I know, where the hell did that come from?
What a loon.
And PS..what the hell do the two things have to do with each other?
The MO House wants to make it illegal to fire a gun owner for being a gun owner, but it is still perfectly legal to fire someone who is gay just for being gay. They want to grant protected minority status, on par with race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, disability or age to gun owners, but still want to be able to fire the queers.
That's okay with you?
Seems fine to me.
Personally I think anyone ought to be able to be fired for any reason or no reason. One of those personal liberty things I guess.
But if we're going to protect groups, how about protecting a group that excels in law abiding versus a group whose members are riddled with STDs, drug addiction, mental illness and crime?