Annie
Diamond Member
- Nov 22, 2003
- 50,848
- 4,827
- 1,790
Yeah, then there's a nonpartisan legal analyst on CNN who says it's a "judicial hissy fit"
Gee...who you gonna believe. Turtle man with an axe to grind or an independent analysis?
Were you trying to post this as some sort of PROOF of something OTHER than Mitch McConnell's OPINION?
Do you think being intellectually dishonest makes you any points or does the cause of conservatism any good?
When you morons screech about every little thing that Obama does like it's the frickin end of the world, it makes Republicans look desperate. Success is self evident and we've got very little to show.
Why don't you try being honest for once? Many states REQUIRE that if you use the roads, you have to be insured. How is that ANY DIFFERENT than requiring people who use medical services to be insured ?
Oh, I suppose one could opt out of owning a car. Can one opt out of medical care? Is it in our interest to let people opt out of medical care? Court cases forcing parents to seek medical treatment for their sick children OVER the parents' religious beliefs tend to reinforce the precedent that the government CAN compel care for someone if it's in their best interests.
So not only are mandates already established with precedents, but so is government telling you, you have to receive care if your life is in danger.
Making a mountain out of a molehill only means that by the time the election rolls around, no one will believe you when you really do mean it when you cry wolf.
and yet, Holder responded. For all save the last sentence of his response, spot on regarding judicial review. Last sentence? Read it, Marks Holder as a liar.