non !") [7]...Following French defeat by Germany and the creation of the Vichy regime, Déat became an advocate of fascism and a Nazi collaborator, going so far as to look for support in Nazi Germany for his fascist party, which was more radical than the Vichy regime.
1705923273697.png


 
Last edited:
Okay, Litwin, buddy, here's the thing.

Putin can barely hold onto the Donbass, he's not going to take Alaska.

The only question now is, when do the Russians and Ukrainians admit their war is at a stalemate and negotiate the equitable peace they should have negotiated ten years ago?
 
Okay, Litwin, buddy, here's the thing.

Putin can barely hold onto the Donbass, he's not going to take Alaska.
SO WHAT ? ME and You know it, Mongol - Muscovites believe that we all weak gays- transsexual here, and can´t fight " real 🇷🇺 🇸🇦 men"

Chinese academic Deng Xize : "No more Mongol-Muscovy style empire: Thoughts on the war in Ukraine, The global reaction to the war in Ukraine in fact shows that such empires will no longer be tolerated."


The Mongol-Muscovy style empire could be defined as a dominating, rapacious empire upheld by violence, especially unruly violence, and exhibiting three prominent characteristics.

First, it uses unruly violence as a regular means of resolving international disputes. While violence is common and sometimes necessary in political or social governance, rules have been set for its use under a modern lawful democratic system. Unlike in ancient times, the use of violence now comes under heavy restrictions and is “predictable”. Such an evolution also applies to international relations.

here the channel which do great job for us. what Muscovites (state - imperial TV) think , plan :

putin´s Pundits say Moscow empire has ambitious war goals​




putin´s State TV experts discuss how to bring down America




putin´s official Zakhar Prilepin says Moscow empire should annex more former Soviet - East European states​



more :

 
Last edited:
If the Russians wanted to take back Alaska there is not much we could do about it with Potatohead's weak depleted incompetent military made up of queers, trannies, dumbass affirmative action Negroes, Illegals and weak women.
 
If the Russians wanted to take back Alaska there is not much we could do about it with Potatohead's weak depleted incompetent military made up of queers, trannies, dumbass affirmative action Negroes, Illegals and weak women.
My qestion was - are you ready to die for Alaska (French: Pourquoi mourir pour Dan(t)zig?)?

 
Russia, more importantly, does not want Alaska.

Please close this thread.

czar Putin signed an order insinuating the sale of Alaska to the United States in 1867 was illegitimate.This mofo is trolling the West and our leaders shake in their boots in response.
We should issue a statement that we don't recognize the Moscow empire´s territory. Any of it.

1705940150344.png







etc.
 
Last edited:
If the Russians wanted to take back Alaska there is not much we could do about it with Potatohead's weak depleted incompetent military made up of queers, trannies, dumbass affirmative action Negroes, Illegals and weak women.
 
Moscow empire is going to start putting Alaska as a part of itself in it's maps a soon, with support of our radical left & Trumpits ....

My qestion to the Americans , are you ready to die for Alaska (French: Pourquoi mourir pour Dan(t)zig?)?

this political slogan has nothing to do with " Danzig was not part of France"

Why Die for Danzig? - Wikipedia


The phrase originated in the title of an article ("Mourir pour Dantzig?") by the French Neo-Socialist writer Marcel Déat, published on May 4, 1939 in the Parisian newspaper L'Œuvre (L'Œuvre in French Wikipedia)[2][3] The article concerned one of the Nazi German ultimatums to the Second Polish Republic, regarding the demand to transfer control of the Free City of Danzig (Gdańsk) to Germany.[4] In the article, Déat argued in favor of appeasement.[5] He asserted that France had no interest in defending Poland, and that German Chancellor Adolf Hitler would be satisfied after receiving the territory he (rightfully, according to Déat[6]) demanded. He accused the Poles of warmongering and dragging Europe into a war.[6] Déat argued that Frenchmen should not be called to die paying for irresponsible Polish politicking,[6]..... But to die for Danzig, no!" ("Mais mourir pour Dantzig, non !") [7]...Following French defeat by Germany and the creation of the Vichy regime, Déat became an advocate of fascism and a Nazi collaborator, going so far as to look for support in Nazi Germany for his fascist party, which was more radical than the Vichy regime.
View attachment 891577


I doubt Russia could afford what Alaska would be worth today. And I rather think Canada likes having a big chunk of the USA between them and Russia. So would we risk blood and treasure to defend Alaska? I think we would risk blood and treasure to defend the 733,000+ U.S. citizens who live there. Well, maybe 'we' wouldn't include Biden who has made it crystal clear he doesn't give a damn about U.S. citizens. So if Russia is going to make their move they better make it in this year sometime.
 

Forum List

Back
Top