- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,644
- 57,113
- 2,290
Already decided:
'Because spending money is essential to disseminating speech, as established in Buckley v. Valeo, limiting a corporation's ability to spend money is unconstitutional because it limits the ability of its members to associate effectively and to speak on political issues.'
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It needs to be overturned. MONEY IS NOT SPEECH. A corporation can "speak" about anything it wants to, but there should be NO money changing hands.
How does one make a movie without spending money?
How does a newspaper endorse a candidate without spending money to print it?
.
.
Last edited: