More Russian Collusion, but this time it is a Demonrat...Oh Tusli what have you done?

[Third Party]

Trump did not collude with Russia Either as proven by a 3 year investigation by Mueller. But you keep pretending otherwise.

the trump campaign colluded left and right, and up and down with the Russians during the campaign..... the 2 year criminal investigation could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, a criminal conspiracy... that does not mean the team did not collude and work with the Russians, promoting and encouraging the Russian's meddling and seeking out the Russian gvt's help..

What the Trump team and Trump did, was simply WRONG, and unAmerican to do.

And YOU KNOW IT....

You would be the first to complain if it were an Obama campaign and Obama doing something close to what the Trump team did against his Republican opponent during the campaign would have caused you to call him a traitor to this Nation.

LOL no evidence but they did it.... You people are insane and amazingly STUPID. Mueller STATED for the record there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump or his staff colluded with the Russians.

here's the thing,

HE NEVER STATED what you said... he, nor those giving the summaries of their area of special counsel responsibilities in the report did not state that there was ''NO'' evidence... there WAS evidence, they just could ''not establish'' an illegal Conspiracy, beyond a reasonable doubt... in some cases it was merely because they could not establish the colluder's 'intent' or the colluder was unaware that they were breaking the law... the conspiracy occured but there are more aspects to convicting someone for it than merely the action itself.

ITS OVER!

Take a deep breath!

Telling the TRUTH and getting to the TRUTH, really bothers you! Why?

It ain't over till the fat Lady sings, and evidently, she hasn't sung yet!

OK, you are right. Durham is still investigating the Democrats, but I expect a nothing burger like the Mueller novel.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Nobody EVER colluded-its over!

did the things I mentioned, ever happen? Of course they did.

and Gabbard has not done any of those things or anything even comparable, so she is not colluding with the Russians, as op implied or jokingly implied.

Trump did not collude with Russia Either as proven by a 3 year investigation by Mueller. But you keep pretending otherwise.

the trump campaign colluded left and right, and up and down with the Russians during the campaign..... the 2 year criminal investigation could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, a criminal conspiracy... that does not mean the team did not collude and work with the Russians, promoting and encouraging the Russian's meddling and seeking out the Russian gvt's help..

What the Trump team and Trump did, was simply WRONG, and unAmerican to do.

And YOU KNOW IT....

You would be the first to complain if it were an Obama campaign and Obama doing something close to what the Trump team did against his Republican opponent during the campaign would have caused you to call him a traitor to this Nation.

LOL no evidence but they did it.... You people are insane and amazingly STUPID. Mueller STATED for the record there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump or his staff colluded with the Russians.

here's the thing,

HE NEVER STATED what you said... he, nor those giving the summaries of their area of special counsel responsibilities in the report did not state that there was ''NO'' evidence... there WAS evidence, they just could ''not establish'' an illegal Conspiracy, beyond a reasonable doubt... in some cases it was merely because they could not establish the colluder's 'intent' or the colluder was unaware that they were breaking the law... the conspiracy occured but there are more aspects to convicting someone for it than merely the action itself.

LOL beyond a reasonable means that since they could NOT he is innocent you fucking loon. He said for the record NO COLLUSION Occurred, you pretending otherwise by playing word games is hilarious, stupid and ignorant but hilarious.

 

[Care4all]

did the things I mentioned, ever happen? Of course they did.

and Gabbard has not done any of those things or anything even comparable, so she is not colluding with the Russians, as op implied or jokingly implied.

Trump did not collude with Russia Either as proven by a 3 year investigation by Mueller. But you keep pretending otherwise.

the trump campaign colluded left and right, and up and down with the Russians during the campaign..... the 2 year criminal investigation could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, a criminal conspiracy... that does not mean the team did not collude and work with the Russians, promoting and encouraging the Russian's meddling and seeking out the Russian gvt's help..

What the Trump team and Trump did, was simply WRONG, and unAmerican to do.

And YOU KNOW IT....

You would be the first to complain if it were an Obama campaign and Obama doing something close to what the Trump team did against his Republican opponent during the campaign would have caused you to call him a traitor to this Nation.

LOL no evidence but they did it.... You people are insane and amazingly STUPID. Mueller STATED for the record there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump or his staff colluded with the Russians.

here's the thing,

HE NEVER STATED what you said... he, nor those giving the summaries of their area of special counsel responsibilities in the report did not state that there was ''NO'' evidence... there WAS evidence, they just could ''not establish'' an illegal Conspiracy, beyond a reasonable doubt... in some cases it was merely because they could not establish the colluder's 'intent' or the colluder was unaware that they were breaking the law... the conspiracy occured but there are more aspects to convicting someone for it than merely the action itself.

