Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
exactly and this is 20201. written over 200 years ago--this is not 1850 or 1950 anymoreYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
2. written by men who thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote
3. written by humans who are not perfect
4. can be interpreted many ways
It's a part of the 14th Amendment. 1868.
the 2nd amendment could have been written to apply only to members of a militia....but it wasnt...They could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
please don't try to say it's NOT a stupid law....everyone knows it is..People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
I really don't care what you think about the law. I'm simply glad to see it acknowledged as the law.
This is wonderful news! Thanks for the post.Birther tourism is a practice of pregnant women coming to the US to drop anchor babies. Sometimes they do it to anchor themselves into the country, and other times it's more nefarious, like having a baby so it's an American, and taking it back home to be radicalized by their government or religion. Once an adult, that person can walk into this country, no questions asked, to do God knows what kind of harm to us.
As expected, the Democrats could care less. The more non-Americans in the country, the better, regardless of the potential danger to citizens. Thank God Trump is President; the first President to ever take a hard look and action on this growing problem.
You need to be subscriber to get the entire article, but it shows enough to get the gist of it.
White House Explains New Birth Tourism Crackdown
..yes--let's keep stupid laws--that makes sense---hahahhahahahahaplease don't try to say it's NOT a stupid law....everyone knows it is..People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
I really don't care what you think about the law. I'm simply glad to see it acknowledged as the law.
1. written over 200 years ago--this is not 1850 or 1950 anymoreYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
2. written by men who thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote
3. written by humans who are not perfect
4. can be interpreted many ways
It's a part of the 14th Amendment. 1868.
1. written over 200 years ago--this is not 1850 or 1950 anymoreYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
2. written by men who thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote
3. written by humans who are not perfect
4. can be interpreted many ways
It's a part of the 14th Amendment. 1868.
According to the Constitution's 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 to ensure citizenship for the newly emancipated African Americans, "all persons, born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude from automatic citizenship American-born persons whose allegiance to the United States was incomplete. For example, Native Americans were excluded from American citizenship because of their tribal jurisdiction. Also not subject to American jurisdiction were foreign visitors, ambassadors, consuls, and their babies born here. In the case of illegal aliens, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Therefore, some Constitutional scholars argue that the completeness of the allegiance to the United States is impaired and logically precludes automatic citizenship. However, this issue has never been directly decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Birthright Citizenship | Federation for American Immigration Reform
There was massive Irish Immigration when the 14th amendment was written. It was obviously open ended to include all births.They could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
Birther tourism is a practice of pregnant women coming to the US to drop anchor babies. Sometimes they do it to anchor themselves into the country, and other times it's more nefarious, like having a baby so it's an American, and taking it back home to be radicalized by their government or religion. Once an adult, that person can walk into this country, no questions asked, to do God knows what kind of harm to us.
As expected, the Democrats could care less. The more non-Americans in the country, the better, regardless of the potential danger to citizens. Thank God Trump is President; the first President to ever take a hard look and action on this growing problem.
You need to be subscriber to get the entire article, but it shows enough to get the gist of it.
White House Explains New Birth Tourism Crackdown
Birther tourism is a practice of pregnant women coming to the US to drop anchor babies. Sometimes they do it to anchor themselves into the country, and other times it's more nefarious, like having a baby so it's an American, and taking it back home to be radicalized by their government or religion. Once an adult, that person can walk into this country, no questions asked, to do God knows what kind of harm to us.
As expected, the Democrats could care less. The more non-Americans in the country, the better, regardless of the potential danger to citizens. Thank God Trump is President; the first President to ever take a hard look and action on this growing problem.
You need to be subscriber to get the entire article, but it shows enough to get the gist of it.
White House Explains New Birth Tourism Crackdown
It is a good move, the writers of the 14th never envisioned a time when travel was so safe and ordered that people could plan their births here.
Someone said it would not survive in the courts, I cannot see what is wrong with it. Who gets a visa and who does not is always at the whim of the State Dept.
I say, Good Job Trump.
We had liberals back then, we also had immigrantsThey could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?People born on U.S. soil automatically become American citizens.
It's nice to see them acknowledge this.
Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
Birther tourism is a practice of pregnant women coming to the US to drop anchor babies. Sometimes they do it to anchor themselves into the country, and other times it's more nefarious, like having a baby so it's an American, and taking it back home to be radicalized by their government or religion. Once an adult, that person can walk into this country, no questions asked, to do God knows what kind of harm to us.
As expected, the Democrats could care less. The more non-Americans in the country, the better, regardless of the potential danger to citizens. Thank God Trump is President; the first President to ever take a hard look and action on this growing problem.
