Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."
I wonder if the supporters of those conservative politicians will all of a sudden change their tune and support gun safety. Or will they turn on those politicians calling them traitors or rinos?
The latter. I refused to vote for Rick Scott because as his last act as governor he infringed on the 2nd Amendment.
I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."
I wonder if the supporters of those conservative politicians will all of a sudden change their tune and support gun safety. Or will they turn on those politicians calling them traitors or rinos?
The latter. I refused to vote for Rick Scott because as his last act as governor he infringed on the 2nd Amendment.
I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Except that evidence shows that we have reached and surpassed the maximum effectiveness and gone over to the infringement of the 2nd area. This quote and this argument has been used so much and will continue to be used until our right is gone. It's already gone for those under 21.
There are "responsibilities and limitations" on all rights. It seems most gun enthusiastic think the right to bear arms should carry with it no limitation or responsibilities.Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."
I wonder if the supporters of those conservative politicians will all of a sudden change their tune and support gun safety. Or will they turn on those politicians calling them traitors or rinos?
The latter. I refused to vote for Rick Scott because as his last act as governor he infringed on the 2nd Amendment.
I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Fuck the Liberal definition "responsibilities and limitations". A stupid hateful Liberal's definition of those and mine are very different.
For instance, in New York State the filthy Liberals confiscated the firearms of a guy for seeing a doctor about insomnia. The requirement to report him and the warrant to size his weapons were all under the SAFE Act, which was touted by the lyingLiberals as "reasonable gun control".
The Democrat assholes in DC said that under the definition of being "reasonable" that nobody in DC could have a handgun.
I don't trust Liberals to define my Constitutional rights because they always get it wrong. Their agenda is not public safety but to take the ability of non Marxist to oppose the far Left government that they want to impose on the US.
There are "responsibilities and limitations" on all rights. It seems most gun enthusiastic think the right to bear arms should carry with it no limitation or responsibilities.Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."I wonder if the supporters of those conservative politicians will all of a sudden change their tune and support gun safety. Or will they turn on those politicians calling them traitors or rinos?
The latter. I refused to vote for Rick Scott because as his last act as governor he infringed on the 2nd Amendment.
I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Fuck the Liberal definition "responsibilities and limitations". A stupid hateful Liberal's definition of those and mine are very different.
For instance, in New York State the filthy Liberals confiscated the firearms of a guy for seeing a doctor about insomnia. The requirement to report him and the warrant to size his weapons were all under the SAFE Act, which was touted by the lyingLiberals as "reasonable gun control".
The Democrat assholes in DC said that under the definition of being "reasonable" that nobody in DC could have a handgun.
I don't trust Liberals to define my Constitutional rights because they always get it wrong. Their agenda is not public safety but to take the ability of non Marxist to oppose the far Left government that they want to impose on the US.
That's fine with me. Make the age of majority 21. That fucks over the commies' ability to sucker young people into making a serious mistake and voting Democrat.Using the left's logic those under the age of 21 are not mature enough to have an abortion or enter the military or law enforcement or vote. Seriously it states that right in the gun control bill, that people under the age of 21 are not mature enough as justification for infringing their 2nd amendment rights.
Every time a gun safety law is on the ballot here in Washington the people overwhelmingly vote to approve it.
This time it's a far reaching law. Including regulation on semi automatic weapons.
When the issue is taken out of the hands of politicians the people of my state overwhelmingly pass proper gun safety laws.
So when it's taken away from a politician who is bribed by the nra, we get proper gun safety laws.
Washington state voters pass ballot measure to further regulate guns, including semi-automatic rifles
Every time a gun safety law is on the ballot here in Washington the people overwhelmingly vote to approve it.
This time it's a far reaching law. Including regulation on semi automatic weapons.
When the issue is taken out of the hands of politicians the people of my state overwhelmingly pass proper gun safety laws.
So when it's taken away from a politician who is bribed by the nra, we get proper gun safety laws.
Washington state voters pass ballot measure to further regulate guns, including semi-automatic rifles
Great for Washington state. I believe all states should have the right to pass the laws they see fit. We don’t need Washington DC politicians doing what states can do for themselves.
Every time a gun safety law is on the ballot here in Washington the people overwhelmingly vote to approve it.
This time it's a far reaching law. Including regulation on semi automatic weapons.
When the issue is taken out of the hands of politicians the people of my state overwhelmingly pass proper gun safety laws.
So when it's taken away from a politician who is bribed by the nra, we get proper gun safety laws.
Washington state voters pass ballot measure to further regulate guns, including semi-automatic rifles
Great for Washington state. I believe all states should have the right to pass the laws they see fit. We don’t need Washington DC politicians doing what states can do for themselves.
Washington state had nothing to do with it. Anti gun NY liberals flooded the state with millions of dollars in FALSE and MISLEADING advertising to trick people into voting for this. Just like they did a few years ago on another gun control bill. Bloomberg is the asshole leading this, New York interfering in Washington State's business.
Every time a gun safety law is on the ballot here in Washington the people overwhelmingly vote to approve it.
This time it's a far reaching law. Including regulation on semi automatic weapons.
When the issue is taken out of the hands of politicians the people of my state overwhelmingly pass proper gun safety laws.
So when it's taken away from a politician who is bribed by the nra, we get proper gun safety laws.