LOL beyond a reasonable means that since they could NOT he is innocent you fucking loon. He said for the record NO COLLUSION Occurred, you pretending otherwise by playing word games is hilarious, stupid and ignorant but hilarious.

He said he would not address collusion, and would only address criminal conspiracy, in his report

 

[Third Party]

Trump did not collude with Russia Either as proven by a 3 year investigation by Mueller. But you keep pretending otherwise.

the trump campaign colluded left and right, and up and down with the Russians during the campaign..... the 2 year criminal investigation could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, a criminal conspiracy... that does not mean the team did not collude and work with the Russians, promoting and encouraging the Russian's meddling and seeking out the Russian gvt's help..

What the Trump team and Trump did, was simply WRONG, and unAmerican to do.

And YOU KNOW IT....

You would be the first to complain if it were an Obama campaign and Obama doing something close to what the Trump team did against his Republican opponent during the campaign would have caused you to call him a traitor to this Nation.

LOL no evidence but they did it.... You people are insane and amazingly STUPID. Mueller STATED for the record there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump or his staff colluded with the Russians.

here's the thing,

HE NEVER STATED what you said... he, nor those giving the summaries of their area of special counsel responsibilities in the report did not state that there was ''NO'' evidence... there WAS evidence, they just could ''not establish'' an illegal Conspiracy, beyond a reasonable doubt... in some cases it was merely because they could not establish the colluder's 'intent' or the colluder was unaware that they were breaking the law... the conspiracy occured but there are more aspects to convicting someone for it than merely the action itself.

LOL beyond a reasonable means that since they could NOT he is innocent you fucking loon. He said for the record NO COLLUSION Occurred, you pretending otherwise by playing word games is hilarious, stupid and ignorant but hilarious.

He said he would not address collusion, and would only address criminal conspiracy, in his report

Neither were present most people feel, so lets move on.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Trump did not collude with Russia Either as proven by a 3 year investigation by Mueller. But you keep pretending otherwise.

the trump campaign colluded left and right, and up and down with the Russians during the campaign..... the 2 year criminal investigation could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt, a criminal conspiracy... that does not mean the team did not collude and work with the Russians, promoting and encouraging the Russian's meddling and seeking out the Russian gvt's help..

What the Trump team and Trump did, was simply WRONG, and unAmerican to do.

And YOU KNOW IT....

You would be the first to complain if it were an Obama campaign and Obama doing something close to what the Trump team did against his Republican opponent during the campaign would have caused you to call him a traitor to this Nation.

LOL no evidence but they did it.... You people are insane and amazingly STUPID. Mueller STATED for the record there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump or his staff colluded with the Russians.

here's the thing,

HE NEVER STATED what you said... he, nor those giving the summaries of their area of special counsel responsibilities in the report did not state that there was ''NO'' evidence... there WAS evidence, they just could ''not establish'' an illegal Conspiracy, beyond a reasonable doubt... in some cases it was merely because they could not establish the colluder's 'intent' or the colluder was unaware that they were breaking the law... the conspiracy occured but there are more aspects to convicting someone for it than merely the action itself.

LOL beyond a reasonable means that since they could NOT he is innocent you fucking loon. He said for the record NO COLLUSION Occurred, you pretending otherwise by playing word games is hilarious, stupid and ignorant but hilarious.

He said he would not address collusion, and would only address criminal conspiracy, in his report

He specifically said collusion did not occur you lying piece of garbage. Further he did NOT say he did not charge the President with a crime because he was the President, aid he left the determination up to Barr.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Further he did NOT say he did not charge the President with a crime because he was the President, aid he left the determination up to Barr.

Doesn't that in a way imply that if he were not President that he would have been charged with a crime?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Further he did NOT say he did not charge the President with a crime because he was the President, aid he left the determination up to Barr.

Doesn't that in a way imply that if he were not President that he would have been charged with a crime?

No that means that it wasn't his decision it was the Attorney Generals decision. Mueller made it CLEAR in the Congressional Hearing he did NOT say he did not charge him because he was the President.

 

[playtime]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

 

[Katniss]

Gabbard is not a democrat, she is an opportunist and in this instance a spoiler.