You need to be subscriber to get the entire article, but it shows enough to get the gist of it.
White House Explains New Birth Tourism Crackdown
It is a good move, the writers of the 14th never envisioned a time when travel was so safe and ordered that people could plan their births here.
Someone said it would not survive in the courts, I cannot see what is wrong with it. Who gets a visa and who does not is always at the whim of the State Dept.
I say, Good Job Trump.
The thing is Trump says a lot of things but never follows it up.
Actually, it’s a perfect example of a foreigner doing work that a normal American wouldn’t be willing to do.your post is pure bullshitBarron (that's Sir Barron to you) is an anchor baby. Melanoma had him to anchor herself to the orange idiot's wallet.Birther tourism is a practice of pregnant women coming to the US to drop anchor babies. Sometimes they do it to anchor themselves into the country, and other times it's more nefarious, like having a baby so it's an American, and taking it back home to be radicalized by their government or religion. Once an adult, that person can walk into this country, no questions asked, to do God knows what kind of harm to us.
As expected, the Democrats could care less. The more non-Americans in the country, the better, regardless of the potential danger to citizens. Thank God Trump is President; the first President to ever take a hard look and action on this growing problem.
You need to be subscriber to get the entire article, but it shows enough to get the gist of it.
White House Explains New Birth Tourism Crackdown
Also, don't you think it's kind of tacky that he named his son after one of his aliases, John Barron? LOL.
There was massive Irish Immigration when the 14th amendment was written. It was obviously open ended to include all births.They could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
It was not an OOPs
We had liberals back then, we also had immigrantsThey could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
We had liberals back then, we also had immigrantsThey could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
1. written over 200 years ago--this is not 1850 or 1950 anymoreYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?Why? It's not something they can change unfortunately. You know foreigners are way more important to Democrats than Americans.
2. written by men who thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote
3. written by humans who are not perfect
4. can be interpreted many ways
It's a part of the 14th Amendment. 1868.
According to the Constitution's 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 to ensure citizenship for the newly emancipated African Americans, "all persons, born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude from automatic citizenship American-born persons whose allegiance to the United States was incomplete. For example, Native Americans were excluded from American citizenship because of their tribal jurisdiction. Also not subject to American jurisdiction were foreign visitors, ambassadors, consuls, and their babies born here. In the case of illegal aliens, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Therefore, some Constitutional scholars argue that the completeness of the allegiance to the United States is impaired and logically precludes automatic citizenship. However, this issue has never been directly decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Birthright Citizenship | Federation for American Immigration Reform
Nowhere does it include "foreign visitors". They are completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If an Ambassador commits a crime, they are not.
We had liberals back then, we also had immigrantsThey could have written it to apply to slaves only....they didn’tYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?
The fourteenth amendment was not written for anchor babies. It had to do with citizenship of freed slaves and their children.
They didn't expect us to ever grow dumb enough to have liberals. Otherwise the Constitution would be 50 pages long, to include color pictures, so that liberals in the future would be able to figure it out.
Liberals back then were more conservative than the conservatives we have now. This amendment really needs to be interpreted by the Supreme Court now that we have more constitutional judges on the bench.
1. written over 200 years ago--this is not 1850 or 1950 anymoreYeah, that constitution is a pesky little document that just hurts "real amuricans", and should be subject to change by the whim of a presidential executive order, right?
2. written by men who thought slavery was ok and women shouldn't vote
3. written by humans who are not perfect
4. can be interpreted many ways
It's a part of the 14th Amendment. 1868.
According to the Constitution's 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 to ensure citizenship for the newly emancipated African Americans, "all persons, born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was intended to exclude from automatic citizenship American-born persons whose allegiance to the United States was incomplete. For example, Native Americans were excluded from American citizenship because of their tribal jurisdiction. Also not subject to American jurisdiction were foreign visitors, ambassadors, consuls, and their babies born here. In the case of illegal aliens, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Therefore, some Constitutional scholars argue that the completeness of the allegiance to the United States is impaired and logically precludes automatic citizenship. However, this issue has never been directly decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Birthright Citizenship | Federation for American Immigration Reform
Nowhere does it include "foreign visitors". They are completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. If an Ambassador commits a crime, they are not.
Has nothing to do if they commit a crime or not. John McCain was not born in the states. His father was serving overseas when he was born. However McCain is an American citizen because he was born to American parents. His allegiance is to the US.
Elian Gonzalez was sent back to Cuba because he was a Cuban citizen. We had no right to keep him here, and one of the few things Clinton did right was send him back in spite of the resistance of Americans. He was a Cuban citizen, he went back to the country he had allegiance with.