Washington state voters pass ballot measure to further regulate guns, including semi-automatic rifles
Great for Washington state. I believe all states should have the right to pass the laws they see fit. We don’t need Washington DC politicians doing what states can do for themselves.
Washington state had nothing to do with it. Anti gun NY liberals flooded the state with millions of dollars in FALSE and MISLEADING advertising to trick people into voting for this. Just like they did a few years ago on another gun control bill. Bloomberg is the asshole leading this, New York interfering in Washington State's business.
So you’re opinion is the voters of Washington State are easily fooled. I still don’t care.
The second amendment reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."There are "responsibilities and limitations" on all rights. It seems most gun enthusiastic think the right to bear arms should carry with it no limitation or responsibilities.Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."The latter. I refused to vote for Rick Scott because as his last act as governor he infringed on the 2nd Amendment.
I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Fuck the Liberal definition "responsibilities and limitations". A stupid hateful Liberal's definition of those and mine are very different.
For instance, in New York State the filthy Liberals confiscated the firearms of a guy for seeing a doctor about insomnia. The requirement to report him and the warrant to size his weapons were all under the SAFE Act, which was touted by the lyingLiberals as "reasonable gun control".
The Democrat assholes in DC said that under the definition of being "reasonable" that nobody in DC could have a handgun.
I don't trust Liberals to define my Constitutional rights because they always get it wrong. Their agenda is not public safety but to take the ability of non Marxist to oppose the far Left government that they want to impose on the US.
It sure as hell doesn't have the draconian limitations that the filthy Liberals think it should, does it? Shall not be infringed doesn't mean anything to a stupid hateful Liberal, does it?
The second amendment reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."There are "responsibilities and limitations" on all rights. It seems most gun enthusiastic think the right to bear arms should carry with it no limitation or responsibilities.Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Fuck the Liberal definition "responsibilities and limitations". A stupid hateful Liberal's definition of those and mine are very different.
For instance, in New York State the filthy Liberals confiscated the firearms of a guy for seeing a doctor about insomnia. The requirement to report him and the warrant to size his weapons were all under the SAFE Act, which was touted by the lyingLiberals as "reasonable gun control".
The Democrat assholes in DC said that under the definition of being "reasonable" that nobody in DC could have a handgun.
I don't trust Liberals to define my Constitutional rights because they always get it wrong. Their agenda is not public safety but to take the ability of non Marxist to oppose the far Left government that they want to impose on the US.
It sure as hell doesn't have the draconian limitations that the filthy Liberals think it should, does it? Shall not be infringed doesn't mean anything to a stupid hateful Liberal, does it?
Are you a member of a regulated militia? The purpose of the amendment is to guarantee that firearms, that is muskets will be available to militia members and potential members. Over 99% of gun owners are not and have no attention of joining a militia.
The founders certainly did not intend that firearms a thousand times more deadly than muskets would be available to teenagers, those mental incompetent, and dangerous felons.
When Thomas Jefferson said that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, he certainly did not mean that all men may use any means in pursuing happiness.
The first amendment guarantees the right of free speech but that does not mean that a person is free to slander others at will or endanger other by crying fire in a crowed auditorium.
There are always limitation on rights. There has to be in a civilized society.
The second amendment reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."There are "responsibilities and limitations" on all rights. It seems most gun enthusiastic think the right to bear arms should carry with it no limitation or responsibilities.Thewii S R mmm eidd ther the rrun Aa. MiemmezUuEE
"There is a recognition that Second Amendment rights, like First Amendment and other rights, come with responsibilities and limitations. There is no reason both sides of the gun debate can't support policies that both protect the right to legally own guns for sport and safety, and reduce the likelihood of mass fatalities."I hated what Scott did. I even wrote him and told him he was an asshole for signing that stupid bill.
However, there was such a big disparity between him and that idiot Nelson that I held my nose and voted for him.
Randi Weingarten
Fuck the Liberal definition "responsibilities and limitations". A stupid hateful Liberal's definition of those and mine are very different.
For instance, in New York State the filthy Liberals confiscated the firearms of a guy for seeing a doctor about insomnia. The requirement to report him and the warrant to size his weapons were all under the SAFE Act, which was touted by the lyingLiberals as "reasonable gun control".
The Democrat assholes in DC said that under the definition of being "reasonable" that nobody in DC could have a handgun.
I don't trust Liberals to define my Constitutional rights because they always get it wrong. Their agenda is not public safety but to take the ability of non Marxist to oppose the far Left government that they want to impose on the US.
It sure as hell doesn't have the draconian limitations that the filthy Liberals think it should, does it? Shall not be infringed doesn't mean anything to a stupid hateful Liberal, does it?
Are you a member of a regulated militia? The purpose of the amendment is to guarantee that firearms, that is muskets will be available to militia members and potential members. Over 99% of gun owners are not and have no attention of joining a militia.
The founders certainly did not intend that firearms a thousand times more deadly than muskets would be available to teenagers, those mental incompetent, and dangerous felons.
When Thomas Jefferson said that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, he certainly did not mean that all men may use any means in pursuing happiness.
The first amendment guarantees the right of free speech but that does not mean that a person is free to slander others at will or endanger other by crying fire in a crowed auditorium.
There are always limitation on rights. There has to be in a civilized society.