I have grave concerns over her positions on Syria. I think it has exposed her vulnerability.

 

[Edgetho]

He said he would not address collusion, and would only address criminal conspiracy, in his report

Condensed version of the Mewler Report for Millenials

 

[2aguy]

Russia's propaganda machine discovers 2020 Dem contender Tulsi Gabbard

The Russian propaganda machine that tried to influence the 2016 U.S. election is now promoting the presidential aspirations of a controversial Hawaii Democrat who earlier this month declared her intention to run for president in 2020.
An NBC News analysis of the main English-language news sites employed by Russia in its 2016 election meddling shows Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who is set to make her formal announcement Saturday, has become a favorite of the sites Moscow used when it interfered in 2016.

You just cant make this shit up, it is better than any soap opera ever made. I cant wait till the next debate and see who is next to be part of the Russian Collusion..

In the world of the left wing nut job......they will all end up walking to the guillotine in the end...it is just a matter of time until one left winger turns on another left winger calling out their purity, or calling them a traitor to their creation of Utopia....Mario Lopez is finding this out....now Tulsi Gabbard.

 

[pknopp]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

 

[Hellokitty]

same thing they did in 2016 primaries, they promoted Bernie and Jill Stein, not Hillary.

Did she seek out Russian help? Has she made excuses for the Russians doing it, like telling everyone it could be some 400lb man in his basement doing the interference and not Russians, did she go on tv and encourage the Russians to find her opponents 30,000 missing emails, did her campaign manager give detailed inside polling data for her campaign to the Russians so they could influence crutial voters better, did she have her campaign reach wikileaks to get a heads up on what stolen emails of her opponent were going to be released and also direct the timing of leaks, did her campaign meet with the Russians to discuss their help?

EASY PEASY

If she didn't do those kind of things, then there is no collusion with the Russians on her or her campaign's part!

How will we know what she has or hasn't done unless we have an investigation? You don't think Tusli working with Russia would be smart enough to not make the mistakes by TRUMP?

 

[Katniss]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

Agree but that has nothing to do with whether she is being used as a tool wittingly or otherwise.

 

[pknopp]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

Agree but that has nothing to do with whether she is being used as a tool wittingly or otherwise.

If the tool is the correct one for the job I should what exactly?

 

[Katniss]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

Agree but that has nothing to do with whether she is being used as a tool wittingly or otherwise.

If the tool is the correct one for the job I should what exactly?

No matter the cost ...... would you continue an action if you thought it would aid a hostile foreign country?

 

[playtime]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

she's a mixed bag. as AG she followed laws that were on the books. was she not suppose to? she was also an advocate for reform.

Through interviews with law professors, former prosecutors, political analysts and the candidate’s campaign, we found a mixed record.

On the one hand, Harris achieved some notable reform-minded victories, including efforts to reduce recidivism and eliminate bias in law enforcement. She also burnished her progressive credentials in 2004 with a controversial decision as district attorney not to seek the death penalty for a man suspected of killing a police officer.

At other times, Harris’ positions disappointed criminal-justice advocates, and that’s becoming an issue in the Democratic presidential primary.

Harris’ criminal justice reform achievements

There’s little question that Harris has notched some achievements that are in tune with what criminal-justice reform advocates have sought. They include:

• The Back On Track program in 2005, which was designed to help nonviolent, first-time drug offenders transition back to their communities and prevent recidivism.

• Her refusal in 2013 to defend California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, saying in a press release, "The Supreme Court has described marriage as a fundamental right 14 times since 1888. The time has come for this right to be afforded to every citizen."

• Her 2015 launch of Open Justice, a criminal-justice open-data initiative that provides information on deaths in police custody, including those that occur during arrests, as well as arrest rates by race and ethnicity. It also provides data on officers who are killed or assaulted on the job.

• Her creation of the first statewide implicit bias training for law enforcement personnel in 2015. It called for a focus on six areas of policing that "emphasize respect, listening, neutrality and trust, while recognizing and addressing implicit biases that can be barriers to these approaches," according to a news release at the time from the attorney general’s office.

• Her implementation of a body camera pilot program for all agents in her attorney general’s department in 2015.

• Her establishment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board in 2016.

"As a prosecutor in the early and mid 2000s, a time when so many still held a ‘lock ‘em up’ mentality, Senator Harris pioneered a reentry program that became a state and national model," Ian Sams, Harris’ campaign spokesman, said in a written statement, referring to the Back On Track program. "As Attorney General, she implemented a first-of-its-kind training on implicit bias and procedural justice and made her officers wear body cameras. And in the Senate, she has championed criminal justice reform measures to end mass incarceration, upend cash bail, and confront discrimination. That is her record, and it’s one of consistently making progress and protecting people in pursuit of a fairer system."

Harris’ record on the death penalty
[...]


Kamala Harris: Reformer or silent ally of the status quo?

tulsi won't condemn assad & stated that she believes there was no 'collusion' between donny & vlad & we should all just move fwd & forget about it - cause an impeachment would 'divide this country'.... lol... hello? where ya been for the last 2 1/2 years tuls?

of course the roooskies want her to stick around.

 

[pknopp]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

Agree but that has nothing to do with whether she is being used as a tool wittingly or otherwise.

If the tool is the correct one for the job I should what exactly?

No matter the cost ...... would you continue an action if you thought it would aid a hostile foreign country?

You are the reason Trump will win again. This entire "Russia" thing is turning me and many others off big time.

 

[playtime]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

Agree but that has nothing to do with whether she is being used as a tool wittingly or otherwise.

If the tool is the correct one for the job I should what exactly?

be very suspicious as to why putin would like them.

 

[pknopp]

tulsi is a useful idiot is all. she is being used to throw a monkey wrench into the race & siphon votes.......... i doubt she will even make it to the next debate, let alone a primary.

tusi = jill stein 2.0

Her response to Harris was spot on. As AG, Harris was extremely to the right. We are expected to believe she changed overnight?

she's a mixed bag. as AG she followed laws that were on the books. was she not suppose to? she was also an advocate for reform.

Through interviews with law professors, former prosecutors, political analysts and the candidate’s campaign, we found a mixed record.

On the one hand, Harris achieved some notable reform-minded victories, including efforts to reduce recidivism and eliminate bias in law enforcement. She also burnished her progressive credentials in 2004 with a controversial decision as district attorney not to seek the death penalty for a man suspected of killing a police officer.

At other times, Harris’ positions disappointed criminal-justice advocates, and that’s becoming an issue in the Democratic presidential primary.

Harris’ criminal justice reform achievements

There’s little question that Harris has notched some achievements that are in tune with what criminal-justice reform advocates have sought. They include:

• The Back On Track program in 2005, which was designed to help nonviolent, first-time drug offenders transition back to their communities and prevent recidivism.

• Her refusal in 2013 to defend California’s voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, saying in a press release, "The Supreme Court has described marriage as a fundamental right 14 times since 1888. The time has come for this right to be afforded to every citizen."

• Her 2015 launch of Open Justice, a criminal-justice open-data initiative that provides information on deaths in police custody, including those that occur during arrests, as well as arrest rates by race and ethnicity. It also provides data on officers who are killed or assaulted on the job.

• Her creation of the first statewide implicit bias training for law enforcement personnel in 2015. It called for a focus on six areas of policing that "emphasize respect, listening, neutrality and trust, while recognizing and addressing implicit biases that can be barriers to these approaches," according to a news release at the time from the attorney general’s office.

• Her implementation of a body camera pilot program for all agents in her attorney general’s department in 2015.

• Her establishment of the Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board in 2016.

"As a prosecutor in the early and mid 2000s, a time when so many still held a ‘lock ‘em up’ mentality, Senator Harris pioneered a reentry program that became a state and national model," Ian Sams, Harris’ campaign spokesman, said in a written statement, referring to the Back On Track program. "As Attorney General, she implemented a first-of-its-kind training on implicit bias and procedural justice and made her officers wear body cameras. And in the Senate, she has championed criminal justice reform measures to end mass incarceration, upend cash bail, and confront discrimination. That is her record, and it’s one of consistently making progress and protecting people in pursuit of a fairer system."

Harris’ record on the death penalty
[...]


Kamala Harris: Reformer or silent ally of the status quo?

tulsi won't condemn assad & stated that she believes there was no 'collusion' between donny & vlad & we should all just move fwd & forget about it - cause an impeachment would 'divide this country'.... lol... hello? where ya been for the last 2 1/2 years tuls?

of course the roooskies want her to stick around.

People believed Bill Clinton committed perjury which was an impeachable offense also but what happened when the GOP impeached him?

Impeaching Trump will only make him harder to defeat. It will rally his base big time and even if you impeach him, he goes nowhere.

Learn the lessons of the past.